GOP loss: NFL drafts openly gay player, who kisses his partner on ESPN; Public is ok

[The Rabbi]

Rabbi's post below is an early indicator of the future of mainstream conservatism; they will eventually pretend they never had a problem with gay rights in the first place.

Conservatism always loses in long run, because conservatism is anti-progress, and progress is evolution, and evolution is unstoppable.

There is nothing here about gay rights, dipshit. The GOP never took a position on any of it. Therefore they could not "lose" anything.
Pro football won't gain much by featuring perverts on its teams. Who wants to watch crap like that?

True, the GOP never took any kind of official position on it, but a GOP lobbyist tried to get a bill sponsored that would ban gay players from the NFL.

The NFL isn't "featuring perverts", they're featuring football players...some of whom happen to be gay.

Link?
A guy kissing his gay lover under the auspices of the NFL is a pervert.

 

[zeke]

There is nothing here about gay rights, dipshit. The GOP never took a position on any of it. Therefore they could not "lose" anything.
Pro football won't gain much by featuring perverts on its teams. Who wants to watch crap like that?

I know what you mean. That Michael Vick was a big disappointment.

I don't think Vick was having sex with his dogs. He was no model citizen any way you look at it though.

I don't think Sam will be having sex with his team mates either. But you never can tell in this crazy world.

 

[Stephanie]

There is nothing here about gay rights, dipshit. The GOP never took a position on any of it. Therefore they could not "lose" anything.
Pro football won't gain much by featuring perverts on its teams. Who wants to watch crap like that?

True, the GOP never took any kind of official position on it, but a GOP lobbyist tried to get a bill sponsored that would ban gay players from the NFL.

The NFL isn't "featuring perverts", they're featuring football players...some of whom happen to be gay.

Link?
A guy kissing his gay lover under the auspices of the NFL is a pervert.

good luck...that sounds like total BS

 

[PredFan]

The GOP lost yet another small battle today.

The National Football League....the beacon of macho manliness in America, had it's collegiate player draft today.

And former University of Missouri defensive end Michael Sam, SEC defensive player of the year, was drafted in the 7th round by the St Louis Rams. He is considered a "tweener", too slow to play LB, too small for DE, but very talented, so he's getting his shot.

ESPN showed him at his home with his partner, a white man. So, basically, a gay interracial couple, kissing on national TV on ESPN, after Sam was drafted into the manliest of sports, the NFL.

And what happened? Nothing. The public is fine with it. His future St Louis teammates welcomed him and basically said lets get to work and win some ball games. ESPN analysts spoke of the significance of the moment...and them spoke of how Sam will fit in with the Ram's scheme and their incredibly talented defense.

The public is just fine with it. So are his teammates.

Only the GOP seems to have a problem with gay people. And society will remember it.

Who was fighting against it again?

Yeah nobody. Troll.

 

[Stephanie]

Don't you love these so high and mighty libs..who really believes no libs disagrees with homosexuality and it's only, THE GOP and people in it

isn't that a real frikken hoot

 

[NoNukes]

Rabbi's post below is an early indicator of the future of mainstream conservatism; they will eventually pretend they never had a problem with gay rights in the first place.

Conservatism always loses in long run, because conservatism is anti-progress, and progress is evolution, and evolution is unstoppable.

There is nothing here about gay rights, dipshit. The GOP never took a position on any of it. Therefore they could not "lose" anything.
Pro football won't gain much by featuring perverts on its teams. Who wants to watch crap like that?

You just proved the point that you were attempting to dispute.

 

[The Rabbi]

Rabbi's post below is an early indicator of the future of mainstream conservatism; they will eventually pretend they never had a problem with gay rights in the first place.

Conservatism always loses in long run, because conservatism is anti-progress, and progress is evolution, and evolution is unstoppable.

There is nothing here about gay rights, dipshit. The GOP never took a position on any of it. Therefore they could not "lose" anything.
Pro football won't gain much by featuring perverts on its teams. Who wants to watch crap like that?

You just proved the point that you were attempting to dispute.

No, actually that didnt happen. But you would need an IQ at least in double digits to understand that.

 

[Redfish]

Who cares? Why is always the libs that start threads about gays and lesbians? Why are liberals so obsessed with gay sex?

Why is this news? Why did the guy have to "come out", why not just keep his sexual habits to himself?

Here's your answer folks----------------the current gay agenda is not about equality, fairness, or rights. Its about mandated societal validation of an abnormal lifestyle. Its about thought control--Orwell saw it coming.

 

[deltex1]

I am hearing Da Rams will move da SAMs to center...a position he is familiar with on and off the field.


Let's play football...forget the gay shit.....please.

