Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All those "Science organizations" and not a single one that can show a lab experiment demonstrating the relationship between temperature and CO2.
weird
Whats weird is you ignoring science and giving more credibility to your ignorance and rumors. I mean, the science is real yet you favor the unreal, unproven stuff
There you go, lying again.
No, the science is NOT settled. No way. No how.
But that you're a lying scumbag? That IS settled science
Global Warming Hoax: News
Global Warming Hoax: 141 Scientists Sign Letter Sent to UN Secretary-General Questioning Global Warming
Global Warming Hoax: Video "The Cloud Mystery", The Case For Cosmic Rays
Global Warming Hoax: Video - Killing Children and Coworkers All in the Name of Climate Change
Warning, this video contains graphic images of children and adults blowing up with the sounds of shotgun blasts. There is blood splattered on other children and body parts blown off. The video is disturbing, youve been warned.
This mini-movie, No Pressure, was shot on 35mm with several big names involved. It was produced by the 1010global organization, their goal is to cut Carbon emissions by 10% in 2010. Obviously a lot money went in to making.
Global Warming Hoax: Antarctic Sea Ice for November 2009 Higher Than 1979
Contrary to media reports Antarctic sea ice continues to expand. Ice totals for November 2009 are significantly higher than 1979 when measurements began. The main stream media concentrates on a couple of small areas of the Antarctic in order to scare you in to believing that Antarctica is melting, when in fact its gaining ice.
Global Warming Losing Support In US, Climate Change Considered A Hoax
Whats weird is you ignoring science and giving more credibility to your ignorance and rumors. I mean, the science is real yet you favor the unreal, unproven stuff
No it's ok Frank received his degree in Climatology from Hannity-and-Beck University. He's what they call a self-proclaimed expert.
I'm just an expert at spotting tells and bullshit
Whats weird is you ignoring science and giving more credibility to your ignorance and rumors. I mean, the science is real yet you favor the unreal, unproven stuff
Mo son works at an iPSC Lab and he can explain his work to me. Maybe you can share some of your "real science" with me? So far, the AGW Science consists of pointing at the Weather Channel and going "ManMade Global Warming!"
Whats the relationship between CO2 and temperature? What's the temperature relationship starting at 0PPM CO2 and increasing in increments of 100
Yeah well its been around for decades and its been reviewed by others for accuracy. Your ignorance on the subject doesnt pass for proof of anything.
Just because someone doesnt understand how a red light means stop doesnt mean they wont get hit. You not understanding the relationship between CO2 and temp doesnt mean the science is wrong or fake. That just means you dont understand.
Mo son works at an iPSC Lab and he can explain his work to me. Maybe you can share some of your "real science" with me? So far, the AGW Science consists of pointing at the Weather Channel and going "ManMade Global Warming!"
Whats the relationship between CO2 and temperature? What's the temperature relationship starting at 0PPM CO2 and increasing in increments of 100
Yeah well its been around for decades and its been reviewed by others for accuracy. Your ignorance on the subject doesnt pass for proof of anything.
Just because someone doesnt understand how a red light means stop doesnt mean they wont get hit. You not understanding the relationship between CO2 and temp doesnt mean the science is wrong or fake. That just means you dont understand.
I missed the part where you show me the lab experiments and the relationship between CO2 and temperature.
Care to try again?
Mo son works at an iPSC Lab and he can explain his work to me. Maybe you can share some of your "real science" with me? So far, the AGW Science consists of pointing at the Weather Channel and going "ManMade Global Warming!"
Whats the relationship between CO2 and temperature? What's the temperature relationship starting at 0PPM CO2 and increasing in increments of 100
Yeah well its been around for decades and its been reviewed by others for accuracy. Your ignorance on the subject doesnt pass for proof of anything.
Just because someone doesnt understand how a red light means stop doesnt mean they wont get hit. You not understanding the relationship between CO2 and temp doesnt mean the science is wrong or fake. That just means you dont understand.
What's to understand? AGW is just the latest round for the flat-Earthers.
Ame®icano;8993068 said:Listen up all you haters!!
It's not called Global Warming anymore........the correct term now is Climate Change.
Carry on.........
Its only been that way for a 3 decades.
It's been that way since they're busted for lying and since data doesn't support their story.
By the way, there is nothing that will stop liberal from their transference.
Check this out... can't make this shit up.
https://skepticalscience.com/global-warming-since-1997-more-than-twice-as-fast.html
Both of their new surface temperature data sets show significantly more warming over the past 16 years than HadCRUT4. This is mainly due to HadCRUT4 missing accelerated Arctic warming, especially since 1997.
Cowtan & Way investigate the claim of a global surface warming 'pause' over the past 16 years by examining the trends from 1997 through 2012. While HadCRUT4 only estimates the surface warming trend at 0.046°C per decade during that time, and NASA puts it at 0.080°C per decade, the new kriging and hybrid data sets estimate the trend during this time at 0.11 and 0.12°C per decade, respectively.
These results indicate that the slowed warming of average global surface temperature is not as significant as previously believed. Surface warming has slowed somewhat, in large part due to more overall global warming being transferred to the oceans over the past decade. However, these sorts of temporary surface warming slowdowns (and speed-ups) occur on a regular basis due to short-term natural influences.
Skeptical Science
This site was created by John Cook. I'm not a climatologist or a scientist but a self employed cartoonist and web programmer by trade. I did a Physics degree at the University of Queensland and while I achieved First Class Honours and could've continued onto a PhD, I instead quit academia and became a professional scrawler. Too much doodling in lectures, I think. Nevertheless, I've pursued a keen interest in science and if anything, found my curiosity about how the world works increased once I wasn't forced to study for impending exams.
