Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
So killing someone isn't probable cause... Seriously?Sure do, bunky....which is why Zimmerman should have been TESTED to see if he was under the influence of ANY drug.
Totally different?
How?
Police officers have no skill-set available to them to identify when some one may be under the influence of drugs or alcohol?
Without probable cause, wouldn't that be illegal search and seizure?
No, dipshit. Being questioned about a possible crime is not probable cause, no matter what the crime is (other than DUI), since anyone with more than a teaspoon of brains - not you, in other words - can see that that would mean drug-testing EVERY SUSPECT, which would sort of defeat the requirement of probable cause.
Seriously, could you BE a bigger cumstain?