giuliani & Ukraine Associate Spying On Yovanovitch

[Ray From Cleveland]

Lev Parnas is denigrated as unreliable because like so many Trump associates he is an accused criminal.
It might be wise to remember that the crime he is accused of is funneling Russian oligarch money to the REPUBLICAN PARTY. In fact some of that money was used to get Ambassador Yvonovich removed from Ukraine in order to facilitate the scheme Trump and Rudy was trying to pull off

Why would Trump need any money to get rid of her? A President can get rid of an ambassador for any reason at any time. He didn't need ten cents to get rid of her.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

 

[Lesh]

Lev Parnas is denigrated as unreliable because like so many Trump associates he is an accused criminal.
It might be wise to remember that the crime he is accused of is funneling Russian oligarch money to the REPUBLICAN PARTY. In fact some of that money was used to get Ambassador Yvonovich removed from Ukraine in order to facilitate the scheme Trump and Rudy was trying to pull off

Why would Trump need any money to get rid of her? A President can get rid of an ambassador for any reason at any time. He didn't need ten cents to get rid of her.

Sorry you are so uninformed. The money went to a Texas Congressman to push to have her removed

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Lev Parnas is denigrated as unreliable because like so many Trump associates he is an accused criminal.
It might be wise to remember that the crime he is accused of is funneling Russian oligarch money to the REPUBLICAN PARTY. In fact some of that money was used to get Ambassador Yvonovich removed from Ukraine in order to facilitate the scheme Trump and Rudy was trying to pull off

Why would Trump need any money to get rid of her? A President can get rid of an ambassador for any reason at any time. He didn't need ten cents to get rid of her.

Sorry you are so uninformed. The money went to a Texas Congressman to push to have her removed

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

 

[Lesh]

Lev Parnas is denigrated as unreliable because like so many Trump associates he is an accused criminal.
It might be wise to remember that the crime he is accused of is funneling Russian oligarch money to the REPUBLICAN PARTY. In fact some of that money was used to get Ambassador Yvonovich removed from Ukraine in order to facilitate the scheme Trump and Rudy was trying to pull off

Why would Trump need any money to get rid of her? A President can get rid of an ambassador for any reason at any time. He didn't need ten cents to get rid of her.

Sorry you are so uninformed. The money went to a Texas Congressman to push to have her removed

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Lev Parnas is denigrated as unreliable because like so many Trump associates he is an accused criminal.
It might be wise to remember that the crime he is accused of is funneling Russian oligarch money to the REPUBLICAN PARTY. In fact some of that money was used to get Ambassador Yvonovich removed from Ukraine in order to facilitate the scheme Trump and Rudy was trying to pull off

Why would Trump need any money to get rid of her? A President can get rid of an ambassador for any reason at any time. He didn't need ten cents to get rid of her.

Sorry you are so uninformed. The money went to a Texas Congressman to push to have her removed

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

 

[colfax_m]

Lev Parnas is denigrated as unreliable because like so many Trump associates he is an accused criminal.
It might be wise to remember that the crime he is accused of is funneling Russian oligarch money to the REPUBLICAN PARTY. In fact some of that money was used to get Ambassador Yvonovich removed from Ukraine in order to facilitate the scheme Trump and Rudy was trying to pull off

Why would Trump need any money to get rid of her? A President can get rid of an ambassador for any reason at any time. He didn't need ten cents to get rid of her.

Sorry you are so uninformed. The money went to a Texas Congressman to push to have her removed

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

Read the indictment. Parnas was using every angle he had, including Giuliani, which is why he’s under federal investigation.

This whole affair has so much smoke, it’s crazy. And it’s so close to Trump it’s hard to see how he doesn’t get burned by it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Why would Trump need any money to get rid of her? A President can get rid of an ambassador for any reason at any time. He didn't need ten cents to get rid of her.

Sorry you are so uninformed. The money went to a Texas Congressman to push to have her removed

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

Read the indictment. Parnas was using every angle he had, including Giuliani, which is why he’s under federal investigation.

This whole affair has so much smoke, it’s crazy. And it’s so close to Trump it’s hard to see how he doesn’t get burned by it.

It's not illegal for somebody like Parnas to ask for the removal of an ambassador.

 

[Faun]

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

 

[progressive hunter]

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

 

[Lesh]

Sorry you are so uninformed. The money went to a Texas Congressman to push to have her removed

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

Read the indictment. Parnas was using every angle he had, including Giuliani, which is why he’s under federal investigation.

