Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stop Using my YAWN response,it merely shows how UNORIGINAL U R,Billo beats you hands down with Truth and Accuracy...You quote Shit and to put your name and that Great Man Neil Young in the same sentence is an Abomination...but he was right though,you should be on Train to MarrakkeshWatch it dude, only I can quote Neil Young.Syria was attacking Israel from Golan Heights. Jordan declared themselves as going with Egypt when Israel was attacked. Nice try!! Every post I have addressed has been in answer to yours. My My hey, hey The Pro Palestinian Hypocrisy is Here to stay
YAWN.,,, probably one of your biggiest accomplishments
Let's not quibble about a people told to submit to rule by a foreign invader/colonist. What what you have done, Rocco?
U were about to say ???? Yes the Zionists Murdered the Innocent Medic...YES WE ALREADY KNOW...shit you Zionist shits would argue and lie that Black was White or visa-versa if it suited your Bull SHITWe all know what U RIdiot speaks as Idiot isEgypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny
You ought to know. You’re nothing but a joke
Let's not quibble about a people told to submit to rule by a foreign invader/colonist. What what you have done, Rocco?
"What what you have done, Rocco?"
i haven't seen any "thank you's" 
from you to him! you know....when you're all mixed up...
clarifies everything for you............
RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,
Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.
Article 51 - UN Charter said:Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:
Isa Nakhleh Representative of the Arab Higher Committee A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948 said:The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
(COMMENT)Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area
However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.
The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.
The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:
• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.
There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.
Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.
Most Respectfully,
R
The local population being attacked by colonial settlers is not a civil war. The Palestinians were merely defending themselves.The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population.
The Palestinians are squatters. They didn't buy that land, they squatted there while their betters transferred ownership from one to another.RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,
Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.
Article 51 - UN Charter said:Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:
Isa Nakhleh Representative of the Arab Higher Committee A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948 said:The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
(COMMENT)Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area
However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.
The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.
The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:
• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.
There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.
Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.
Most Respectfully,
RThe local population being attacked by colonial settlers is not a civil war. The Palestinians were merely defending themselves.The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population.
RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,
Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.
Article 51 - UN Charter said:Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:
Isa Nakhleh Representative of the Arab Higher Committee A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948 said:The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
(COMMENT)Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area
However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.
The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.
The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:
• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.
There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.
Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.
Most Respectfully,
RThe local population being attacked by colonial settlers is not a civil war. The Palestinians were merely defending themselves.The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population.
Bogan,I don't think so some how,yet another Zionist Bullshit One Liner to deflect the Animal Behaviour of Zionist Breeding...MJ you use to be really good and enlightening,what has happened to thee...I for one expect better from you...stop being a Bozo like some on here,please...steveIdiot speaks as Idiot isGazans aren't smuggling weapons in when they fish; they are trying to feed their families. Even if they were, why can't the IDF board the Gazan vessel and confiscate the weapons? You know why? Because there ain't any fuckin' weapons to confiscate, because they're FUCKING FISHING!Israel didn’t initiate a War, try to smuggle weapons in, etc. etc. Let’s have some fun; The way you still blame Israel for their actions I can feel the same way about those in Gaza! Turn about is fair play
BTW, yes Israel did initiate the war.
Egypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny
We understand. Don't be so hard on yourself Steve. Always a bogan, eh Steve?
God you really are hopelessRE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,
Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.
Article 51 - UN Charter said:Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:
Isa Nakhleh Representative of the Arab Higher Committee A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948 said:The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
(COMMENT)Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area
However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.
The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.
The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:
• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.
There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.
Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.
Most Respectfully,
RThe local population being attacked by colonial settlers is not a civil war. The Palestinians were merely defending themselves.The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population.
The local Arab population waged a war against their Jewish neighbors, and expelled them from their Holy cities. This happened before Palestinian Jews started building new neighborhoods and villages. Building outside of the Jerusalem walls is not an attack by colonial settlers, it was a solution to the economic strife of a poor community that needed a new way to get free from dire conditions that the Arabs inflicted on them.
In Slang here it is call Ringed and Peeled...…………………….in actual fact it is a Crime against Children the same as Female CIRCUMCISION....R U Curcumcised Ilove???or just like it hardIdiot speaks as Idiot isGazans aren't smuggling weapons in when they fish; they are trying to feed their families. Even if they were, why can't the IDF board the Gazan vessel and confiscate the weapons? You know why? Because there ain't any fuckin' weapons to confiscate, because they're FUCKING FISHING!Israel didn’t initiate a War, try to smuggle weapons in, etc. etc. Let’s have some fun; The way you still blame Israel for their actions I can feel the same way about those in Gaza! Turn about is fair play
BTW, yes Israel did initiate the war.
Egypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny
We understand. Don't be so hard on yourself Steve. Always a bogan, eh Steve?
He wishes he was hard. That’s why he is always making reference to his Uncircumcision
YAWNThe Palestinians are squatters. They didn't buy that land, they squatted there while their betters transferred ownership from one to another.RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,
Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.
Article 51 - UN Charter said:Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:
Isa Nakhleh Representative of the Arab Higher Committee A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948 said:The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
(COMMENT)Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area
However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.
The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.
The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:
• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.
There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.
Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.
Most Respectfully,
RThe local population being attacked by colonial settlers is not a civil war. The Palestinians were merely defending themselves.The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population.
In fact Israel proclaimed Independence before it was ratified by the UN Security Council,making Israel Unlawful and IllegalRE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,
Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.
Article 51 - UN Charter said:Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:
Isa Nakhleh Representative of the Arab Higher Committee A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948 said:The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
(COMMENT)Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area
However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.
The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.
The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:
• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.
There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.
Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.
Most Respectfully,
R
U makes me YAWN....actually I reckon you are a BLOKEU were about to say ???? Yes the Zionists Murdered the Innocent Medic...YES WE ALREADY KNOW...shit you Zionist shits would argue and lie that Black was White or visa-versa if it suited your Bull SHITWe all know what U RIdiot speaks as Idiot is
You ought to know. You’re nothing but a joke
Of course I gave the Asshole facts about what happened prior to 67 and there was no response. You have to feel sorry for a piece of FILTH like that
Respect/fully nonesence..ei NON SENCE
I just did it to emphasise
(COMMENT)God you really are hopeless
Well except for the whole UN accepted them thing you might have a point.In fact Israel proclaimed Independence before it was ratified by the UN Security Council,making Israel Unlawful and IllegalRE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,
Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.
Article 51 - UN Charter said:Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.
The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:
Isa Nakhleh Representative of the Arab Higher Committee A/AC.21/10 16 February 1948 said:The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.
(COMMENT)Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area
However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.
The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.
The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:
• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.
• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.
There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.
Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.
Most Respectfully,
R
If you spent more time doing due diligence than your Zionist inspired prattle you speak... you would be a lot better off...as I told you years ago,"LISTEN TO YOUR BETTERS"....I see you are still using the insincere Respect/fully nonesence..ei NON SENCE
