Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper

[USAF 2023]

RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ theliq, et al,

Much like Boris Badenov and Natasha Fatale, you fail to grasp the essence needed to be a victim. But in the spirit of Boris and Natasha, HAMAS tries.

Stop using the word "Respectfully" when you are clearly showing no respect at all, it is a bad habit you seem to think allows you to say what you like, come on Rocco I expect more from you.
With Respect...steven..

(COMMENT)

My choice of "closing" is exactly that; mine. I'm surprised it bothers you so much. You, of course, may ignore it. But the closing is in good faith. I would not bother to reply if I did not respect both you --- and the need for an open discussion.

and stop this Human Shield rubbish...the IDF Zionist Terrorist deliberately murdered this unarmed civilian because he was a Tcun...just admit you support Tcuns..as for Ilove's comment about the 72 Virgins, its an oxymoron abb., MORONIC

(COMMENT)

This nonsense that the IDF is a "terrorist" organization that has been deliberately murdering protestors is just more irrational and immoral propaganda. It is well understood that HAMAS is intentionally staging incidents which provoke events for the media to publish. Though the "March to Return" has not been as bad as expected, most outside observers have seen once again the use of human shields for propaganda purposes. As an example, the use by Hamas of innocent civilians and medical transports and facilities (Medical and UN) for military purposes has been well documented.

Oldest → Newest

1. Hamas Outraged by US ‘Human Shields Prevention Act’ | The ...
   www.jewishpress.com/news/us-news/hamas-outraged-by-us-human...
   Feb 15, 2018 · Hamas Outraged by US ‘Human Shields Prevention Act ... civilians as human shields. ... com/news/us-news/hamas-outraged-by-us-human-shields-prevention ..

1. Hamas Human Shields And Washington Post | The Daily Caller
   dailycaller.com/2018/04/04/hamas-uses-human-shields-and-the...
   Apr 04, 2018 · Hamas, the U.S.-designated terrorist group that rules the Gaza Strip, has a pattern of using civilians as human shields for propaganda purposes. And several major U.S. news outlets have a pattern of helping them achieve this objective. This fact is readily apparent when looking at the media

1. The inhumanity of Hamas' human shields - Washington Times
   https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/may/31/the-inhumanity-of...
   May 31, 2018 · News. Politics; National; ... What Hamas likely won’t admit is that the other Palestinians who died during this altercation were used as human shields to ...

Most Respectfully,
R

Such beastality of thought you spew,considering the history of this schism,the Zionist Terrorists have now taken over Judaism,what a Joke...the converts have taken over the Real Jews.

And don't give me your platitudes,you misunderstand the word Respect,your words and intent are shallow,it does annoy me,because you are not sincere...but only snide like all Zionist Lying Hypocritical Trash.

You should be ashamed of yourself,Rocco the dealer in Death

Thank you for a good laugh!!!

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Always amazes me when people defend terrorists and ignore the murder and mayhem they cause. Pals are terrorists that massed on Israels border with the stated intent to breach the border, they proceeded to attack the Israelis with rocks bombs molotov cocktails and tried repeatedly to cut the fence, and all you retards see is a 'peaceful" protest.

 

[USAF 2023]

Always amazes me when people defend terrorists and ignore the murder and mayhem they cause. Pals are terrorists that massed on Israels border with the stated intent to breach the border, they proceeded to attack the Israelis with rocks bombs molotov cocktails and tried repeatedly to cut the fence, and all you retards see is a 'peaceful" protest.

According to the Pro Palestinian Kool-Aid Drinkers this is their Idea of a “ peaceful protest”

 

[Billo_Really]

Yeah let's bring green peace, let them hold hands around the Israeli villages,
that will do...

No, that won't do. It is required they sing Kum-baya.

 

[Billo_Really]

Just wonder, would she "rescue and shield" the people on the Israeli side as well, when her people rip their hearts out?

I have to think she would.

 

[Billo_Really]

“ Article 51” claims that the U,N Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area

Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.

