George Zimmerman banned from Tinder dating app

Beating someone up who starts a fight with you is not thuggery, it’s self defense.
Only to the point where the violence is stopped.

SITTING ON TOP OF HIM BEATING THE FUCK OUT OF HIS HEAD IS NOT SELF DEFENSE!!!!


.

Exactly....and there is witness testimony to that as well as the forensic report which demonstrated that the fatal shot was fired into trayvon whilst he was on top of Z.

Do these morons not understand that the jury spent hours examining all this evidence (and they were no friends of Z) and thus were compelled by the evidence and the law to declare Z was not guilty.

Gunshot wound expert: Evidence supports Zimmerman's account of fatal encounter - NBC News
 
.
Beating someone up who starts a fight with you is not thuggery, it’s self defense.
Only to the point where the violence is stopped.

SITTING ON TOP OF HIM BEATING THE FUCK OUT OF HIS HEAD IS NOT SELF DEFENSE!!!!


.

Exactly....and there is witness testimony to that as well as the forensic report which demonstrated that the fatal shot was fired into trayvon whilst he was on top of Z.

Do these morons not understand that the jury spent hours examining all this evidence (and they were no friends of Z) and thus were compelled by the evidence and the law to declare Z was not guilty.

Gunshot wound expert: Evidence supports Zimmerman's account of fatal encounter - NBC News

He was found not guilty of 2nd degree murder which was the correct verdict for that charge. The prosecution was incompetent. They had a much better chance if they started with manslaughter from day 1.

btw... I always wondered how Zimmerman had the wherewithal to pull his gun out and shoot while getting his head slammed into the ground.
 
.
Beating someone up who starts a fight with you is not thuggery, it’s self defense.
Only to the point where the violence is stopped.

SITTING ON TOP OF HIM BEATING THE FUCK OUT OF HIS HEAD IS NOT SELF DEFENSE!!!!


.

Exactly....and there is witness testimony to that as well as the forensic report which demonstrated that the fatal shot was fired into trayvon whilst he was on top of Z.

Do these morons not understand that the jury spent hours examining all this evidence (and they were no friends of Z) and thus were compelled by the evidence and the law to declare Z was not guilty.

Gunshot wound expert: Evidence supports Zimmerman's account of fatal encounter - NBC News

He was found not guilty of 2nd degree murder which was the correct verdict for that charge. The prosecution was incompetent. They had a much better chance if they started with manslaughter from day 1.

btw... I always wondered how Zimmerman had the wherewithal to pull his gun out and shoot while getting his head slammed into the ground.


I can see how you wouldnt since your just a pansy,,,

its called fighting for your life,,,,and training,,,cops and military do it everyday,,,
 
.
Beating someone up who starts a fight with you is not thuggery, it’s self defense.
Only to the point where the violence is stopped.

SITTING ON TOP OF HIM BEATING THE FUCK OUT OF HIS HEAD IS NOT SELF DEFENSE!!!!


.

Exactly....and there is witness testimony to that as well as the forensic report which demonstrated that the fatal shot was fired into trayvon whilst he was on top of Z.

Do these morons not understand that the jury spent hours examining all this evidence (and they were no friends of Z) and thus were compelled by the evidence and the law to declare Z was not guilty.

Gunshot wound expert: Evidence supports Zimmerman's account of fatal encounter - NBC News

He was found not guilty of 2nd degree murder which was the correct verdict for that charge. The prosecution was incompetent. They had a much better chance if they started with manslaughter from day 1.

btw... I always wondered how Zimmerman had the wherewithal to pull his gun out and shoot while getting his head slammed into the ground.


I can see how you wouldnt since your just a pansy,,,

its called fighting for your life,,,,and training,,,cops and military do it everyday,,,

Unlike you I don't get my courage from carrying a gun. Who's the pansy now? If I had chose to confront and question Martin I would not have had a gun. It's possible one of us would have walked away with some bruises and blood. But we both would have walked away alive. But then again, I don't profile and pursue teenagers walking through my neighborhood while armed.

btw... your name calling is losing you the debate. Your bias against blacks is quite obvious.
 
