Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Trump has a lot of explaining to do in 2020I expected better performance than ObamaSo, after two quarters as President, the Trump economy has an average GDP of 1.9%
Hardly inspiring so far
A little over six months in office and you are expecting what?
Just be happy the economy did not crash as of yet!
Trump has failed to deliver
We're all going to lose a lot of sleep knowing Trump hasn't secured your vote in 2020 yet.
Trump has a degree in economics from WhartonNo, not hyperbole....outright lyingAbsolutelyI asked you a serious question. It is a serious answer to your question, if you would just answer it.
DId you take him seriously when he called 2.6 % a disaster?
Why would he lie to the American people?
You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
Trump said Obama having GDPs in the 2.5 to 3 range was a disaster
Nope. What you are doing is outright lying.
Trump was being Trump, a loud and hyperbolic New Yorker.
EVERYONE listening, knew that 2.6 per cent growth is not a disaster.
He was making a statement of intent to aggressively pursue much higher rates of growth.
YOu, however, are being a liar, by pretending to take him literally, when you know that he was not being literal.
That you feel you have to play such dishonest games in order to score a point against him, indicates that you think that his intended policies of higher economic growth are real possibilities.
Otherwise, you would be happy to grant my obvious point and then judge Trump on that.
YOu are running scared. From the Truth.
He claims that makes him a really smart guy
If a smart guy like Trump says 2.6 percent is a disaster and he can deliver 4 percent or higher he should be taken seriously. I mean Wharton economics grad and all
So he is either lying about his economic numbers or he is lying about his Wharton education
WASHINGTON/LONDON (Reuters) - U.S. coal exports have jumped more than 60 percent this year due to soaring demand from Europe and Asia, according to a Reuters review of government data, allowing President Donald Trump's administration to claim that efforts to revive the battered industry are working. U.S. coal exports soar, in boost to Trump energy agenda, data shows
Typical brain-dead trumptard sycophancy.AbsolutelyDid you take him seriously when he called 2.6% a disaster?
Did you believe him when he promised 4% growth
Is there anything he does not lie about?
I asked you a serious question. It is a serious answer to your question, if you would just answer it.
DId you take him seriously when he called 2.6 % a disaster?
Why would he lie to the American people?
You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Trump does what he said he would do, he's keeping his campaign promises.
If he doesn't do what he said he would do, he didn't really mean it anyway.
No wonder rightwing cultist boobs love him -- to them, he can do no wrong.
AbsolutelyDid you take him seriously when he called 2.6% a disaster?
Did you believe him when he promised 4% growth
Is there anything he does not lie about?
I asked you a serious question. It is a serious answer to your question, if you would just answer it.
DId you take him seriously when he called 2.6 % a disaster?
Why would he lie to the American people?
You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
You can't give him a pass just because he's a loud New Yorker. If he doesn't achieve 4% growth, then he hasn't achieved what he said he would. You can't lower the bar for him just because he's Trump. Would you have lowered it if Clinton was elected and said the same thing?
You've got to give him time. It's far too early to pass judgment since he hasn't passed any laws that matter yet. But given the current structure of the economy and Trump's inexperience at governing, I'd be extremely surprised if we achieved consistent 4% growth any time soon.
Trump has a lot of explaining to do in 2020I expected better performance than ObamaSo, after two quarters as President, the Trump economy has an average GDP of 1.9%
Hardly inspiring so far
A little over six months in office and you are expecting what?
Just be happy the economy did not crash as of yet!
Trump has failed to deliver
We're all going to lose a lot of sleep knowing Trump hasn't secured your vote in 2020 yet.
Failed to repeal Obamacare
Minimal wall construction
No, Mexico did not pay
No jobs returning from Jina
No tax reform
No balanced budget
Why did you elect him again?
Alright. Let's take Trump seriouslyTrump has a degree in economics from WhartonNo, not hyperbole....outright lyingAbsolutely
Why would he lie to the American people?
You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
Trump said Obama having GDPs in the 2.5 to 3 range was a disaster
Nope. What you are doing is outright lying.
Trump was being Trump, a loud and hyperbolic New Yorker.
EVERYONE listening, knew that 2.6 per cent growth is not a disaster.
He was making a statement of intent to aggressively pursue much higher rates of growth.
YOu, however, are being a liar, by pretending to take him literally, when you know that he was not being literal.
That you feel you have to play such dishonest games in order to score a point against him, indicates that you think that his intended policies of higher economic growth are real possibilities.
Otherwise, you would be happy to grant my obvious point and then judge Trump on that.
YOu are running scared. From the Truth.
