George Zimmerman

[Rat in the Hat]

This was obviously a very biased juror from the start. The State should appeal the verdict based on her clearly stated bias.

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the State can't appeal the verdict.

The term for that would be "double jeopardy".

In some juristictions, the State can appeal a verdict. I don't know about this type of verdict, but it is possible and has been done in certain trials before. Where there is jury misconduct, or if a juror lied about things when being questioned for jury duty, something should be able to be done. She is/was very obviously biased.

Sorry, but you're wrong. Once the verdict is in, the State can not appeal for any reason.

In the instances you cite, the State would bring charges against the juror(s) involved.

 

[High_Gravity]

What happened to Warrior?

 

[R.C. Christian]

Jeantel stopped being a helpful teenage girl when she started making the rounds of whatever talk shows that would have her.

That's a good point. It's a selfish thing to do and it serves no purpose other to make profits for the MSM and the black girl who will most likely squander her earnings on something irrelevant to the issue. It's a fucking joke.

 

[Esmeralda]

Not to put too fine a point on it, but the State can't appeal the verdict.

The term for that would be "double jeopardy".

In some juristictions, the State can appeal a verdict. I don't know about this type of verdict, but it is possible and has been done in certain trials before. Where there is jury misconduct, or if a juror lied about things when being questioned for jury duty, something should be able to be done. She is/was very obviously biased.

Sorry, but you're wrong. Once the verdict is in, the State can not appeal for any reason.

In the instances you cite, the State would bring charges against the juror(s) involved.

I looked it up. Because of double jeopardy, mostly if a person is tried and acquited, the State cannot appeal. The one exception seems to be if the person tried bribed the jury or judge. That then means he/she was never in jeopardy, so can be retried on the same charge. However, in some civil types of trials, the State can appeal the verdict.

 

[asterism]

He was walking alone at night in the rain and looking into windows. That's certainly suspicious.

He was walking at the dinner hour - 7:00 pm - and there is no evidence he was not on the sidewalk or 'looking in windows'

In the summer months, that would be daylight, with guys on the 14th hole with plenty of time to finish.

But it was winter so that meant it was dark and it was raining. That's suspicious.

 

[asterism]

Legality of them is one thing; using common sense is another. He did not use common sense, nor did he use the guidelines of the Neighborhood Watch program, which is NOT to carry a weapon. The fact that it was legal to carry a weapon doesn't make it smart or ethically right to carry one. That's the problem here: you pro-gun people are so hung up on the legal right to carry a gun, you don't care who gets murdered. You don't care about anything else except the legal right to have a gun.

That's the problem here: you pro-gun people are so hung up on the legal right to carry a gun, you don't care who gets murdered.

We do care. The gun prevented a murder.

Zimmerman's life was never in danger. His injuries were superficial and "insigniciant."

Only according to one person that never actually examined him. This is the same M.E. that is facing multiple complaints for unprofessional conduct.

 

[drivebymedia]

I would suspect there are dozens of legal staff studying "juror misconduct. before and after a verdict"

I doubt anyone with any knowledge of the subjects posts on these boards.

 

[dilloduck]

I would suspect there are dozens of legal staff studying "juror misconduct. before and after a verdict"

I doubt anyone with any knowledge of the subjects posts on these boards.

Hey I trust you about everything--go ahead and fill us in

 

[drivebymedia]

He was walking alone at night in the rain and looking into windows. That's certainly suspicious.

He was walking at the dinner hour - 7:00 pm - and there is no evidence he was not on the sidewalk or 'looking in windows'

In the summer months, that would be daylight, with guys on the 14th hole with plenty of time to finish.

But it was winter so that meant it was dark and it was raining. That's suspicious.

If walking at 7:00 pm in the rain is suspicious in America, god help you if you don't have a gun.

Gun manufacturers and NRA love that idea.

 

[Meister]

In some juristictions, the State can appeal a verdict. I don't know about this type of verdict, but it is possible and has been done in certain trials before. Where there is jury misconduct, or if a juror lied about things when being questioned for jury duty, something should be able to be done. She is/was very obviously biased.

Sorry, but you're wrong. Once the verdict is in, the State can not appeal for any reason.

In the instances you cite, the State would bring charges against the juror(s) involved.