.
Beating someone up who starts a fight with you is not thuggery, it’s self defense.
Only to the point where the violence is stopped.

SITTING ON TOP OF HIM BEATING THE FUCK OUT OF HIS HEAD IS NOT SELF DEFENSE!!!!


.

Exactly....and there is witness testimony to that as well as the forensic report which demonstrated that the fatal shot was fired into trayvon whilst he was on top of Z.

Do these morons not understand that the jury spent hours examining all this evidence (and they were no friends of Z) and thus were compelled by the evidence and the law to declare Z was not guilty.

Gunshot wound expert: Evidence supports Zimmerman's account of fatal encounter - NBC News

He was found not guilty of 2nd degree murder which was the correct verdict for that charge. The prosecution was incompetent. They had a much better chance if they started with manslaughter from day 1.

btw... I always wondered how Zimmerman had the wherewithal to pull his gun out and shoot while getting his head slammed into the ground.


I can see how you wouldnt since your just a pansy,,,

its called fighting for your life,,,,and training,,,cops and military do it everyday,,,

Unlike you I don't get my courage from carrying a gun. Who's the pansy now? If I had chose to confront and question Martin I would not have had a gun. It's possible one of us would have walked away with some bruises and blood. But we both would have walked away alive. But then again, I don't profile and pursue teenagers walking through my neighborhood while armed.

btw... your name calling is losing you the debate. Your bias against blacks is quite obvious.


well Z didnt confront TM,,,it was the other way around,,and based on the evidence if he didnt have a gun Z would most likely be dead as would you,,,
 
Not necessarily. If someone attacks you and you beat the shit out of them, how does that make you a thug? No one but Zimmerman knows who started the fight between him and Trayvon.
Do you understand the concept of reasonable force?

Even if Zimmerman started the fight (highly unlikely), any defense that aggression gave TM went away when TM was on top of GZ beating the fuck out of him.

THAT IS THUGGERY!!!!

121203083453-zimmerman-blood-story-top.jpg


images
Beating someone up who starts a fight with you is not thuggery, it’s self defense. Not saying Zimmerman started the fight as no one knows who started it, but there is no proof Martin did. And Zimmerman’s injuries were so minor, he didn’t need to go to a hospital. Paramedics put a bandaid on his boo-boo and he went home.


Trayvon had gone home to where his father was staying....he was completely safe there...as confirmed and testified to by the State's star witness trayvon's g/f who said Trayvon had returned to his father's place....that is indisputable. There can be no question about that.

By returning to confront George all the blame must be placed on Trayvon...he had no business going back....Trayvon returning to the area proves he was up to no good....that he was the instigator....no other reason for him to go back but to confront George.
Maybe he didn’t feel safe there. Maybe he wasn’t sure if Zimmerman saw where he was staying.
 
Unlike you I don't get my courage from carrying a gun.
Oh, you are such a bad ass.

It's possible one of us would have walked away with some bruises and blood. But we both would have walked away alive.
This statement tells me you know nothing about fighting. In other words, you are not a bad ass.

btw... your name calling is losing you the debate. Your bias against blacks is quite obvious.
Calling one black kid a thug is not condemning an entire race. What are you talking about?
 
What criminal history? He was never arrested.
lots of criminals havent been arrested,,,
LOLOL

Zimmerman has been arrested more than Martin.
but its TM thats dead because hes a dumbass thug
Still waiting for your evidence that Martin was a thug? I guess your evidence of that is somewhere lost with your evidence I claimed Zimmerman was guilty of murder. :dunno:
alreeady presented it,,,just because you disagree ndoesnt mean its not true,,,
You presented nothing but your opinion that he was a thug. Your opinion is not evidence.
 
He didn’t “beat the fuck out of his head.” Again, lol Zimmerman needed was a bandage.
Pictures prove otherwise.

Are you telling me that Zimmerman was not justified in using deadly force to stop Martin from sitting on top of him, hitting him in the face/head?

Is that what you're going with?