He claims that makes him a really smart guy
If a smart guy like Trump says 2.6 percent is a disaster and he can deliver 4 percent or higher he should be taken seriously. I mean Wharton economics grad and all
So he is either lying about his economic numbers or he is lying about his Wharton education
You have a choice between taking Trump seriously and judging him on his policies and position and accomplishments, or lack there of,
or taking Trump literally, and playing silly gotcha games.
I can see why you would want to avoid serious and honest debate.
You are confident that Trump is going to achieve a reasonable level of success, ie better economic growth, and you want to avoid that discuss at all costs.
At least that is what your actions demonstrate.
And if he fails to deliver by 2020Trump has a lot of explaining to do in 2020I expected better performance than ObamaSo, after two quarters as President, the Trump economy has an average GDP of 1.9%
Hardly inspiring so far
A little over six months in office and you are expecting what?
Just be happy the economy did not crash as of yet!
Trump has failed to deliver
We're all going to lose a lot of sleep knowing Trump hasn't secured your vote in 2020 yet.
Failed to repeal Obamacare
Minimal wall construction
No, Mexico did not pay
No jobs returning from Jina
No tax reform
No balanced budget
Why did you elect him again?
Today's date, 2017.
Barry's average annual growth rate was a stunning 1.48% and had not even one year of 3% GDP growth, which I think is a presidential record. He thought the robust surge in the sale of Mom jeans was gonna put him over the top but that boom fizzled.After a lackluster 1.2% in the first quarter of 2017. GDP returned to Obama-like numbers of 2.6% in the second quarter
Still, far below the 4% growth that Trump promised
U.S. economy accelerated during first full Trump quarter
x
Typical brain-dead trumptard sycophancy.AbsolutelyDid you believe him when he promised 4% growth
Is there anything he does not lie about?
I asked you a serious question. It is a serious answer to your question, if you would just answer it.
DId you take him seriously when he called 2.6 % a disaster?
Why would he lie to the American people?
You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Trump does what he said he would do, he's keeping his campaign promises.
If he doesn't do what he said he would do, he didn't really mean it anyway.
No wonder rightwing cultist boobs love him -- to them, he can do no wrong.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
AbsolutelyDid you believe him when he promised 4% growth
Is there anything he does not lie about?
I asked you a serious question. It is a serious answer to your question, if you would just answer it.
DId you take him seriously when he called 2.6 % a disaster?
Why would he lie to the American people?
You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
You can't give him a pass just because he's a loud New Yorker. If he doesn't achieve 4% growth, then he hasn't achieved what he said he would. You can't lower the bar for him just because he's Trump. Would you have lowered it if Clinton was elected and said the same thing?
You've got to give him time. It's far too early to pass judgment since he hasn't passed any laws that matter yet. But given the current structure of the economy and Trump's inexperience at governing, I'd be extremely surprised if we achieved consistent 4% growth any time soon.
If he leaves office, with growth at 3.5% and exports surging and working class and middle class wages rising due to increase manufacturing and decreased immigration, and crime falling,
I'll take that as a win.
And I would have judged Hillary the same, (if increased immigration led to rising wages somehow) if she achieved similar results.
Alright. Let's take Trump seriouslyTrump has a degree in economics from WhartonNo, not hyperbole....outright lyingYou just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
Trump said Obama having GDPs in the 2.5 to 3 range was a disaster
Nope. What you are doing is outright lying.
Trump was being Trump, a loud and hyperbolic New Yorker.
EVERYONE listening, knew that 2.6 per cent growth is not a disaster.
He was making a statement of intent to aggressively pursue much higher rates of growth.
YOu, however, are being a liar, by pretending to take him literally, when you know that he was not being literal.
That you feel you have to play such dishonest games in order to score a point against him, indicates that you think that his intended policies of higher economic growth are real possibilities.
Otherwise, you would be happy to grant my obvious point and then judge Trump on that.
YOu are running scared. From the Truth.
He claims that makes him a really smart guy
If a smart guy like Trump says 2.6 percent is a disaster and he can deliver 4 percent or higher he should be taken seriously. I mean Wharton economics grad and all
So he is either lying about his economic numbers or he is lying about his Wharton education
You have a choice between taking Trump seriously and judging him on his policies and position and accomplishments, or lack there of,
or taking Trump literally, and playing silly gotcha games.
I can see why you would want to avoid serious and honest debate.
You are confident that Trump is going to achieve a reasonable level of success, ie better economic growth, and you want to avoid that discuss at all costs.
At least that is what your actions demonstrate.