 

[Billo_Really]

Syria was attacking Israel from Golan Heights. Jordan declared themselves as going with Egypt when Israel was attacked. Nice try!! Every post I have addressed has been in answer to yours. My My hey, hey The Pro Palestinian Hypocrisy is Here to stay

Watch it dude, only I can quote Neil Young.

 

[Billo_Really]

Egypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny

I also like a good book, long walks on the beach and single malt scotch.

 

[Billo_Really]

You ought to know. You’re nothing but a joke

Did you hear about the Jewish kid who asked his father if he could borrow fifty dollars? His father said, "Forty dollars! What do you wanna borrow thirty dollars for?"

 

[USAF 2023]

You ought to know. You’re nothing but a joke

Did you hear about the Jewish kid who asked his father if he could borrow fifty dollars? His father said, "Forty dollars! What do you wanna borrow thirty dollars for?"

Just more proof your nothing but a

 

[theliq]

Israel didn’t initiate a War, try to smuggle weapons in, etc. etc. Let’s have some fun; The way you still blame Israel for their actions I can feel the same way about those in Gaza! Turn about is fair play

Gazans aren't smuggling weapons in when they fish; they are trying to feed their families. Even if they were, why can't the IDF board the Gazan vessel and confiscate the weapons? You know why? Because there ain't any fuckin' weapons to confiscate, because they're FUCKING FISHING!

BTW, yes Israel did initiate the war.

Egypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny

Idiot speaks as Idiot is

You ought to know. You’re nothing but a joke

We all know what U R

 

[USAF 2023]

Israel didn’t initiate a War, try to smuggle weapons in, etc. etc. Let’s have some fun; The way you still blame Israel for their actions I can feel the same way about those in Gaza! Turn about is fair play

Gazans aren't smuggling weapons in when they fish; they are trying to feed their families. Even if they were, why can't the IDF board the Gazan vessel and confiscate the weapons? You know why? Because there ain't any fuckin' weapons to confiscate, because they're FUCKING FISHING!

BTW, yes Israel did initiate the war.

Egypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny

Idiot speaks as Idiot is

You ought to know. You’re nothing but a joke

We all know what U R

You wish.,, Now ho clean yourself

 

[USAF 2023]

Syria was attacking Israel from Golan Heights. Jordan declared themselves as going with Egypt when Israel was attacked. Nice try!! Every post I have addressed has been in answer to yours. My My hey, hey The Pro Palestinian Hypocrisy is Here to stay

Watch it dude, only I can quote Neil Young.

YAWN.,,, probably one of your biggiest accomplishments

 

[theliq]

Syria was attacking Israel from Golan Heights. Jordan declared themselves as going with Egypt when Israel was attacked. Nice try!! Every post I have addressed has been in answer to yours. My My hey, hey The Pro Palestinian Hypocrisy is Here to stay

Watch it dude, only I can quote Neil Young.

YAWN.,,, probably one of your biggiest accomplishments

Stop Using my YAWN response,it merely shows how UNORIGINAL U R,Billo beats you hands down with Truth and Accuracy...You quote Shit and to put your name and that Great Man Neil Young in the same sentence is an Abomination...but he was right though,you should be on Train to Marrakkesh

 

[theliq]

Gazans aren't smuggling weapons in when they fish; they are trying to feed their families. Even if they were, why can't the IDF board the Gazan vessel and confiscate the weapons? You know why? Because there ain't any fuckin' weapons to confiscate, because they're FUCKING FISHING!

BTW, yes Israel did initiate the war.

Egypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny

Idiot speaks as Idiot is

You ought to know. You’re nothing but a joke

We all know what U R

U were about to say ???? Yes the Zionists Murdered the Innocent Medic...YES WE ALREADY KNOW...shit you Zionist shits would argue and lie that Black was White or visa-versa if it suited your Bull SHIT

 

[MJB12741]

Israel didn’t initiate a War, try to smuggle weapons in, etc. etc. Let’s have some fun; The way you still blame Israel for their actions I can feel the same way about those in Gaza! Turn about is fair play

Gazans aren't smuggling weapons in when they fish; they are trying to feed their families. Even if they were, why can't the IDF board the Gazan vessel and confiscate the weapons? You know why? Because there ain't any fuckin' weapons to confiscate, because they're FUCKING FISHING!

