Garland is probing Trump again.

[LordBrownTrout]

Translation: Please don't investigate biden or hunter or his laptop. Whaa whaa.

 

[dudmuck]

Translation: Please don't investigate biden or hunter or his laptop. Whaa whaa.

 

[Flash]

Once Trump announced he was running for President it was a given that Potatohead's filthy weaponized Justice Department was going to do something.

They are the scum of this country.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Garland will be a subject of the forthcoming congressional investigations into his civil rights abuses against protesters and parents of school children.

He won't testify. Executive privilege.

 

[konradv]

AG Garland puts special prosecutor in charge of Trump-related investigations

Attorney General Merrick Garland announced on Friday that he is putting a special counsel in charge of multiple ongoing Justice Department investigations involving former President Donald Trump.

www.yahoo.com

Sounds pretty gay to me.

Personally, I think the problem here is that Garland is secretly madly in love with Trump

But enough of my conspiracy theories.

Should they impeach Trump again?

Again? I don’t think he ever stopped.

 

[konradv]

He won't testify. Executive privilege.

He’s not the executive. He can expect the same treatment as Bannon, if he doesn’t cooperate.

 

[Catsnmeters]

He’s not the executive. He can expect the same treatment as Bannon, if he doesn’t cooperate.

The AG isn't part of the executive?

Didn't Barr claim EP?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Can you imagine Dementia Joe under oath?



I don't know how, but they need to get Fetterman under oath somehow as well.

What law has Fetterman broken recently, other than being a fashion disaster?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Of course the left doesn't want to expose the illegal activities of the bidens.

 

[WEATHER53]

Is Garland another hammer prober?

 

[konradv]

The AG isn't part of the executive?

Didn't Barr claim EP?

When? Was he AG at the time?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

America dodged a bullet when Garland was denied SCOTUS

 

[konradv]

America dodged a bullet when Garland was denied SCOTUS

We also dodged a bullet when Pence grew a pair.

 

[Catsnmeters]

When? Was he AG at the time?

Yes, but regardless, the AG is part of the executive.

He will never testify and neither will fauci.

U.S. House panel accuses Barr of contempt as Trump invokes executive privilege

A Democratic-led House panel on Wednesday approved a measure to hold U.S. Attorney General William Barr in contempt for refusing to hand over an unredacted copy of the Mueller report on Russian election interference even as President Donald Trump invoked the legal principle...

www.reuters.com

 

[Catsnmeters]

America dodged a bullet when Garland was denied SCOTUS

Why?

 

[WEATHER53]

Why?

You ask Why more than our 6 year old.
If you dispute or have additional information to his point then provide it. Don’t ask him to “prove himself”; that’s not his obligation nor is this a question asking board. You got a discussion then discuss, you want to play or ask questions- ask mommy.

 

[Catsnmeters]

You ask Why more than our 6 year old.

How many times have I asked why?

Doesn't seem like very often. Of course in a political forum asking why isn't that unusual but anyhow...

If you dispute or have additional information to his point then provide it.

How can I have additional information if I don't know "why" Garland would not be a good SCJ?

Don’t ask him to “prove himself”; that’s not his obligation nor is this a question asking board.

I didn't ask him to prove anything. I simply asked why he/she was glad Garland wasn't appointed SCJ.

You got a discussion then discuss, you want to play or ask questions- ask mommy.

Not sure why asking someone "why" has you so triggered.

Perhaps we should let sassyirishlass answer the question or did you want to run more interference?