:laughing0301:

.
 
.
Only to the point where the violence is stopped.

SITTING ON TOP OF HIM BEATING THE FUCK OUT OF HIS HEAD IS NOT SELF DEFENSE!!!!


.

Exactly....and there is witness testimony to that as well as the forensic report which demonstrated that the fatal shot was fired into trayvon whilst he was on top of Z.

Do these morons not understand that the jury spent hours examining all this evidence (and they were no friends of Z) and thus were compelled by the evidence and the law to declare Z was not guilty.

Gunshot wound expert: Evidence supports Zimmerman's account of fatal encounter - NBC News

He was found not guilty of 2nd degree murder which was the correct verdict for that charge. The prosecution was incompetent. They had a much better chance if they started with manslaughter from day 1.

btw... I always wondered how Zimmerman had the wherewithal to pull his gun out and shoot while getting his head slammed into the ground.


I can see how you wouldnt since your just a pansy,,,

its called fighting for your life,,,,and training,,,cops and military do it everyday,,,

Unlike you I don't get my courage from carrying a gun. Who's the pansy now? If I had chose to confront and question Martin I would not have had a gun. It's possible one of us would have walked away with some bruises and blood. But we both would have walked away alive. But then again, I don't profile and pursue teenagers walking through my neighborhood while armed.

btw... your name calling is losing you the debate. Your bias against blacks is quite obvious.


well Z didnt confront TM,,,it was the other way around,,and based on the evidence if he didnt have a gun Z would most likely be dead as would you,,,

I wouldn't be dead because I would have kept driving to the store and not assumed some black kid was out to rob the neighborhood. IF I did stop I and decided to call police I would not have gotten out of my car. IF I did get out of my car, knowing I was armed, I would have stayed close to my car in well lit area. The last thing I would want to do it pursue someone down a dimly lit path and have my gun taken away. Even worse, I don't want to incite a situation where I have to pull my gun out. It's not my job to play police officer.
 
You presented nothing but your opinion that he was a thug. Your opinion is not evidence.
The evidence shows that Martin was headed for a life of crime. He may have gone straight as an adult, but past conduct is a pretty good indicator of future behavior. Plus, there was the whole sitting on top of GZ, punching and attempting to bang his head on the concrete. That's also evidence.
:dunno:
 
Wrong. He said Martin was running "towards the other entrance" as he exited his vehicle.

After getting out of his vehicle, the dispatcher asked Zimmerman, "which entrance is that that he's heading towards?" To which Zimmerman answered, "the back entrance," as he went running after Martin.

So no, you're full of shit when you falsely claim he only got out of his vehicle because he lost sight of him. Zimmerman saw the direction he took off in.

After exiting his vehicle and after informing the dispatcher the direction he observed Martin running, Zimmerman was asked if he was following Martin; and was told he needn't do so by the dispatcher. Then Zimmerman was asked his name, which he gave, and also informed the dispatcher Martin ran. By then he lost sight of him -- but that was after getting out of his truck.

And Martin had good reason not to run straight back to his father's apartment.... Being chased by a crazed guy, why would he lead a nut to where he was staying and to where 14 year old Chad Green was home alone?

The state's star witness...Trayvon's friend...testified Trayvon told her he had returned to his father's place.

It has been shown he had plenty of time to do that...more time than he needed actually as it was a very short distance away...between 80 and a hundred yards....how long does it take a football player to run 100 yards...you do the math.

Again...Z had lost sight of Trayvon very quickly after he took off raining it was a dark and rainy night...Z was simply walking in the direction he had seen Trayvon run off to...aka...attempting to follow or perhaps see if Trayvon was anywhere visible...he was not...dispatch heard the wind in Z's phone and axed him if he was following Trayvon Z replied in the affirmative meaning he was attempting to follow trayvon....you cannot follow someone you cannot see. Simple stuff.
You claimed Zimmerman got out of his vehicle when he lost sight of Trayvon. Zimmerman’s own description of events proves that is false.

so now you claim Z is credible....hehheh

You cannot have it both ways....either he is credible or he is not...make up your mind.