He has a degree in economics from a prestigious University. I took Macroeconomics 101 40 years ago. Yet, I have a better understanding of GDP than Trump seems to have
Trumps "projections" are laughable to anyone with any understanding of economics. Someone with a degree in economics should be able to fake it better than Trump seems able to do.
I seriously question his degree in economics
And if he fails to deliver by 2020Trump has a lot of explaining to do in 2020I expected better performance than ObamaA little over six months in office and you are expecting what?
Just be happy the economy did not crash as of yet!
Trump has failed to deliver
We're all going to lose a lot of sleep knowing Trump hasn't secured your vote in 2020 yet.
Failed to repeal Obamacare
Minimal wall construction
No, Mexico did not pay
No jobs returning from Jina
No tax reform
No balanced budget
Why did you elect him again?
Today's date, 2017.
Are you ready to throw him under the bus or just make more excuses for Trump?
Typical brain-dead trumptard sycophancy.AbsolutelyI asked you a serious question. It is a serious answer to your question, if you would just answer it.
DId you take him seriously when he called 2.6 % a disaster?
Why would he lie to the American people?
You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Trump does what he said he would do, he's keeping his campaign promises.
If he doesn't do what he said he would do, he didn't really mean it anyway.
No wonder rightwing cultist boobs love him -- to them, he can do no wrong.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
Hyperbole is bragging. I'm the best, I will do better than Obama, I will make America Great Again
Saying the economy is going to grow at 4% if you are elected, that Mexico will pay for the wall, that jobs will return from China is not hyperbole. Those are specific, measurable promises that you will be measured against. If he had no intention of meeting those claims then that is a lie....not hyperbole
LOLTrump has a lot of explaining to do in 2020I expected better performance than ObamaSo, after two quarters as President, the Trump economy has an average GDP of 1.9%
Hardly inspiring so far
A little over six months in office and you are expecting what?
Just be happy the economy did not crash as of yet!
Trump has failed to deliver
We're all going to lose a lot of sleep knowing Trump hasn't secured your vote in 2020 yet.
Failed to repeal Obamacare
Minimal wall construction
No, Mexico did not pay
No jobs returning from Jina
No tax reform
No balanced budget
Why did you elect him again?
.
Trump drew his own line on what he will be evaluated againstTypical brain-dead trumptard sycophancy.Absolutely
Why would he lie to the American people?
You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Trump does what he said he would do, he's keeping his campaign promises.
If he doesn't do what he said he would do, he didn't really mean it anyway.
No wonder rightwing cultist boobs love him -- to them, he can do no wrong.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
Hyperbole is bragging. I'm the best, I will do better than Obama, I will make America Great Again
Saying the economy is going to grow at 4% if you are elected, that Mexico will pay for the wall, that jobs will return from China is not hyperbole. Those are specific, measurable promises that you will be measured against. If he had no intention of meeting those claims then that is a lie....not hyperbole
Standard lib tactic.
LIe about what a word means, then attack your enemy based on your made up bullshit.
THis is the actual definition of hyperbole.
hy·per·bo·le
hīˈpərbəlē/
noun
- exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
synonyms: exaggeration, overstatement, magnification, embroidery, embellishment, excess, overkill, rhetoric;
Thus, as we see, your claim that hyperbole has to be personal bragging is revealed to be a lie.
MY point, that his overblown promises, were hyperbole, is shown to be keeping in line with the REAL ACTUAL DEFINITION OF THE WORD.
Also, as you lied about the word, and I did not, my credibility is bolstered while your is undercut, by your own actions.
My point stands.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
And if FROGS HAD WINGS they wouldn't bump their butts when they jumped.Trump drew his own line on what he will be evaluated againstTypical brain-dead trumptard sycophancy.You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Trump does what he said he would do, he's keeping his campaign promises.
If he doesn't do what he said he would do, he didn't really mean it anyway.
No wonder rightwing cultist boobs love him -- to them, he can do no wrong.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
Hyperbole is bragging. I'm the best, I will do better than Obama, I will make America Great Again
Saying the economy is going to grow at 4% if you are elected, that Mexico will pay for the wall, that jobs will return from China is not hyperbole. Those are specific, measurable promises that you will be measured against. If he had no intention of meeting those claims then that is a lie....not hyperbole
Standard lib tactic.
LIe about what a word means, then attack your enemy based on your made up bullshit.
THis is the actual definition of hyperbole.
hy·per·bo·le
hīˈpərbəlē/
noun
- exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
synonyms: exaggeration, overstatement, magnification, embroidery, embellishment, excess, overkill, rhetoric;
Thus, as we see, your claim that hyperbole has to be personal bragging is revealed to be a lie.
