Cecilie1200
Diamond Member
- Nov 15, 2008
- 55,062
- 16,609
The convolution is that you are arguing that free speech constitutes a violation of free speech lol.That is some convoluted reasoning there, skippy.I don't know what version of the First Amendment YOU'RE reading, but the version I'm familiar with says, "Petition the government for redress of grievances". Doesn't specify what the grievances have to be to count. You get to pester your local politician for whatever you wanna pester him for.
I'm not talking about anyone petitioning government, I'm talking about the actions of the government. When a government representative says that a piece of legislation will not be passed unless company A does business in a particular way with organization X, that is not free speech. The representative is not acting as a private citizen in that context.
A member of government speaking on behalf of government being different than a private citizen speaking on their own behalf is "convoluted reasoning"?
Fucking leftist whackjobs.
What free speech. Delta said they don’t want to do business with the NRA, which is their right.
The State of Georgia is refusing to do business with Delta unless they do business with the NRA.
Imagine if the State of New York refused to give tax breaks to Chick-Fila-A unless they donate to GLAD and give discounts to their members
The state of Georgia is refusing to negotiate tax breaks with a company which discriminates. I should think you lefties would approve. Aren't you the ones always insisting that state and local governments MUST insist on all manner of parities in a business before allowing them to bid on government jobs? What is that, if not the government interfering in private business and telling them how to run their companies?
What if Delta had decided it wasn't going to give discounts to members of the NAACP? Would you want the state of Georgia to say, "Not our business. Let's talk about them tax breaks"? Of course not.