This whole affair has so much smoke, it’s crazy. And it’s so close to Trump it’s hard to see how he doesn’t get burned by it.

It's not illegal for somebody like Parnas to ask for the removal of an ambassador.

What are you talking about? It IS illegal to funnel foreign money to political candidates but that’s not even the point. The point is WHY he was doing it. And he was doing it to remove the Ambassador because she stood in the way of Trump’s Ukraine scheme

 

[Lesh]

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

“It” was only released because Trump got CAUGHT

 

[progressive hunter]

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

“It” was only released because Trump got CAUGHT

caught doing what???exposing bidens corruption?

 

[Faun]

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

Then why is he saying he hopes to be called so he can release it?

 

[Faun]

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

“It” was only released because Trump got CAUGHT

caught doing what???exposing bidens corruption?

LOLOL

There was no Biden corruption.

 

[progressive hunter]

Timeline in Ukraine Probe Casts Doubt on Giuliani’s Biden Claim​

If the Senate does call a witness, it should be Rudy. He'd set things straight and you Democrats would have egg on your face.

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

Then why is he saying he hopes to be called so he can release it?

semantics,,,or it could be to get them out on the record,,

either way there is enough out there to confirm the bidens are corrupt,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

Rudy was on Laura's show last night, and he said not only would he testify, he would love to testify. His claim is he found so much evidence of corruption in Ukraine, especially where Burisma is concerned, and the DOJ refuses to investigate any of it.

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

“It” was only released because Trump got CAUGHT

caught doing what???exposing bidens corruption?

LOLOL

There was no Biden corruption.

thanks for your opinion,,, but I will stick with the facts,,

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Trump doesn't need the House or Senate to get rid of an ambassador. All he has to do is call her back and tell him or her they are no longer the ambassador of X, and put somebody else in their place by the President's choice.

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

Read the indictment. Parnas was using every angle he had, including Giuliani, which is why he’s under federal investigation.

This whole affair has so much smoke, it’s crazy. And it’s so close to Trump it’s hard to see how he doesn’t get burned by it.

It's not illegal for somebody like Parnas to ask for the removal of an ambassador.

What are you talking about? It IS illegal to funnel foreign money to political candidates but that’s not even the point. The point is WHY he was doing it. And he was doing it to remove the Ambassador because she stood in the way of Trump’s Ukraine scheme

He was funneling in illegal money, huh? So why not post a credible link to your claim? Nobody was talking about money except you. My point is that he didn't need money if he wanted her gone. All he had to do was get the message to Trump that she was a problem, and Trump would have looked into it and got rid of her without any kind of money.

 

[Lesh]

Trump had no idea who Yvanovich was or that she was involved in fighting the kind of corruption he was trying to engage in.

Parnas was funneling Russian money to that Texas Republican in an effort to LOBBY for her removal

keep up

Your unproven claim still makes no sense. If Parnas wanted her removed, he could have told Rudy to ask Trump for her removal, and it would have been done.

Read the indictment. Parnas was using every angle he had, including Giuliani, which is why he’s under federal investigation.

This whole affair has so much smoke, it’s crazy. And it’s so close to Trump it’s hard to see how he doesn’t get burned by it.

It's not illegal for somebody like Parnas to ask for the removal of an ambassador.

What are you talking about? It IS illegal to funnel foreign money to political candidates but that’s not even the point. The point is WHY he was doing it. And he was doing it to remove the Ambassador because she stood in the way of Trump’s Ukraine scheme

He was funneling in illegal money, huh? So why not post a credible link to your claim? Nobody was talking about money except you. My point is that he didn't need money if he wanted her gone. All he had to do was get the message to Trump that she was a problem, and Trump would have looked into it and got rid of her without any kind of money.

The fact remains that (among other things) he funneled illegal foreign money to a Texas Republican Congressman with the express purpose of lobbying that POS to get the Ambassador removed

 

[Faun]

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

Yet he won't release any of this supposed evidence.

he has released you dumbass,,,and you ignore it everytime,,,

“It” was only released because Trump got CAUGHT

caught doing what???exposing bidens corruption?

LOLOL

There was no Biden corruption.

thanks for your opinion,,, but I will stick with the facts,,

LOLOL

You have no facts. The facts are that Shokin wasn't pursuing Burisma for 2 years, that Burisma was only pursued after Shokin was sent packing and that neither Biden did anything corruptly.