Gay Marriage supporters said this would never happen...

[JakeStarkey]

A poster argued that, yes, the age of consent laws change.

Then the poster created a straw argument that a supposedly major influential group for pedophilia among homosexuals can change the consent law.

One, an opinion is not not proof, so that argument goes over the side. Show us that such a group with solid political power supporting pedophilia exists within any community in the USA.

Two, marriage equality has nothing to do with pedophilia.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Omg a couple of years ago Bode was posting all sorts of queer *pride* parade images, with nancies in *uniform*...The meme was "troops are marching in gay pride parades" as if it was condoned by the military, and officially endorsed by them.

Actually, as I found out later, the Navy DOES allow the marching (in uniform) at fag parades. The Navy - go figure....

 

[JakeStarkey]

The mutability of the age of consent laws is not the issue.

The issue is that somehow marriage equality will influence the age of consent laws to change.

No proof.

 

[Antares]

A poster argued that, yes, the age of consent laws change.

Then the poster created a straw argument that a supposedly major influential group for pedophilia among homosexuals can change the consent law.

One, an opinion is not not proof, so that argument goes over the side. Show us that such a group with solid political power supporting pedophilia exists within any community in the USA.

Two, marriage equality has nothing to do with pedophilia.

Do you support PaintMyHouse's contention that sex with a 14 year old is ok?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Your being obtuse.

We've slipped from what to what? Why is that so hard for you to articulate given that you keep insisting that a slippery slope event occurred.

What. to. What.

From gays wanting special rights, ie SSM, to group marriages, polygamy, and even ignoring age limits.

If you don't need legal consent, for under 18's, to go hunting, swimming, etc why do you need legal consent to have sex?

False equivalency. Move along.

 

[JakeStarkey]

A poster argued that, yes, the age of consent laws change.

Then the poster created a straw argument that a supposedly major influential group for pedophilia among homosexuals can change the consent law.

One, an opinion is not not proof, so that argument goes over the side. Show us that such a group with solid political power supporting pedophilia exists within any community in the USA.

Two, marriage equality has nothing to do with pedophilia.

Do you support PaintMyHouse's contention that sex with a 14 year old is ok?

Either post PMH's "contention" and report it so the mods can deal with the violation, or report yourself to the mods for the rules violation.

I believe, personally, that age of consent laws now are too law for teenagers.

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

A poster argued that, yes, the age of consent laws change.

Then the poster created a straw argument that a supposedly major influential group for pedophilia among homosexuals can change the consent law.

One, an opinion is not not proof, so that argument goes over the side. Show us that such a group with solid political power supporting pedophilia exists within any community in the USA.

Two, marriage equality has nothing to do with pedophilia.

You don't understand what a strawman argument is. Geez, learn your logical fallacies, maybe you could parrot like all liberals do, "its a slippery slope fallacy, BAAH BAAH". Well the op proves that slippery slope in regards to homosexuality and now other sexual deviancy is not inaccurate at all. I didn't misrepresent anyone. I merely showed that removing age of consent laws(a cover for pedophiles) was initially part and partial of the gay rights movement, and that homosexuals have a greater proclivity to pedophilia proportionally than pedophiles. To ignore this, is foolish given that now, the move to designate pedophilia as a sexual preference, not a mental illness, is very similar to the path homosexuality went to being normalized. First step is normalization, next step, revising or abolishing age of consent laws. My prediction, with mass access to media, television and social, and mass proliferation of degenerate hollywood entertainment, we will see this movement to eliminate or lower age of consent laws move even quicker than homosexuality did into the mainstream. It took homosexuality 40 years from the point it was no longer designated a mental illness to achieve mainstream legitimacy. I think the age of consent movement will take 10-20 years.

 

[Antares]

A poster argued that, yes, the age of consent laws change.

Then the poster created a straw argument that a supposedly major influential group for pedophilia among homosexuals can change the consent law.

One, an opinion is not not proof, so that argument goes over the side. Show us that such a group with solid political power supporting pedophilia exists within any community in the USA.

Two, marriage equality has nothing to do with pedophilia.

Do you support PaintMyHouse's contention that sex with a 14 year old is ok?

Either post PMH's "contention" and report it so the mods can deal with the violation, or report yourself to the mods for the rules violation.

I believe, personally, that age of consent laws now are too law for teenagers.

Oh I reported it, repeatedly.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Your being obtuse.

We've slipped from what to what? Why is that so hard for you to articulate given that you keep insisting that a slippery slope event occurred.

What. to. What.

From gays wanting special rights, ie SSM, to group marriages, polygamy, and even ignoring age limits.

If you don't need legal consent, for under 18's, to go hunting, swimming, etc why do you need legal consent to have sex?

In France they believe that immature 14 year old females shouldn't be taught sex by immature 14 year old males but by older more mature men who will teach them the joys of sex. Then those 14 year old girls will turn around and teach their lessons to the 14 year old males.

Slippery slope, lowering the so call age of consent. They can hunt, why can't they have sex?

Same sex marriage is not a special right so your post is fucked from the get-go.

 

[Derideo_Te]

Your being obtuse.