MY point, that his overblown promises, were hyperbole, is shown to be keeping in line with the REAL ACTUAL DEFINITION OF THE WORD.
Also, as you lied about the word, and I did not, my credibility is bolstered while your is undercut, by your own actions.
My point stands.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Obama having 2.6 percent GDP is a disaster, then 2.6 percent is a disaster for Trump
If he promises 4 percent growth, then 4 percent is what he gets measured against
If he said he would make Mexico pay for the wall, then he gets evaluated on whether he did it
If Trump made claims he can't deliver, then it is his fault for saying it.....not our fault for holding him to it
Trump drew his own line on what he will be evaluated againstTypical brain-dead trumptard sycophancy.You just lied.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
That you felt a need to lie, shows that you know that you are in the wrong. Yet you actively choose to be wrong, and to argue for positions that you do not believe in.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Trump does what he said he would do, he's keeping his campaign promises.
If he doesn't do what he said he would do, he didn't really mean it anyway.
No wonder rightwing cultist boobs love him -- to them, he can do no wrong.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
Hyperbole is bragging. I'm the best, I will do better than Obama, I will make America Great Again
Saying the economy is going to grow at 4% if you are elected, that Mexico will pay for the wall, that jobs will return from China is not hyperbole. Those are specific, measurable promises that you will be measured against. If he had no intention of meeting those claims then that is a lie....not hyperbole
Standard lib tactic.
LIe about what a word means, then attack your enemy based on your made up bullshit.
THis is the actual definition of hyperbole.
hy·per·bo·le
hīˈpərbəlē/
noun
- exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
synonyms: exaggeration, overstatement, magnification, embroidery, embellishment, excess, overkill, rhetoric;
Thus, as we see, your claim that hyperbole has to be personal bragging is revealed to be a lie.
MY point, that his overblown promises, were hyperbole, is shown to be keeping in line with the REAL ACTUAL DEFINITION OF THE WORD.
Also, as you lied about the word, and I did not, my credibility is bolstered while your is undercut, by your own actions.
My point stands.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Obama having 2.6 percent GDP is a disaster, then 2.6 percent is a disaster for Trump
If he promises 4 percent growth, then 4 percent is what he gets measured against
If he said he would make Mexico pay for the wall, then he gets evaluated on whether he did it
If Trump made claims he can't deliver, then it is his fault for saying it.....not our fault for holding him to it
If Trump delivered four percent growth like he promised, I would be applaudingAnd if FROGS HAD WINGS they wouldn't bump their butts when they jumped.Trump drew his own line on what he will be evaluated againstTypical brain-dead trumptard sycophancy.
If Trump does what he said he would do, he's keeping his campaign promises.
If he doesn't do what he said he would do, he didn't really mean it anyway.
No wonder rightwing cultist boobs love him -- to them, he can do no wrong.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
Hyperbole is bragging. I'm the best, I will do better than Obama, I will make America Great Again
Saying the economy is going to grow at 4% if you are elected, that Mexico will pay for the wall, that jobs will return from China is not hyperbole. Those are specific, measurable promises that you will be measured against. If he had no intention of meeting those claims then that is a lie....not hyperbole
Standard lib tactic.
LIe about what a word means, then attack your enemy based on your made up bullshit.
THis is the actual definition of hyperbole.
hy·per·bo·le
hīˈpərbəlē/
noun
- exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
synonyms: exaggeration, overstatement, magnification, embroidery, embellishment, excess, overkill, rhetoric;
Thus, as we see, your claim that hyperbole has to be personal bragging is revealed to be a lie.
MY point, that his overblown promises, were hyperbole, is shown to be keeping in line with the REAL ACTUAL DEFINITION OF THE WORD.
Also, as you lied about the word, and I did not, my credibility is bolstered while your is undercut, by your own actions.
My point stands.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Obama having 2.6 percent GDP is a disaster, then 2.6 percent is a disaster for Trump
If he promises 4 percent growth, then 4 percent is what he gets measured against
If he said he would make Mexico pay for the wall, then he gets evaluated on whether he did it
If Trump made claims he can't deliver, then it is his fault for saying it.....not our fault for holding him to it
If the percentage had been HIGHER TODAY...........You would be saying this was OBAMA DOING IT...........If it's BAD.........then it's TRUMP DOING IT.
Only LONG TERM INCREASES or DECREASES will eventually matter and ONLY AFTER implementation of new policy.
The economic benefits of new laws and policies will NOT BE FELT IMMEDIATELY........they never do................
