RoccoR
Gold Member
RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Yes, this A/C.1/330 14 October 1948, is the document reference for the 28 September 1948 communique from
Ahmed Hilmi Pasha, Premier of the "All Palestine Government" (APG), with the Secretary-General of the United Nations (UN). This communique declared Palestine, in its entirety and within its boundaries as established before the termination of the British Mandate an independent state" under the name of the "All Palestine Government."
This communique essentially was not actioned by the UN.
This comes up periodically. And it is raised by those pro-Palestinians that most complain that they were denied their "right to self-determination and sovereignty."
KEY FACTORS:
• The termination of the Mandate does not bestow any opening for the heretofore unknown government. The successor government had been arranged prior to the bid by APG.
• Without a territory, APG cannot be a State. Merely announcing that APG is the sovereign over a territory, does not mean that in reality, APG exercises territorial sovereignty within that boundary. The Manhattan Psychiatric Center has any number of Kings, Queens, Princesses, and occasionally an Emporer or two in imperial residence. That does not mean that the reality of the esteemed guests → or that of AGP → is shared by the remainder of the known world.
• A "right" of the APG is no more powerful than the "right" of Israel to the territory. And Israel exercised both their right and sovereignty over a portion of that territory, with the approval → and in coordination with the successor government to the British.
• The "rights" of the Arab Palestinian do not impose an obligation but a sometimes restraint. The Rights of the Arab Palestinian are considered "negative rights;" which includes those contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR).
• Finally, the APG is attempting to mimic the actions of Israel an then to use it to claim possession of the entity not in their possession.
The APG issue is a fallacy that is irrelevant to that under discussion. It is introduced into the discussion to divert the attention from the original issue. It is a classic example of the Arab Palestinians demanding the impossible and seriously damaging their position.
Most Respectfully,
R
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
Yes, this A/C.1/330 14 October 1948, is the document reference for the 28 September 1948 communique from
Ahmed Hilmi Pasha, Premier of the "All Palestine Government" (APG), with the Secretary-General of the United Nations (UN). This communique declared Palestine, in its entirety and within its boundaries as established before the termination of the British Mandate an independent state" under the name of the "All Palestine Government."
This communique essentially was not actioned by the UN.
(COMMENT)Indeed.There is no requirement for the UN Security Council to ratify any declaration of independence.
A/C.1/330 of 14 October 1948
This comes up periodically. And it is raised by those pro-Palestinians that most complain that they were denied their "right to self-determination and sovereignty."
KEY FACTORS:
• The termination of the Mandate does not bestow any opening for the heretofore unknown government. The successor government had been arranged prior to the bid by APG.
• Without a territory, APG cannot be a State. Merely announcing that APG is the sovereign over a territory, does not mean that in reality, APG exercises territorial sovereignty within that boundary. The Manhattan Psychiatric Center has any number of Kings, Queens, Princesses, and occasionally an Emporer or two in imperial residence. That does not mean that the reality of the esteemed guests → or that of AGP → is shared by the remainder of the known world.
• A "right" of the APG is no more powerful than the "right" of Israel to the territory. And Israel exercised both their right and sovereignty over a portion of that territory, with the approval → and in coordination with the successor government to the British.
• The "rights" of the Arab Palestinian do not impose an obligation but a sometimes restraint. The Rights of the Arab Palestinian are considered "negative rights;" which includes those contained in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR).
• Finally, the APG is attempting to mimic the actions of Israel an then to use it to claim possession of the entity not in their possession.
The APG issue is a fallacy that is irrelevant to that under discussion. It is introduced into the discussion to divert the attention from the original issue. It is a classic example of the Arab Palestinians demanding the impossible and seriously damaging their position.
Most Respectfully,
R