TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
- Jun 11, 2015
- 27,485
- 7,921
- Thread starter
- #301
I’ve never heard of people pretending that those who require medical intervention to have children are doing it naturally.Sorry. I don't have time to go hunting for it. Unlike others here I have a life and this is not it. I will assume that it claims that the statement refers only to the ability to conceive and birth children. My reply is that to emphasis that is just plain stupid because no one singles out hetero couples who can't conceive and birth children in the "normal " or usual way" It is just used as another way to disparage and marginalize gay people. The courts, all through the debate on gay marriage, rejected the idea that the ability to procreate has any bearing on gay rights. Quite frankly, I'm tired of the stupidity and pathetic attempts to malign gays.Yes we have. Go read the replies again.Well, we haven't heard back from s/he on that , have we. I don't have a comprehension problem but someone has a communication problem.Having children usually refers to procreation, and if you think harmonica meant otherwise and that gays can’t be parents - you clearly have comprehension problems as s/he has made it abundantly clear what s/he was referring to and what s/he was not referring to."Having Children" can mean birthing them ( which gay people do) or parenting them ( which gay people also do) I think the ass hat means both.
Is there a difference between gay and straight couples who require medical intervention and should they be regarded or treated differently and why?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk