TheProgressivePatriot
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #121
I am done with your stupid ass. Anyone following this knows what is going on here with your stupid juvenile games. my work is done here.nothing to figure out,, its in simple english in about 6 words,,Cut the crap. You are a major pain in the ass. I am not going to waist my time trying to figure out what you're taling about when you are to lazy and inarticulate to actually formulate a cogent and concise paragraph or two, with documentation , explaing exactly what you are saying. Get the hell out of here.my statement is in simple english and very short,, for the life of me I dont know why you cant read it,,,Stop it! Just fucking stop it with your cryptic crap. Explain what you're talking about or get out of my face.the difference is why I said he could,,, why are you ignoring that part???You said that he could call for a new election. What is the fucking difference. You are stil playing yuour childish and dishonest word games. Stop it!I never said he could just void it did I,,,That does not mean that he can void an election based on the delusion that he was cheated.you just think that because of your progressive indoctrination,,,You're still trying to gaslight me by trying to make me doubt what I know to be fact. And, you are still making assertions about the constitution that you can't document. You are a real pathetic mess Bud. Get the hell out of here .everytime you quoted me you edited wat I said,,, you have yet to address my full quote,,,I did not edit your comments. I reposted them and shoved them in your face to show what a liar you are. You think that you can gaslight me by posting shit and then denying that you said it. Not working Bud. I am smarter than that. I am smarter, and more honest than you.. You know what you said. Own it.next time dont edit my comment to fit your narrative,,I did. You're full of shit as alwaysthats not what I said,, go back and read it again,,What the hell am I twisting? I presented facts and that is all. Stop playing childish games. You stated that the Constitution gives the president power to hold a new election, WITHOUT presenting any documentation of your clim, like you always do.only because you reject the constitution and what it says,,That is a piss poor answer but exactly what I would expect of youin the constitution and supported by his oath of office,,And that is written where exactly?if he can prove foreign intervention in the election he has a responsibility to call for it and a new election,,,This is complete insanity! What has happened to our country? People like this call themselves patriots, while at the same time engaging in dagerous rhetoric the threatens the very foundation of our republic. It is dangerous and irresponsible and suborns the idea that resorting to force is ok when you don't like the outcome of an election. They are not patriots. They are traitors and terrorists
GOP gubernatorial candidate in Virginia calls on Trump to declare martial law (msn.com)
The U.S. has never declared martial law, which gives the military broad powers in a time of crisis, at the federal level. But it has been used in some instances at state and local levels during disasters or times of unrest, such as in Hawaii following the attack on Pearl Harbor.
It's a legal grey area and any effort by Trump to use the military to overturn the election results would be immediately thwarted by Congress or the Supreme Court.
Trump's legal challenges to the election have been broadly dismissed by the courts, including the Supreme Court. The president and his campaign have not been able to prove the wild accusations they've made on social media and cable news.
Really??
The Constitution provides no mechanism for a re-vote of the Presidential election. However, it does provide three mechanisms by which a rigged election can be over-ridden.
The Electoral College can collectively ignore the election outcome. Electors are nominally pledged to vote for a given candidate, but if enough of them act as faithless electors, it can change the outcome of the election.
[*]Congress can reject the electoral votes from states with voting issues. Doing so requires a majority vote in both houses of Congress; this happened in the 1872 election, when the votes from Arkansas and Louisiana were rejected due to voting irregularities.
[*]Congress can reject the election entirely by not recognizing any of the electoral votes, sending the election to the House of Representatives and Senate as provided in the Twelfth Amendment. It's unclear what "the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three" would mean in the context of an election where zero electoral votes were cast, so it's likely that, in practice, sufficient electoral votes would be accepted to generate a tie.
[*]
your twisting what I said to fit your narrative,,, very dishonest of you but expected,,
YOU SAID: if he can prove foreign intervention in the election he has a responsibility to call for it and a new election,,,
You Said: in the constitution and supported by his oath of office,,I SAID; And that is written where exactly?You said: only because you reject the constitution and what it says,,I said: That is a piss poor answer but exactly what I would expect of you
my statement stands,,, and is backed up by the constitution and his oath of office,,
dont get mad at me for what the constitution says,, maybe you should read it instead of putting your progressive spin on it,,,
my statement stands,,
POTUS has a duty to protect and defend the constitution from all enemies foreign or domestic,, and the constitution gives him the power to do that,,
again respond to my full comment instead of your edited version,,,
are you just stupid or what???
First of all, the Chinees apparently don't care that much
China Isn’t Nervous About the U.S. Election – Foreign Policy
They may have favored Biden, while the Russians favored Trump. There is no indication that their interfearance altered the out come, and this is damnd sure to reason for martial law, voiding the election, and disenfranchising millions of Americana. You do recall that marshal law is the topic, don't you? It appears that you love Trump more than Deocracy itself.