georgephillip
Diamond Member
First a brief bio of the conservative who's making the charge of a criminal conspiracy to rig the gold and silver markets:
"Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939) is an American economist and a columnist for Creators Syndicate. He served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and was noted as a co-founder of Reaganomics.[1] He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service. He has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy."
This is where Robert's allegation begins:
"My explanation that the sudden appearance of an unprecedented 400 ton short sale of gold on the COMEX in April was a manipulation designed to protect the dollar from the Federal Reserves quantitative easing policy has found acceptance among gold investors and hedge fund managers.
"The sale was a naked short.
"The seller had no gold to sell.
"COMEX reported having gold only equal to about half of the short sale in its vaults, and not all of that was available for delivery. No one but the Federal Reserve could have placed such an order, and the order came from one of the Feds bullion banks, one of the entities 'too big to fail.'
As one unschooled in the dismal science, my first question would be: is Roberts correct to call this particular sale a "naked short?" My second concerns his allegation that "only the Fed could have placed such an order?"
Gangster State America. ?Naked Short? in the Gold Market | Global Research
"Again we see that institutions of the US government are acting 100% against the interests of US citizens. Just who does the US government represent?"
That's my big question.
"Paul Craig Roberts (born April 3, 1939) is an American economist and a columnist for Creators Syndicate. He served as an Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration and was noted as a co-founder of Reaganomics.[1] He is a former editor and columnist for the Wall Street Journal, Business Week, and Scripps Howard News Service. He has testified before congressional committees on 30 occasions on issues of economic policy."
This is where Robert's allegation begins:
"My explanation that the sudden appearance of an unprecedented 400 ton short sale of gold on the COMEX in April was a manipulation designed to protect the dollar from the Federal Reserves quantitative easing policy has found acceptance among gold investors and hedge fund managers.
"The sale was a naked short.
"The seller had no gold to sell.
"COMEX reported having gold only equal to about half of the short sale in its vaults, and not all of that was available for delivery. No one but the Federal Reserve could have placed such an order, and the order came from one of the Feds bullion banks, one of the entities 'too big to fail.'
As one unschooled in the dismal science, my first question would be: is Roberts correct to call this particular sale a "naked short?" My second concerns his allegation that "only the Fed could have placed such an order?"
Gangster State America. ?Naked Short? in the Gold Market | Global Research
"Again we see that institutions of the US government are acting 100% against the interests of US citizens. Just who does the US government represent?"
That's my big question.