Gillibrand decides Pro-life people don't deserve to be able to advocate their viewpoint

martybegan

Diamond Member
Apr 5, 2010
82,438
33,842
When you decide the other side of a debate shouldn't be able to debate at all:

Gillibrand: Being Pro-Life Should Basically Be Unacceptable Like Racism, Anti-Semitism

As first reported by the Washington Free Beacon, Sen. Gillibrand told the Iowa newspaper, "Imagine saying that it's okay to appoint a judge who's racist or anti-Semitic or homophobic. Asking someone to appoint someone who takes away basic human rights of any group of people in America—I don't think that those are political issues anymore."

She then continued saying, "And we believe in this country in the separation of church and state, and I respect the rights of every American to hold their religious beliefs true to themselves, but our country and our Constitution has always demanded that we have a separation of church and state."

"And all these efforts by President Trump and other ultra-radical conservative judges and justices to impose their faith on Americans is contrary to our Constitution and that's what this is," she added. "And so I believe that for all of these issues, they are not issues that there is a fair other side. There is no moral equivalency when you come to racism, and I do not believe there is a moral equivalency when it comes to changing laws that deny women reproductive freedom."

Nice job equating a pro-life position with being a racist. And separation of Church and State doesn't mean religious people lose the ability to vote for what they want, or advocate for laws they want.
 

Forum List

Back
Top