BTW, yes Israel did initiate the war.

Egypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny

Idiot speaks as Idiot is

We understand. Don't be so hard on yourself Steve. Always a bogan, eh Steve?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.

The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:

The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.

“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area

Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.

(COMMENT)

However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.

The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.

The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:

• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.

• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.​

There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.

Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[USAF 2023]

Israel didn’t initiate a War, try to smuggle weapons in, etc. etc. Let’s have some fun; The way you still blame Israel for their actions I can feel the same way about those in Gaza! Turn about is fair play

Gazans aren't smuggling weapons in when they fish; they are trying to feed their families. Even if they were, why can't the IDF board the Gazan vessel and confiscate the weapons? You know why? Because there ain't any fuckin' weapons to confiscate, because they're FUCKING FISHING!

BTW, yes Israel did initiate the war.

Egypt blocked the Straits which are International Waters, the U.N. deliberately left but Israel initiated the War? You are actually funny

Idiot speaks as Idiot is

We understand. Don't be so hard on yourself Steve. Always a bogan, eh Steve?

He wishes he was hard. That’s why he is always making reference to his Uncircumcision

 

[montelatici]

RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.

The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:

The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.

“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area

Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.

(COMMENT)

However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.

The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.

The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:

• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.

• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.​

There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.

Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[montelatici]

RE: Gaza volunteer medic killed by israeli sniper
※→ Billo_Really, ILOVEISRAEL, et al,

Let's not quibble over what Article 51 says; let's actually read it and know.

Nothing in the present Charter shall impair the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations, until the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Measures taken by Members in the exercise of this right of self-defence shall be immediately reported to the Security Council and shall not in any way affect the authority and responsibility of the Security Council under the present Charter to take at any time such action as it deems necessary in order to maintain or restore international peace and security.

The Arab Palestinians are currently engaged in an offensive against Israel. The engagement began during the Civil War between the Jewish population and the Muslim/Arab population. This set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have been engaged in a Civil War since ≈ June 1946 - and changed its character in May 1948 when Israel declared independence. In February 1948, the Arab Higher Committee established the central threat that the Arab Palestinians follow to this day:

The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition. The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out — man, woman and child.

“ Article 51” claims that the UN Security Council should try to resolve conflicts before action is taken The U. N. Who intentionally left the area

Article 51 states if you are attacked, you have a right to defend yourself. Otherwise, you need UNSC authorization.

(COMMENT)

However you would categorize the type of conflict, the fact of the matter is that the Arab Palestinians have been locked in conflict with the Israelis continuously since 1946.

The Arab Palestinians have been engaged since before the establishment of the State of Israel and since the establishment of the State of Israel.

The set of non-state actors (Arab Palestinians) have evolved over the last seventy (plus) years, mutating from one group --- to another; but always with the same framework in belief:

• The Arab Higher Committee Delegation wishes to reaffirm here that the Arabs of Palestine cannot recognize the Balfour Declaration, the Mandate of Palestine or any situation arising or derived therefrom.

• The creation of any Jewish state in an Arab territory is more than invasion or aggression, it is something with no precedent in history. It is en act of wiping out the existence of an Arab country, violating its integrity, subjecting its land and people to foreign Jewish domination.​

There is absolutely no question that the Arab Palestinians refused to accept the decisions of the Allied Powers during the period of the Mandate; as well as, refused to accept the ultimate outcomes of the 1948 War of Independence for Israel. And, the Arab Palestinians refuse to accept the Treaty provisions between Egypt and Jordan with the State of Israel. Nor do the Arab Palestinians recognize that the Arab League Forces (Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, and Yemen) fought on behalf of the Arab Palestinians and they collectively suffer the same consequences of the combat outcome and treaty provisions.

Finally, the Arab Palestinians do not understand that the longer they conduct the Jihadism, Fedayeen Action, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence directed against the State of Israel, pretending that they were deposed from the sovereign holdings, the direr the situation becomes for the constituency for a potential State that can stand alone among the other neighboring nations; in a Middle East in Regional Peace and Security.

Most Respectfully,
R