GOP Debate Thread 9/16...Here we go!

[bedowin62]

well I watch the whole thing from the beginning to the end ... I did miss the part where all the repub-lie-clowns got out of the VW bug

YAWN

are your own clown candidates still in the Witness Protection program leftard???

actually the only one who are incarceration are republican goveners, repub-lie-tard

wtf????

PLEASE go get your GED before addressing me again ok???

poor little repub-lie-tard Bedwetter can't grasp the reality of things

didnt i say go get your GED boy?

get snappin!!!

 

[bedowin62]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

 

[Faun]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

 

[bedowin62]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

calm down sissy; your own liberal-run world is a much more violent place IN REALITY. you know reality dummy???

 

[Faun]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

calm down sissy; your own liberal-run world is a much more violent place IN REALITY. you know reality dummy???

I am calm. You're just too insane to know that. But it's amusing watching bedwetter project himself upon others.

 

[bedowin62]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

calm down sissy; your own liberal-run world is a much more violent place IN REALITY. you know reality dummy???

I am calm. You're just too insane to know that. But it's amusing watching bedwetter project himself upon others.

sure loon; you just oooze calmness and civility!! lol

 

[Faun]

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

calm down sissy; your own liberal-run world is a much more violent place IN REALITY. you know reality dummy???

I am calm. You're just too insane to know that. But it's amusing watching bedwetter project himself upon others.

sure loon; you just oooze calmness and civility!! lol

There ya go, projecting again. Nothing says civility like calling someone an asshole, right?

 

[bedowin62]

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

calm down sissy; your own liberal-run world is a much more violent place IN REALITY. you know reality dummy???

I am calm. You're just too insane to know that. But it's amusing watching bedwetter project himself upon others.

sure loon; you just oooze calmness and civility!! lol

There ya go, projecting again. Nothing says civility like calling someone an asshole, right?

i'm not claiming to be civil dummy. i openly despise loony left-wingers and i make no apologies or excuses for that

 

[Preacher]

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

It did not throw anything into chaos. It clarified that no state can deny a couple a marriage license merely because the applicants are of the same gender. No state, including Kentucky, can issue licenses to straight couples but not to gay couples. Who knows why that is too complicated for you to comprehend?

And no county clerk can defy the Supreme Court ruling. Kim Davis found that out the hard way. It matters not if you agree with the ruling or not.

She wasn't issuing licenses to ANYONE straight or mentally deranged couples. She was breaking no "law" because there is no "law" to violate. When Kentucky legislature decides what the law will be which more than likely will include protections of religious rights just like North Carolina and Alabama has done then licenses can be issued once again with everyone knowing the law.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

The law she was following was deemed unconstitutional. Observing that law despite its unconstitutionality was in clear violation of the rights of those to whom she refused to issue a marriage license.

But she knows this now as she changed her tune while in jail and has now acquiesced to allow her office to issue marriage licenses to gays; something she refused to allow before going to jail.

Those licenses are void since they edited an official government document illegally. She is STILL the elected official and has complete control over that area of government in Rowan county,Ky. Not her deputy not a thug in a robe.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

Replaced by??? lol

The judge said, rightfully so, stick it up your ass and follow the US CONSTITUTION, AND BY NOT TAKING IT UP, SCOTUS AGREED!

Judge is a thug in a robe who himself said he doesn't think the edited licenses are legit. So. Oh and marriage is NOT talked about ANYWHERE in the constitution so we can chop another one up to the sick left claiming it says what they want it to say and getting 5 retards to voice their opinion in favor of it like it truly matters.

Cruz knows his shit

Cruz is a fucking whack job who would have the world in flames in 90 days or less.

Huckabee still doesn't know the role of the Supreme Court

Oh the SC MAKES law now? Please share this knowledge with us.

Vaccines saved billions of lives over the past 90 years. Stupid anti-science fuckers.

They also kill people. Look up the US vaccine court.

What law did the Supreme Court make?

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Huckabee is clueless on the role of the Supreme Court and the supremacy clause

No, Kentucky voters do not get precidence over a Supreme Court ruling

Kentucky legislature makes the laws because marriage of all kinds are a states rights issue not a federal issue. SC ruled with their OPINION that the law was wrong therefore there is no law now and we must wait until their is a law. Which is why in a smart nation we will have 1 party with 1 set of rules and no assholes in robes dictating if they think its right or not.

 

[Faun]

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

calm down sissy; your own liberal-run world is a much more violent place IN REALITY. you know reality dummy???

I am calm. You're just too insane to know that. But it's amusing watching bedwetter project himself upon others.

sure loon; you just oooze calmness and civility!! lol

There ya go, projecting again. Nothing says civility like calling someone an asshole, right?

i'm not claiming to be civil dummy. i openly despise loony left-wingers and i make no apologies or excuses for that

That's what I said ... you're projecting yourself upon others. Thanks for admitting it.