Down the road will be the real results of new policy.......Not specifically today.
Trump set the standards he would be evaluated againstTrump drew his own line on what he will be evaluated againstTypical brain-dead trumptard sycophancy.
If Trump does what he said he would do, he's keeping his campaign promises.
If he doesn't do what he said he would do, he didn't really mean it anyway.
No wonder rightwing cultist boobs love him -- to them, he can do no wrong.
It is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
Hyperbole is bragging. I'm the best, I will do better than Obama, I will make America Great Again
Saying the economy is going to grow at 4% if you are elected, that Mexico will pay for the wall, that jobs will return from China is not hyperbole. Those are specific, measurable promises that you will be measured against. If he had no intention of meeting those claims then that is a lie....not hyperbole
Standard lib tactic.
LIe about what a word means, then attack your enemy based on your made up bullshit.
THis is the actual definition of hyperbole.
hy·per·bo·le
hīˈpərbəlē/
noun
- exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
synonyms: exaggeration, overstatement, magnification, embroidery, embellishment, excess, overkill, rhetoric;
Thus, as we see, your claim that hyperbole has to be personal bragging is revealed to be a lie.
MY point, that his overblown promises, were hyperbole, is shown to be keeping in line with the REAL ACTUAL DEFINITION OF THE WORD.
Also, as you lied about the word, and I did not, my credibility is bolstered while your is undercut, by your own actions.
My point stands.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Obama having 2.6 percent GDP is a disaster, then 2.6 percent is a disaster for Trump
If he promises 4 percent growth, then 4 percent is what he gets measured against
If he said he would make Mexico pay for the wall, then he gets evaluated on whether he did it
If Trump made claims he can't deliver, then it is his fault for saying it.....not our fault for holding him to it
I've addressed all of that already and caught you lying.
Now you just ignored our entire discussion to repeat your initial position.
THat is the Logical Fallacy of Proof by Repetition used as propaganda.
You have implicitly admitted that you know that you cannot defend your position honestly.
THus, you lose, and your post is invalid.
My point stands as the final word, unless you choose to stop playing with logical fallacies and engage in real dialog.
Here is the final point, where the discussion broke down.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Trump delivered four percent growth like he promised, I would be applaudingAnd if FROGS HAD WINGS they wouldn't bump their butts when they jumped.Trump drew his own line on what he will be evaluated againstIt is not credible that you did not note that he is regular user of hyperbole.
Hyperbole is bragging. I'm the best, I will do better than Obama, I will make America Great Again
Saying the economy is going to grow at 4% if you are elected, that Mexico will pay for the wall, that jobs will return from China is not hyperbole. Those are specific, measurable promises that you will be measured against. If he had no intention of meeting those claims then that is a lie....not hyperbole
Standard lib tactic.
LIe about what a word means, then attack your enemy based on your made up bullshit.
THis is the actual definition of hyperbole.
hy·per·bo·le
hīˈpərbəlē/
noun
- exaggerated statements or claims not meant to be taken literally.
synonyms: exaggeration, overstatement, magnification, embroidery, embellishment, excess, overkill, rhetoric;
Thus, as we see, your claim that hyperbole has to be personal bragging is revealed to be a lie.
MY point, that his overblown promises, were hyperbole, is shown to be keeping in line with the REAL ACTUAL DEFINITION OF THE WORD.
Also, as you lied about the word, and I did not, my credibility is bolstered while your is undercut, by your own actions.
My point stands.
Trump's comments on 2.6% and 4% was a hyperbolic statement of intent to be more aggressive in economic policy, aiming for higher rates of growth.
This is the standard to hold him to, if he makes a good faith effort to do that, and what results he gets.
DO you think that judging him on those standards will work for you?
Because you are acting like you don't believe that.
If Obama having 2.6 percent GDP is a disaster, then 2.6 percent is a disaster for Trump
If he promises 4 percent growth, then 4 percent is what he gets measured against
If he said he would make Mexico pay for the wall, then he gets evaluated on whether he did it
If Trump made claims he can't deliver, then it is his fault for saying it.....not our fault for holding him to it
If the percentage had been HIGHER TODAY...........You would be saying this was OBAMA DOING IT...........If it's BAD.........then it's TRUMP DOING IT.
Only LONG TERM INCREASES or DECREASES will eventually matter and ONLY AFTER implementation of new policy.
The economic benefits of new laws and policies will NOT BE FELT IMMEDIATELY........they never do................
Down the road will be the real results of new policy.......Not specifically today.
Since he is delivering less than half of what he promised, I have to call him on it