 

[NoNukes]

There is nothing here about gay rights, dipshit. The GOP never took a position on any of it. Therefore they could not "lose" anything.
Pro football won't gain much by featuring perverts on its teams. Who wants to watch crap like that?

You just proved the point that you were attempting to dispute.

No, actually that didnt happen. But you would need an IQ at least in double digits to understand that.

Yes it did, how does your reading conprehension keep getting worse? There are remedial courses for this.

 

[NoNukes]

Who cares? Why is always the libs that start threads about gays and lesbians? Why are liberals so obsessed with gay sex?

Why is this news? Why did the guy have to "come out", why not just keep his sexual habits to himself?

Here's your answer folks----------------the current gay agenda is not about equality, fairness, or rights. Its about mandated societal validation of an abnormal lifestyle. Its about thought control--Orwell saw it coming.

You must be kidding. Have you never read Nova Steve?

 

[Redfish]

Who cares? Why is always the libs that start threads about gays and lesbians? Why are liberals so obsessed with gay sex?

Why is this news? Why did the guy have to "come out", why not just keep his sexual habits to himself?

Here's your answer folks----------------the current gay agenda is not about equality, fairness, or rights. Its about mandated societal validation of an abnormal lifestyle. Its about thought control--Orwell saw it coming.

You must be kidding. Have you never read Nova Steve?

have you read 1984? how about Atlas Shrugged? Orwell and Rand predicted the lunacy we are seeing today.

 

[NoNukes]

Who cares? Why is always the libs that start threads about gays and lesbians? Why are liberals so obsessed with gay sex?

Why is this news? Why did the guy have to "come out", why not just keep his sexual habits to himself?

Here's your answer folks----------------the current gay agenda is not about equality, fairness, or rights. Its about mandated societal validation of an abnormal lifestyle. Its about thought control--Orwell saw it coming.

You must be kidding. Have you never read Nova Steve?

have you read 1984? how about Atlas Shrugged? Orwell and Rand predicted the lunacy we are seeing today.

I have read all of these, but you are changing the subject.

 

[zeke]

Atlas Shrugged was about a gay football player? No way. 1984 was about gay rights? Are you sure?

 

[Redfish]

Atlas Shrugged was about a gay football player? No way. 1984 was about gay rights? Are you sure?

liberalism and thought control. your ignorance is no excuse for your arrogance.

 

[Redfish]

You must be kidding. Have you never read Nova Steve?

have you read 1984? how about Atlas Shrugged? Orwell and Rand predicted the lunacy we are seeing today.

I have read all of these, but you are changing the subject.

you brought up reading, not me

 

[Sunni Man]

Pres. Obama talked about Michael Sam's "courage" for coming out as gay football player.

I remember when the word "courage" was reserved for Medal of Honor recipients or Firemen who rescued people from burning buildings.

Basically a word used for people who performed heroic acts.

But today, a guy admitting to getting his fudge packed is seen as the epitome "courage".

Kinda pathetic when you think about it. ..

 

[Katzndogz]

A mind reader who can read the minds of the entirety of the public at the same time.

Very talented.

 

[Wildman]

The GOP lost yet another small battle today.

The National Football League....the beacon of macho manliness in America, had it's collegiate player draft today.

And former University of Missouri defensive end Michael Sam, SEC defensive player of the year, was drafted in the 7th round by the St Louis Rams. He is considered a "tweener", too slow to play LB, too small for DE, but very talented, so he's getting his shot.

ESPN showed him at his home with his partner, a white man. So, basically, a gay interracial couple, kissing on national TV on ESPN, after Sam was drafted into the manliest of sports, the NFL.

And what happened? Nothing. The public is fine with it. His future St Louis teammates welcomed him and basically said lets get to work and win some ball games. ESPN analysts spoke of the significance of the moment...and them spoke of how Sam will fit in with the Ram's scheme and their incredibly talented defense.

The public is just fine with it. So are his teammates.

Only the GOP seems to have a problem with gay people. And society will remember it.

where does the GOP fit in here ? you fucking libertards always speak in terms of generalities, can you prove the GOP in general has a problem ?

sooooo, from what you say here, i surmise you are saying all the Jackass party demos are qweers ? love qweers ? sleep with qweers ? i am beginning to believe from what you liberqweers say..., you all ............
........
"The public"......?? just exactly in your words, whom is the "public" ??

in reality...., why don't you people just fade away, the world would be a whole lot better if the gays, demorats, muslimes and all other similar minded folks had their own planet to live on.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Rabbi's post below is an early indicator of the future of mainstream conservatism; they will eventually pretend they never had a problem with gay rights in the first place.

Conservatism always loses in long run, because conservatism is anti-progress, and progress is evolution, and evolution is unstoppable.

That's why you have top re brand socialism as "Progressive" cause it's so awesome and unstoppable