Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You trying to get an honest reply from PC?Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
When was that?
Actually, when PC first came on the board, she engaged in legitimate discussions. Then she settled into her "watch me piss off liberals" role. It has grown tiresome as she is now just a one trick pony
That's what happens when a RWnut ventures outside of the echo chamber and discovers that there's a refutation for every crazy belief the RWnuts hold.
She has chosen her cut and paste persona because she has become intellectually lazy. It is easier to play Internet games than actually engage in honest discussion
Honest debate is based on ideas.
That is exactly what I provide.
As the quote and links that I provide requires far more study than you have done....exposes which of us is lazy.
Good.
Then prove that the GOP can implement a workable plan that will increase defense spending, cut taxes, balance the budget, and pay off the national debt in a generation.
You prove it. With specifics.
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Is she really any different than Stephanie?Actually, when PC first came on the board, she engaged in legitimate discussions. Then she settled into her "watch me piss off liberals" role. It has grown tiresome as she is now just a one trick pony
That's what happens when a RWnut ventures outside of the echo chamber and discovers that there's a refutation for every crazy belief the RWnuts hold.
She has chosen her cut and paste persona because she has become intellectually lazy. It is easier to play Internet games than actually engage in honest discussion
Honest debate is based on ideas.
That is exactly what I provide.
As the quote and links that I provide requires far more study than you have done....exposes which of us is lazy.
Good.
Then prove that the GOP can implement a workable plan that will increase defense spending, cut taxes, balance the budget, and pay off the national debt in a generation.
You prove it. With specifics.
Can anyone help PC here? She isn't capable of defending the rubbish she posts.
You trying to get an honest reply from PC?Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Expect a cut and paste barrage about the horrors of FDR
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Is she really any different than Stephanie?That's what happens when a RWnut ventures outside of the echo chamber and discovers that there's a refutation for every crazy belief the RWnuts hold.
She has chosen her cut and paste persona because she has become intellectually lazy. It is easier to play Internet games than actually engage in honest discussion
Honest debate is based on ideas.
That is exactly what I provide.
As the quote and links that I provide requires far more study than you have done....exposes which of us is lazy.
Good.
Then prove that the GOP can implement a workable plan that will increase defense spending, cut taxes, balance the budget, and pay off the national debt in a generation.
You prove it. With specifics.
Can anyone help PC here? She isn't capable of defending the rubbish she posts.
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
How did we get to a $17 trillion debt again?
Oh....right...by voting for a Democrat.
Gee.....are all Democrats debt-inducing?
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.” 'http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/magazine/17obama-t.html
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Let's call US Imports $2,000 Billion/year.
To make $680 billion/year, we need a 34% tariff on imports.
Next?
Is she really any different than Stephanie?That's what happens when a RWnut ventures outside of the echo chamber and discovers that there's a refutation for every crazy belief the RWnuts hold.
She has chosen her cut and paste persona because she has become intellectually lazy. It is easier to play Internet games than actually engage in honest discussion
Honest debate is based on ideas.
That is exactly what I provide.
As the quote and links that I provide requires far more study than you have done....exposes which of us is lazy.
Good.
Then prove that the GOP can implement a workable plan that will increase defense spending, cut taxes, balance the budget, and pay off the national debt in a generation.
You prove it. With specifics.
Can anyone help PC here? She isn't capable of defending the rubbish she posts.
rightwinger US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Some good...some bad
rightwinger US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Some good...some bad
rightwinger US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Some good...some bad
No shit....every American believes that"
- "Constitution: Our Constitution should be preserved, valued and honored.
A fabrication right off the bat.
Liberals don't believe in the Constitution.
They endorse the absurd notion that any Liberal in a black robe can alter it as they see fit....i.e., 'the living Constitution,' which could be called 'the amendments be damned' thesis.
