CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,709
- 69,859
- 2,330
I see. So what you are stating is that heat causes GHGs. The fact that the absorption spectra of GHGs has nothing at all to do with warming the atmosphere.
Now Code, only the whole of the scientific information in physics and chemistry says that is totally wrong.
The causation of the present warming is the fact that we have added 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere, and 150% more CH4, along with many industrial GHGs that are tens of thousands of times as effective of a GHG as CO2. Every single Scientific Society dealing with Physics and Chemistry states that this is a fact.
Physics Society Quietly Reaffirms Climate Change Policy Stance Fresh Air. The Scent of Pine.
In April of this year, the APS posted an addendum to its official policy stance on climate change. The addendum strongly reaffirmed the Societys existing policy and support of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) theory.
The posting was the last chapter in a fabricated controversy that started out with blustering, gale-force winds blowing throughout the endless corridors of the Internet and ended with hardly a whisper. That the APS was revisiting its policy received massive amounts of attention from the blogosphere as well as major media outlets in 2009. However, the actual result, borne from a year-long process that included the solicitation, review, and incorporation of comments from the Societys 46,034 members, was barely noticed.
Originally issued in November 2007, the APS official policy statement on Climate Change concluded that emissions of greenhouse gases from human activities are changing the atmosphere in ways that affect the Earths climate and that if no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earths physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur.
So what confused the Vostok Ice cores? Why do they show heat first, then CO2 increase?
Also, "The causation of the present warming is the fact that we have added 40% more CO2 to the atmosphere, and 150% more CH4, along with many industrial GHGs that are tens of thousands of times as effective of a GHG as CO2. Every single Scientific Society dealing with Physics and Chemistry states that this is a fact."
So is should be a piece of cake for you to show us how this happens in a laboratory setting, right?
I'll give you a 200PPM increase in CO2 and a 4000 additional PPB CH4 (that's billion, I know you Warmers like to put your thumb on the scale when you do these experiments and go up to 400,000PPM when you show CO2 increasing temperatures)