My interest in global warming began when I drew a cartoon spoof of the TV show 24 that wondered what Jack Bauer would do if Al Gore was President and global warming was the "threat du jour". I watched An Inconvenient Truth for research which I found thought provoking although I didn't know what to make of all the science.
Mo son works at an iPSC Lab and he can explain his work to me. Maybe you can share some of your "real science" with me? So far, the AGW Science consists of pointing at the Weather Channel and going "ManMade Global Warming!"
Whats the relationship between CO2 and temperature? What's the temperature relationship starting at 0PPM CO2 and increasing in increments of 100
Yeah well its been around for decades and its been reviewed by others for accuracy. Your ignorance on the subject doesnt pass for proof of anything.
Just because someone doesnt understand how a red light means stop doesnt mean they wont get hit. You not understanding the relationship between CO2 and temp doesnt mean the science is wrong or fake. That just means you dont understand.
I have a problem with most globalwarmingistas in that they tend to "exaggerate".. for example Oldrocks said ""i.e. many millions of scientists" agree GW is real.
Yet I've not found MILLIONS of scientists much less "millions" agreeing about GW.
I did find this:
0,257 Climate surveys sent to "NOT MILLIONS"... but 10,257 of WHICH
3,146 returned their surveys of which
77 were climate scientists of which
42 said "yes"
View attachment 29980
About that overwhelming 97-98% number of scientists that say there is a climate consensus? | Watts Up With That?
Mo son works at an iPSC Lab and he can explain his work to me. Maybe you can share some of your "real science" with me? So far, the AGW Science consists of pointing at the Weather Channel and going "ManMade Global Warming!"
Whats the relationship between CO2 and temperature? What's the temperature relationship starting at 0PPM CO2 and increasing in increments of 100
Yeah well its been around for decades and its been reviewed by others for accuracy. Your ignorance on the subject doesnt pass for proof of anything.
Just because someone doesnt understand how a red light means stop doesnt mean they wont get hit. You not understanding the relationship between CO2 and temp doesnt mean the science is wrong or fake. That just means you dont understand.
I missed the part where you show me the lab experiments and the relationship between CO2 and temperature.
Care to try again?
Yeah well its been around for decades and its been reviewed by others for accuracy. Your ignorance on the subject doesnt pass for proof of anything.
Just because someone doesnt understand how a red light means stop doesnt mean they wont get hit. You not understanding the relationship between CO2 and temp doesnt mean the science is wrong or fake. That just means you dont understand.
What's to understand? AGW is just the latest round for the flat-Earthers.
Flat Earthers were the ones denying the science of the day. But then I'm not an alarmist, rather a realist. I don't think mankind is not going to be able to change it's fossil fuel consumption, so we're better plan on mitigating the effects of the changing climate rather trying to stop it.
Once again, every single Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University state in policy statements that AGW is a fact, and a clear and present danger.
So, what you are positing is that there is a massive conspiracy among many millions of scientists from every nation and political system in the world to create the image of a threat that does not exist. Do you even begin to realize how absolutely insane that sounds?
Even if rising CO2 isn't the direct cause of rising average global temperatures, is that any reason to keep clearcutting rainforests, dumping plastic garbage into the oceans, and burning toxic sludge for transportation?
Hey the word is warm and its cold that means the research and science is wrong - Says the idiot
Yeah well its been around for decades and its been reviewed by others for accuracy. Your ignorance on the subject doesnt pass for proof of anything.
Just because someone doesnt understand how a red light means stop doesnt mean they wont get hit. You not understanding the relationship between CO2 and temp doesnt mean the science is wrong or fake. That just means you dont understand.
I missed the part where you show me the lab experiments and the relationship between CO2 and temperature.
Care to try again?
No, I'm not a scientist but I'll let the scientist tell you
Google It For Me!
There you go. Now you dont even have to google it either.
Even if rising CO2 isn't the direct cause of rising average global temperatures, is that any reason to keep clearcutting rainforests, dumping plastic garbage into the oceans, and burning toxic sludge for transportation?
WTF was that?
Even if rising CO2 isn't the direct cause of rising average global temperatures, is that any reason to keep clearcutting rainforests, dumping plastic garbage into the oceans, and burning toxic sludge for transportation?
WTF was that?
That means he ran out of gas and has moved to another bullshit narrative like conservatives hate women, want dirty water & air, etc.
I missed the part where you show me the lab experiments and the relationship between CO2 and temperature.
Care to try again?
No, I'm not a scientist but I'll let the scientist tell you
Google It For Me!
There you go. Now you dont even have to google it either.
Number 1 answer
"Science & Mathematics > Weather
Next
What is the relationship between Carbon dioxide and temperature?
Best Answer
Arun dilipan Anbazhagan answered 3 years ago
this is very simple, the relationship between them is that when there is more carbon di oxide then the temperature gets raised this is because carbon di oxide traps the heat from the sun too efficiently than other gases .
Source:
Rate Comment"
Uh huh. That was awesome
Even if rising CO2 isn't the direct cause of rising average global temperatures, is that any reason to keep clearcutting rainforests, dumping plastic garbage into the oceans, and burning toxic sludge for transportation?
WTF was that?
That means he ran out of gas and has moved to another bullshit narrative like conservatives hate women, want dirty water & air, etc.
All also true.
