GOP Debate Thread 9/16...Here we go!

[Synthaholic]

Ann Coulter, during tonight's debate:

ROFLMAO...what the fuck is she talking about?

Read for yourself:

Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) | Twitter

 

[RKMBrown]

Rand did back down a bit later on.. even backed up Trump a couple times. Ok Rand made up for last debate.

 

[RKMBrown]

I thought Christie won the debate.

 

[jon_berzerk]

It's time for the small group of debaters. Pataki, Santorum, Graham and Lyndal.

Discuss...

missed it

 

[jon_berzerk]

i thought they all failed when it came to the shutting down the government over pp

 

[Faun]

Cruz knows his shit

Cruz is a fucking whack job who would have the world in flames in 90 days or less.

Huckabee still doesn't know the role of the Supreme Court

Oh the SC MAKES law now? Please share this knowledge with us.

Vaccines saved billions of lives over the past 90 years. Stupid anti-science fuckers.

They also kill people. Look up the US vaccine court.

What law did the Supreme Court make?

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

 

[Preacher]

Cruz is a fucking whack job who would have the world in flames in 90 days or less.
Oh the SC MAKES law now? Please share this knowledge with us.
They also kill people. Look up the US vaccine court.

What law did the Supreme Court make?

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

 

[sosplease]

What law did the Supreme Court make?

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

 

[Preacher]

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

 

[sosplease]

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

That's all well and good but you not caring doesn't mean it doesn't matter.

 

[Faun]

What law did the Supreme Court make?

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

It did not throw anything into chaos. It clarified that no state can deny a couple a marriage license merely because the applicants are of the same gender. No state, including Kentucky, can issue licenses to straight couples but not to gay couples. Who knows why that is too complicated for you to comprehend?

And no county clerk can defy the Supreme Court ruling. Kim Davis found that out the hard way. It matters not if you agree with the ruling or not.

 

[Faun]

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

The law she was following was deemed unconstitutional. Observing that law despite its unconstitutionality was in clear violation of the rights of those to whom she refused to issue a marriage license.

But she knows this now as she changed her tune while in jail and has now acquiesced to allow her office to issue marriage licenses to gays; something she refused to allow before going to jail.

 

[Dad2three]

Marriage laws were broken. Denying an individual a marriage license because they choose to marry someone who is the same gender is unconstitutional.

The judicial branch decides constitutionality of laws, not county clerks.

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

Replaced by??? lol

The judge said, rightfully so, stick it up your ass and follow the US CONSTITUTION, AND BY NOT TAKING IT UP, SCOTUS AGREED!

 

[MarcATL]

Cruz has been outstanding .......

Yea, out standing in the Twilight Zone.

More like hitting it out of the park.......notice how they all rushed to agree with him on defunding planned parenthood

Except the heavily edited videos were turned into outright lies. No one sold fetuses. It's against the law. Local authorities would have arrested anyone doing such an odious thing. Come on people. Don't be so fucking gullible. It makes you look like morons.

I don't know how Republicans can manage to look more moronic than they already do.

Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk

 

[bedowin62]

Cruz has been outstanding .......

Yea, out standing in the Twilight Zone.

More like hitting it out of the park.......notice how they all rushed to agree with him on defunding planned parenthood

Except the heavily edited videos were turned into outright lies. No one sold fetuses. It's against the law. Local authorities would have arrested anyone doing such an odious thing. Come on people. Don't be so fucking gullible. It makes you look like morons.

I don't know how Republicans can manage to look more moronic than they already do.

Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk

i know how; they could become Democrats

 

[bedowin62]

Still not following. If the LAW was unconstitutional that means there is NO LAW now. Got it now? The Kentucky legislature doesn't meet until January. They will then pass a new law with more than likely opt outs for people with religious objections to this kind of "marriage"

No, I'm following ... Davis refused to observe the Supreme Court ruling despite that law being deemed unconstitutional. Even worse, she wouldn't let anyone in her office issue marriage licenses to gays. It doesn't matter what the Kentucky legislature does in January, Davis is violating the law now. Kentucky didn't stop issuing marriage licenses until January. They still issue marriage licenses. Denying gay couples of those same licenses they're giving to straight couples is unconstitutional.

The ruling merely said the law was unconstitutional that's all. It threw EVERYTHING into chaos and she is right to ignore that thug in the robes illegal orders to marry ANYONE. There is NO LAW to violate until January when Kentucky passes a new law and only then can she violate ANY law.

What branch of government does a county clerk belong to? Judicial or Executive?

Don't care. Why does it matter? The SC can NOT make a new law therefore the law she was going by is gone and is replaced by NOTHING until January when the legislature meets.

Replaced by??? lol

The judge said, rightfully so, stick it up your ass and follow the US CONSTITUTION, AND BY NOT TAKING IT UP, SCOTUS AGREED!

hilarious when Gruberites act all confident and shit!! lol

 

[bedowin62]

tell me how much you care about the Constitution leftardz!!!



Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th ...
www.nationalreview.com/.../supreme-court-rules-unani...

• Cached
• Similar

National Review
Loading...
Jun 26, 2014 - Supreme Court Rules Unanimously Against Obama for 12th and 13th ... the administration loses significant cases in unanimous decisions and

 

[rightwinger]

Cruz knows his shit

Cruz is a fucking whack job who would have the world in flames in 90 days or less.

Huckabee still doesn't know the role of the Supreme Court

Oh the SC MAKES law now? Please share this knowledge with us.

Vaccines saved billions of lives over the past 90 years. Stupid anti-science fuckers.

They also kill people. Look up the US vaccine court.

What law did the Supreme Court make?

Rightwinger is saying that the SC made a law that Kim Davis is breaking....they did not. They RULED on a law and declared is unconstitutional the next step is for the STATE OF KENTUCKY LEGISLATURE to pass a new law.Therefore right now there is NO LAW not being followed because there is no law.

Huckabee is clueless on the role of the Supreme Court and the supremacy clause

No, Kentucky voters do not get precidence over a Supreme Court ruling

 

[MarcATL]

This is way better than the Faux News debate so far.

That much is true. Much more substantial and issue-driven.

Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

The audience is nothing but white people.

Did you expect otherwise?

Actually, I saw two black women in the front the entire time.

Sent from my SM-N910T3 using Tapatalk