iceberg
Diamond Member
- May 15, 2017
- 36,788
- 14,920
and unless you cherry pick what he said to fit your judgement, this isn't what he is saying.a state can do whatever they want for the good of its citizens. not sure your point. Still.dude I give two shits. so I see you learned a new word this week. funny shit how obvious you are you have no idea how you're using it. When did I become a government?
You are not a government, you are a supporter of the government interfering with the private transactions between two private entities and you support that government trying to force one entity to pay a tribute to the other.
That is what makes you a statist.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
he's got you 100% pegged on the whole "new word" thing. you seem to lock onto a stereotype and can't wait to use it 100 times a day.
the biggest reason i hate stereotype thinking is because you get a group you hate and if you run into "trouble" getting to know someone, just put them in that group and you don't have to try and think about what they are saying.
but you flog the shit out of words like this and act as if it makes you superior for some reason.
I call things how I see them. Can you think of a more appropriate word for someone that fully supports the government interfering with transactions between two private entities and who supports the government trying to force one private entity to pay tributes to another private entity in the form of discounts?
I mean I guess Communist works, but statist seems to fit better
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Ok, so the state can take control of all private companies, for the good of its citizens, and you would support that.
The state could outlaw guns for the good of its citizens and you are good with that.
A state can force a baker to make a cake for the good of its citizens and you are good with that.
I misjudged you, communist is a better word.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com