We've slipped from what to what? Why is that so hard for you to articulate given that you keep insisting that a slippery slope event occurred.

What. to. What.

From gays wanting special rights, ie SSM, to group marriages, polygamy, and even ignoring age limits.

SSM is NOT "special rights". It is merely equality under the law.

If you don't need legal consent, for under 18's, to go hunting, swimming, etc why do you need legal consent to have sex?

In France they believe that immature 14 year old females shouldn't be taught sex by immature 14 year old males but by older more mature men who will teach them the joys of sex. Then those 14 year old girls will turn around and teach their lessons to the 14 year old males.

Slippery slope, lowering the so call age of consent. They can hunt, why can't they have sex?

 

[JakeStarkey]

A poster argued that, yes, the age of consent laws change.

Then the poster created a straw argument that a supposedly major influential group for pedophilia among homosexuals can change the consent law.

One, an opinion is not not proof, so that argument goes over the side. Show us that such a group with solid political power supporting pedophilia exists within any community in the USA.

Two, marriage equality has nothing to do with pedophilia.

Now we have a poster insisting that setting up a false proposition and arguing against it is not a straw man.

The poster needs to demonstrate (1) a powerful movement for pedophilia consent is extant in American, and (2) that it is a powerful movement in the LGBT.

The poster can't do either.

Bub, give the proof.

 

[bodecea]

Omg a couple of years ago Bode was posting all sorts of queer *pride* parade images, with nancies in *uniform*...The meme was "troops are marching in gay pride parades" as if it was condoned by the military, and officially endorsed by them.

Yep...it's wonderful!

But "nancies"? Those "nancies" defend our country. Do you?

 

[JakeStarkey]

We've slipped from what to what? Why is that so hard for you to articulate given that you keep insisting that a slippery slope event occurred.

What. to. What.

From gays wanting special rights, ie SSM, to group marriages, polygamy, and even ignoring age limits.

SSM is NOT "special rights". It is merely equality under the law.

If you don't need legal consent, for under 18's, to go hunting, swimming, etc why do you need legal consent to have sex?

In France they believe that immature 14 year old females shouldn't be taught sex by immature 14 year old males but by older more mature men who will teach them the joys of sex. Then those 14 year old girls will turn around and teach their lessons to the 14 year old males.

Slippery slope, lowering the so call age of consent. They can hunt, why can't they have sex?

Yes a link please for such a powerful coercive movement, not only in France but in the USA, please.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Do you know that there are heterosexual pedophiles right now who are not in prison?

Do you know that they are raping children right now without being punished?

Do you know that heterosexual pedophiles are raping children while consenting grown adults of the same sex can't do something that isn't illegal?

Do you know that gay marriage is NOT illegal? Do you know that? Do you?

You want to stop consenting adults from doing something that is NOT illegal because you fear what some other people are doing?

Do you know that you can go fuck yourself?

Do you?

When they are caught, hetero pedophiles don't get a hero's welcome like gay ones do. There is a vast difference between the two CULTURES as to how children are regarded.

See the difference?

Do you?

Gay pedophiles get a hero's welcome? From whom? I haven't seen anyone rallying around the same sex pedophile problem in the Catholic church, have you?

 

[koshergrl]

Omg a couple of years ago Bode was posting all sorts of queer *pride* parade images, with nancies in *uniform*...The meme was "troops are marching in gay pride parades" as if it was condoned by the military, and officially endorsed by them.

Yep...it's wonderful!

But "nancies"? Those "nancies" defend our country. Do you?

I doubt they defend anything except their assholes, and probably not even those.

 

[JakeStarkey]

But "nancies"? Those "nancies" defend our country. Do you?

We thank them for their service, everyone.

And all who are anti-same sex here, please tell us who served.

And all of those of you who are anti-same sex and have not served, shame on you.

 

[koshergrl]

The point being, they're fags dressing up as military.

Not true military.

Sort of like bode isn't true military.

 

[koshergrl]

Is a rainbow cape a part of the Navy uniform?

"...the Navy cleared its sailors to wear uniforms provided they participate in a personal capacity and adhere to military standards of appearance."

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/Jul/19/military-can-wear-uniforms-parade/

 

[JakeStarkey]

The point being, they're fags dressing up as military.

Not true military.

Sort of like bode isn't true military.

Kg, you have no idea what a "true military" or a "true marriage" or a "true sense of Christian compassion" might be.

 

[RWHeathenGamer]

What is the false proposition? Are you saying that the study by the National Health Institute is incorrect in its finding of a higher propensity of pedophilia among homosexuals. Are you saying I misquoted the first gay rights platform(or that it doesn't exist)?

Are you saying the story in the OP is false. What is the false proposition? There is a strong streak of pedophilia in the homosexual community, historically, the movement opposed age of consent laws until they became politically viable and wanted to be accepted socially. And now, pedophilia is on the road towards becoming a sexual preference much like what happened to homosexuality in the 70s.

You are the only ignorant one here. You don't know anything of history of the homosexual rights movement and don't understand what a logical fallacy is.

Until you understand these things, it is a waste of time to continue talking to you.