No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.
"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"
It is my money and I want to keep it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.
"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"
No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.
"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"
No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.
"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"
No, God and Jesus believe in private initiative in helping the poor and sick. They did not believe in Person A forcing Person B to do so at the point of a gun.
"give unto Ceaser that which is Ceasers"
It was Christ's way of saying don' tmix politics with religion.
The overall view of the OT is you abide the law of the land, so long as the law of the land doesn't require you to act in opposition to the Word.
lilolady said:When you give to your church, especially the Catholic church, that is socialism because that money is distributed to the poor.
Yes, that which is Caesar's. Not that which Caesar claims is his.
Some one who obviously has no concept of taxation and caesar, if caesar said it was his then it was his.
Someone who obviously has no concept of property rights. If Caesar lays claim to something that is by right mine, and takes it by force, that doesn't make it his.
Jesus only got bent out of shape while running the money changers from the temple.
Boy was that a mistake, he was crucified shortly thereafter for that escapade.
Jesus only got bent out of shape while running the money changers from the temple.
Boy was that a mistake, he was crucified shortly thereafter for that escapade.
Perfect example to what happens to lefties when they mess with my tax dollars!!
Do not believe me? Well, the lefts current messiah is about to get his 'political' nine inch nails due to his "holier than thou' social policies and tax schemes!! And Notice how he has not implemented ay of them as of yet. Just the threat of them has the population in a tizzy!!!
GOD AND JESUS BELIEVE IN SOCIALISM
Gods low to the Israelites was distribution of the wealth. Gleaning was one way that socialism was practiced. God took from other nations and gave to the Israelites and then he took for the Israelites and gave to the nations. He took the Kingdom of Heaven from them and gave it to the nations.
Jesus approved of taxes, healing the sick and feeding the poor which were socialistic practices.
Right Wing Regilioius Nuts and Village Idiots call this stealing and robbery The government do ask from you more than what you can afford and what is fair.
Giving to charities is not the same as the government distributions because they distribute according to rules, regulations and guide lines. Money given to charitable organizations it is almost never given to the poor.
GOD was the ultimate socialist when he gave his son as a ransom for our sins.
When you give to your church, especially the Catholic church, that is socialism because that money is distributed to the poor.
Is God a Socialist?
Oct 10, 2008
Is God a Socialist? - Vox
Jesus was a socialist. The religions founded on him are not.
☭proletarian☭;1828908 said:And the Republicans were founded as a liberal party and remained that way until after the Reconstruction, when the southern Klansmen migrated from the Democrats to the Republican party. Now the part is the partyof rich reactionaries who want to institute an oligarchy, were as the Democrats is the party of rich make-it-up-as-we-go-alongs who want to institute an oligarchy,Can you actually explain how this is true before you just say it. Most civil rights laws were passed by republican legislatures before 1964.
The Republican Party was never liberal in any sense of the word. The Democratic Party was the old classical liberal party, but that ended with the end of Cleveland's administration and the rise of progressivism.
Some one who obviously has no concept of taxation and caesar, if caesar said it was his then it was his.
Someone who obviously has no concept of property rights. If Caesar lays claim to something that is by right mine, and takes it by force, that doesn't make it his.
Caesar was emperopr of ancient Rome. In the time of Jesus, Caesar could order the execution of an entire region. Now do you understand where Jesus is coming from?
Or are you one of those people that consider Jesus words timeless and transcends historical references??
I also like the system of pay in Japan. CEO's can only make 1,000 times what their lowest paid employee makes.
☭proletarian☭;1829740 said:☭proletarian☭;1828908 said:And the Republicans were founded as a liberal party and remained that way until after the Reconstruction, when the southern Klansmen migrated from the Democrats to the Republican party. Now the part is the partyof rich reactionaries who want to institute an oligarchy, were as the Democrats is the party of rich make-it-up-as-we-go-alongs who want to institute an oligarchy,
The Republican Party was never liberal in any sense of the word. The Democratic Party was the old classical liberal party, but that ended with the end of Cleveland's administration and the rise of progressivism.
Wrong, dude. The Republican party was founded on the principles of classical liberalism, which is why they opposed slavery and stressed individualism and individual rights. Even to this day, nearly all of their rhetoric still centers around classical liberal ideals of personal freedom.
The Nazis were not Rightwing but Totalitarian Left
The Nazis were not Rightwing but Totalitarian Left
Incorrect. They were definitely right-wing.