I looked it up. Because of double jeopardy, mostly if a person is tried and acquited, the State cannot appeal. The one exception seems to be if the person tried bribed the jury or judge. That then means he/she was never in jeopardy, so can be retried on the same charge. However, in some civil types of trials, the State can appeal the verdict.

So you're saying you WERE wrong, and it isn't up for an appeal of the verdict, right?

 

[Meister]

He was walking at the dinner hour - 7:00 pm - and there is no evidence he was not on the sidewalk or 'looking in windows'

In the summer months, that would be daylight, with guys on the 14th hole with plenty of time to finish.

But it was winter so that meant it was dark and it was raining. That's suspicious.

If walking at 7:00 pm in the rain is suspicious in America, god help you if you don't have a gun.

Gun manufacturers and NRA love that idea.

So it isn't about justice any longer, it's about politics.....glad we got to the the real beef you have. Start a thread on that and we can debate your real topic.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

In some juristictions, the State can appeal a verdict. I don't know about this type of verdict, but it is possible and has been done in certain trials before. Where there is jury misconduct, or if a juror lied about things when being questioned for jury duty, something should be able to be done. She is/was very obviously biased.

Sorry, but you're wrong. Once the verdict is in, the State can not appeal for any reason.

In the instances you cite, the State would bring charges against the juror(s) involved.

I looked it up. Because of double jeopardy, mostly if a person is tried and acquited, the State cannot appeal. The one exception seems to be if the person tried bribed the jury or judge. That then means he/she was never in jeopardy, so can be retried on the same charge. However, in some civil types of trials, the State can appeal the verdict.

Yeah, the ones where the State is the defendant, and they lose.

 

[asterism]

He was walking at the dinner hour - 7:00 pm - and there is no evidence he was not on the sidewalk or 'looking in windows'

In the summer months, that would be daylight, with guys on the 14th hole with plenty of time to finish.

But it was winter so that meant it was dark and it was raining. That's suspicious.

If walking at 7:00 pm in the rain is suspicious in America, god help you if you don't have a gun.

Gun manufacturers and NRA love that idea.

Go try it yourself. Wait until it's winter, dark, and raining and stroll around a gated community. Then try to sue anyone who questions you or calls the police on you.

 

[drivebymedia]

But it was winter so that meant it was dark and it was raining. That's suspicious.

If walking at 7:00 pm in the rain is suspicious in America, god help you if you don't have a gun.

Gun manufacturers and NRA love that idea.

So it isn't about justice any longer, it's about politics.....glad we got to the the real beef you have. Start a thread on that and we can debate your real topic.

Later - we want to keep a focus on these outrageously stupid right wing posts.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

This man is courageous and he speaks the absolute truth about blacks. You see, one of the biggest reasons why blacks are so far behind whites in America is because their insecurities regarding their own race inhibit them. That is why they hate themselves, why they treat their children like crap, why they kill each other and spread drugs inside of their own communities. It's a self destructive mindset.


Listen as Pastor Manning speaks the truth
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAFPIPiyoqA]Pastor Why Blacks Blame Zimmerman Why Trayvon Martin got skittles - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Meister]

If walking at 7:00 pm in the rain is suspicious in America, god help you if you don't have a gun.

Gun manufacturers and NRA love that idea.

So it isn't about justice any longer, it's about politics.....glad we got to the the real beef you have. Start a thread on that and we can debate your real topic.

Later - we want to keep a focus on these outrageously stupid right wing posts.

I guess this guy doesn't know his right from his left

 

[drivebymedia]

But it was winter so that meant it was dark and it was raining. That's suspicious.

If walking at 7:00 pm in the rain is suspicious in America, god help you if you don't have a gun.

Gun manufacturers and NRA love that idea.

Go try it yourself. Wait until it's winter, dark, and raining and stroll around a gated community. Then try to sue anyone who questions you or calls the police on you.

That's their right to call police.

Zimmerman decided to be arresting officer, judge, jury and executioner.

Now it's a world issue and he is in deep deep trouble.

 

[R.C. Christian]

It's obvious that Mr. Manning is a RACIST!

 

[R.C. Christian]

I have to say that Mr. Manning is correct and an honorable man.

 

[PredFan]

That thug wanna-be Martin bought skittles and Arizona Iced Tea in order to mix it with DXM and get high.