- Thread starter
- #721
Watch the video simp.Gotcha.
The answer is he doesn’t say.
It is a fact that he has no firsthand knowledge of Pelosi denying national guard on January 6th.
The answer is he said he spoke with her 3 times
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watch the video simp.Gotcha.
The answer is he doesn’t say.
It is a fact that he has no firsthand knowledge of Pelosi denying national guard on January 6th.
But when and what about, we have no idea.Watch the video simp.
The answer is he said he spoke with her 3 times
Watch the video simpBut when and what about, we have no idea.
So how does this help your argument she held up the national guard?
I did. He never talked to Pelosi to request national guard. That’s a fact.Watch the video simp
You liarI did. He never talked to Pelosi to request national guard. That’s a fact.
Your argument is baseless.
Because I don’t have the opportunity to do so at this time.
Do you know or not?
Or are you afraid to answer some pretty simple but crucial questions?
Moron he claims to have spoken to her after 6pm, which was more than 2 hours AFTER National Guard was called in.Watch the video simp.
The answer is he said he spoke with her 3 times
Not at all. His testimony says so. He talked to Irving. Not Pelosi.You liar
You liar you said you were unable to watch the video at this time. And now you lying about what he saidNot at all. His testimony says so. He talked to Irving. Not Pelosi.
Fact is you have no testimony or evidence that Pelosi ever said no to national guard after the Trump rally devolved into a riot.
Sorry. That’s a fact.
Two of the three times was after. But he spoke with the Sergeant of arms before Jan 6 and was told by the Sergeant that he would have to run it up the chain meaning to Nancy PelosiMoron he claims to have spoken to her after 6pm, which was AFTER National Guard was called in.
This is exactly why I asked you to make your argument instead of presuming you actually UNDERSTAND what you link to.
You are just wasting everyone's time with your stupidity.
Okay. What did he say then, specifically.You liar you said you were unable to watch the video at this time. And now you lying about what he said
It was ZERO times. Watch your video again.Two of the three times was after. But he spoke with the Sergeant of arms before Jan 6 and was told by the Sergeant that he would have to run it up the chain meaning to Nancy Pelosi
You should watch the videoOkay. What did he say then, specifically.
He asked the sergeant of arms to request the national guard. The sergeant of arms said he would have to run it up the chain meaning to Nancy Pelosi.It was ZERO times. Watch your video again.
Again, there is zero evidence Pelosi objected, let alone blocked, National Guard deployment.
No dummy, the meaning is that he dfoes not know what Nancy had to say about it and Sergeant AT Arms was only one of three members.He asked the sergeant of arms to request the national guard. The sergeant of arms said he would have to run it up the chain meaning to Nancy Pelosi.
No dummy he knew exactly what Nancy wanted done when he talked with her after the sergeant of arms spoke with Nancy.No dummy, the meaning is that he had no idea what Nancy had to say about it and Sergeant AT Arms was only one of three members.
The conversation is about Pelosi supposedly blocking National Guard deployment.So what?