WinterBorn
Diamond Member
- Moderator
- #261
The most embarrassing part of this is that frauds that try and pass themselves off as conservatives cheer this sort of government intrusion.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Intrusion? Seems to me the intrusion was when the government started trying to pick and choose economic winners in the first place.
While I do not agree with tax breaks for anyone, that still does not make it alright for the government to intrude in a squabble between private companies
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Again, if the constituents feel that the "private squabble" is an attack on them and demand it, do you really expect their elected representatives to refuse?
Please offer some evidence that this is the case.
And yes, I would like to think that doing the right thing mattered to elected officials. I do not believe that elected officials are there to jump at the daily whims of the voters.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Yes, well, politics can sometimes require balancing between what an officeholder thinks is right, and what their constituents think is right. This is probably not one of those cases, though. Do you really think it's likely that politicians from Georgia are big into gun-grabbing?
Furthermore, the NRA has a national membership of 5 million people. How many of them do you suppose are in a state like Georgia? And how pissed off do you think they are about Delta's decision, particularly considering that NRA members tend to be very passionate and energized on the subject of gun rights?
Again, the NRA's influence comes from its politically active membership. If you really think they're just sitting quietly and taking this boycott bullshit without a fight, you're delusional.
If the NRA members are pissed at Delta, then THEY should boycott Delta. The gov't should not use the tax system to punish Delta. If you cannot see how wrong that is, I have no way to make you see.