Again....the best truth available on this case......................The Aftermath of the George Zimmerman Case, Part 1: The Trial, the Evidence and the Verdict
He said he could see where Trayvon ran off to and described it to 911. I find that believable as there’s no reason to lie about that.

You lied though. You said Zimmerman got out of his vehicle after losing sight of Trayvon.

Have you ever tried to observe someone on a dark and rainy night? One second you can see them and the next you cannot...in the truck one has to look out the windshield...of course your vision is better if you are out of the vehicle....Z...reported to dispatch several times he had lost sight of Trayon ...it is documented on tape.

You can argue all you want about the exact moment Z lost sight...but reality dictates for a period of time in a situation like that..one moment you can see and the next you cannot and it goes back and forth like that until the person you are trying to observe disappears completely....and that is what happened ....Trayvon disappeard completely....thus no way for Z to follow him.

All Z could do was to walk in the direction where Trayvon had disappeared to...in order to see if was still in that area....but Trayvon was long gone...being a football player and a sprinter...he covered that 80 yards to his fathers house in around 20 secs. and thus completely safe whilst Z was looking for him out in the dark on that rainy night.

BTW Again...it was within Z's right to follow or more realistically to attempt to follow....nothing illegal about that at all. The dispatcher suggested they did not need for hm to do that...but it was his legal right to do so if he wanted....but the evidence shows he complied with the dispatchers suggestion.
LOLOL

You fucking lied ... and got caught lying. Deal with it.

Zimmerman did not get out of his vehicle because he lost sight of Trayvon. He got out of his truck because he didn’t want to lose sight of him and Trayvon took off in between buildings where Zimmerman couldn’t drive.
 
I wouldn't be dead because I would have kept driving to the store and not assumed some black kid was out to rob the neighborhood. IF I did stop I and decided to call police I would not have gotten out of my car. IF I did get out of my car, knowing I was armed, I would have stayed close to my car in well lit area. The last thing I would want to do it pursue someone down a dimly lit path and have my gun taken away. Even worse, I don't want to incite a situation where I have to pull my gun out. It's not my job to play police officer.
Zimmerman was stupid. Nobody is excusing his stupidity.

All of it points to his stupid decision getting him attacked by a thug.

Good thing his dumb ass was armed or he may have been beat to death.

.
 
It shows a pattern of nothing. What is this "burglary tool?" It sounds made up.
A burglary tool is anything that can be used to break and enter, but is ALWAYS accompanied by goods acquired via burglary. It is nothing more than evidence that the items discovered were, in fact, taken by use of said tool.

I am not going to sit here and educate you on this shit. You know good and fucking damn well that Martin was headed for a life of crime and the authorities ignored it, rather than taking measures to put him on the right path.
Trayvon Martin had no criminal record. He's never been arrested.
Which means jack shit, given the policy of Miami-Dade.

George Zimmerman, on the other hand, had an extensive criminal record, and had been arrested numerous times, including for fighting a cop.
Never said GZ was a "good guy" one time. NEVER.

You're so anti-black that you support a murder of one of their youngsters by a common thug?
Go fuck yourself.

A thug who will not let an alleged assailant flee is not acting in self defense. He is acting like a thug. Don't sit here and defend that bullshit.
You're so fucking anti-white, you think black kids should be allowed to beat the fuck out of "white" dudes and NOT get shot when they refuse to STOP beating the shit out of said "white" dude. (GZ is latino)

hehheh The prosecution invented a new racial classification for Z....a white hispanic.
Umm, that’s not a new classification. Hispanic can be white or non-white.
 
Unlike you I don't get my courage from carrying a gun.
Oh, you are such a bad ass.

It's possible one of us would have walked away with some bruises and blood. But we both would have walked away alive.
This statement tells me you know nothing about fighting. In other words, you are not a bad ass.

btw... your name calling is losing you the debate. Your bias against blacks is quite obvious.
Calling one black kid a thug is not condemning an entire race. What are you talking about?

Insightful comments. Thank you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top