 

[bodecea]

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

calm down sissy; your own liberal-run world is a much more violent place IN REALITY. you know reality dummy???

I am calm. You're just too insane to know that. But it's amusing watching bedwetter project himself upon others.

sure loon; you just oooze calmness and civility!! lol

There ya go, projecting again. Nothing says civility like calling someone an asshole, right?

i'm not claiming to be civil dummy. i openly despise loony left-wingers and i make no apologies or excuses for that

Good then....wouldn't want to be too much of a liar, would you?

 

[Papageorgio]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

Drama Queen, you poor victim.

 

[Faun]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

Drama Queen, you poor victim.

Victim of what?

 

[Papageorgio]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

Drama Queen, you poor victim.

Victim of what?

Oh brother! pretend much?

 

[Faun]

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

It did not throw anything into chaos. It clarified that no state can deny a couple a marriage license merely because the applicants are of the same gender. No state, including Kentucky, can issue licenses to straight couples but not to gay couples. Who knows why that is too complicated for you to comprehend?

And no county clerk can defy the Supreme Court ruling. Kim Davis found that out the hard way. It matters not if you agree with the ruling or not.

She wasn't issuing licenses to ANYONE straight or mentally deranged couples. She was breaking no "law" because there is no "law" to violate. When Kentucky legislature decides what the law will be which more than likely will include protections of religious rights just like North Carolina and Alabama has done then licenses can be issued once again with everyone knowing the law.

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

The law she was following was deemed unconstitutional. Observing that law despite its unconstitutionality was in clear violation of the rights of those to whom she refused to issue a marriage license.

But she knows this now as she changed her tune while in jail and has now acquiesced to allow her office to issue marriage licenses to gays; something she refused to allow before going to jail.

Those licenses are void since they edited an official government document illegally. She is STILL the elected official and has complete control over that area of government in Rowan county,Ky. Not her deputy not a thug in a robe.

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

Replaced by??? lol

The judge said, rightfully so, stick it up your ass and follow the US CONSTITUTION, AND BY NOT TAKING IT UP, SCOTUS AGREED!

Judge is a thug in a robe who himself said he doesn't think the edited licenses are legit. So. Oh and marriage is NOT talked about ANYWHERE in the constitution so we can chop another one up to the sick left claiming it says what they want it to say and getting 5 retards to voice their opinion in favor of it like it truly matters.

Cruz knows his shit

Cruz is a fucking whack job who would have the world in flames in 90 days or less.

Huckabee still doesn't know the role of the Supreme Court

Oh the SC MAKES law now? Please share this knowledge with us.

Vaccines saved billions of lives over the past 90 years. Stupid anti-science fuckers.

They also kill people. Look up the US vaccine court.

What law did the Supreme Court make?

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Huckabee is clueless on the role of the Supreme Court and the supremacy clause

No, Kentucky voters do not get precidence over a Supreme Court ruling

Kentucky legislature makes the laws because marriage of all kinds are a states rights issue not a federal issue. SC ruled with their OPINION that the law was wrong therefore there is no law now and we must wait until their is a law. Which is why in a smart nation we will have 1 party with 1 set of rules and no assholes in robes dictating if they think its right or not.

The state of Kentucky did not abolish marriage. A county clerk does not get to unilaterally establish such an edict. That's why she went to jail; and rightfully so. As far as the licenses not being valid ... if they are not, they will be validated at some point in the future. As far as the word, "marriage," not being in the Constitution -- the words, "nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws," are. Denying gays equal protection of laws governing marriage violates the Constitution.

 

[Faun]

And who here is wishing for the death of conservatives over those Supreme Court rulings?

um i dont recall accusing anybody of wishing death on people; but right-wingers have received death threats from unhinged left-wing nutjobs on a daily basis

"because anywhere else in the world at any other time in human history, the Ideological Left would have been erased in the US. Had you people got the SCOTUS to issue such a 'ruling' in my GrandDad's day, Washington DC would already be a smolderin' hulk with Leftists heads scattered up on pikes ALL OVER THE EAST COAST." ~ another insane rightard

Drama Queen, you poor victim.

Victim of what?

Oh brother! pretend much?

If you knew, you would have said.

 

[Toro]

Cruz and Rubio have annoying speaking voices.

 

[browsing deer]

Cruz and Rubio have annoying speaking voices.

Gd yes. I like his policies, but he always bugged me. I think you have put you finger on it. He sounds like a mosquito. But I can get over that.

 

[AceRothstein]

LOL at Jeb saying his brother kept America safe.

 

[AceRothstein]

Cruz and Rubio have annoying speaking voices.

Cruz has a face for radio and a voice for print.