- As a basis for understanding the Commerce Clause, Professor Barnett examined over 1500 times the word ‘commerce’ appeared in the Philadelphia Gazette between 1715 and 1800. In none of these was the term used to apply more broadly than the meaning identified by Justice Thomas in his concurring opinion in ‘Lopez,’ in which he maintained that the word ‘commerce’ refers to the trade and exchange of goods, and that process, including transportation of same. A common trilogy was ‘agriculture, manufacturing and commerce.’
- For an originalist, direct evidence of the actual use of a word is the most important source of the word’s meaning. It is more important than referring to the ‘broader context,’ or the ‘larger context,’ or the ‘underlying principles,’ which is the means by which some jurists are able to turn ‘black’ into ‘white’, and ‘up’ into ‘down.’.” “Originalism,” Steven Calabresi,
So..."every Americans believe that " is patently false.
Only real American do.
Golly gee....how can you argue with Rush Limbaugh conservatism?
Liberals don't believe in the Constitution....even though they wrote it
Capitalists who focused on freedom of opportunity and religion wrote the Constitution. Nothing Liberal here. The Framers of the Constitution wrote nothing about citizens subsisting off the Government from Cradle To Grave. Hardly Liberal.
All men are created equal......at the time, there was no more liberal thought in the world
Conservatives supported the king....that's where the money was
Why hide behind a stolen appellation?
By now you know very well that the communist/socialist John Dewey glommed on to "Liberal" because of how the electorate caught on to 'socialism.'
In "The World Turned Upside Down," makes clear the difference between the Founders, the classical liberal, today's conservatives, .....
....and you, the Modern Liberal, the socialist, the Marxist....
Study it:
"Classical liberalism, the optimistic doctrine that gave us liberty, democracy, progress, was a moral project. It held that human society could always better itself by encouraging the good and diminishing the bad. It rested, therefore, on a very clear understanding that there was a higher cause than self-realization: that there were such things as right and wrong and that the former should be preferred over the latter.
But the belief that autonomous individuals had the right to make subjective judgment about what was right for them in pursuit of their unchallengeable entitlement to happiness destroyed that understanding. Progressives interpreted liberty as license, thus destroying the moral rules that make freedom a virtue."
Melanie Phillips
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Let's call US Imports $2,000 Billion/year.
To make $680 billion/year, we need a 34% tariff on imports.
Next?
Is that sarcasm?
A tariff increase would be a tax increase. That takes that off the table in any promised Republican plan, because they are promising to cut taxes even more, not raise them.
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Let's call US Imports $2,000 Billion/year.
To make $680 billion/year, we need a 34% tariff on imports.
Next?
Is that sarcasm?
A tariff increase would be a tax increase. That takes that off the table in any promised Republican plan, because they are promising to cut taxes even more, not raise them.
No a tariff is not an individual tax.
The Republican plan says nothing about tariffs.
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Let's call US Imports $2,000 Billion/year.
To make $680 billion/year, we need a 34% tariff on imports.
Next?
Is that sarcasm?
A tariff increase would be a tax increase. That takes that off the table in any promised Republican plan, because they are promising to cut taxes even more, not raise them.
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Let's call US Imports $2,000 Billion/year.
To make $680 billion/year, we need a 34% tariff on imports.
Next?
Is that sarcasm?
A tariff increase would be a tax increase. That takes that off the table in any promised Republican plan, because they are promising to cut taxes even more, not raise them.
I actually agree with you!
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
How did we get to a $17 trillion debt again?
Oh....right...by voting for a Democrat.
Gee.....are all Democrats debt-inducing?
'But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.” 'http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/magazine/17obama-t.html
The lowest annual deficits average for any president in the last 33 years would be Clinton.
You didn't address the issue.
How will the GOP
1. increase defense spending
2. lower taxes
3. balance the budget, and,
4. pay off the debt in 25 years (that's a generation)
as they are claiming they will do in your original post?
If you can't post a feasible path to those promises, you have to admit that your GOP 'principles' are little more than empty unachievable fantasies.
So, try again.
In fact, I'm willing to make my question easier. Forget about the 17 trillion in debt.
How does the GOP plan to balance the budget, period, within the framework of increasing defense spending, and not raising taxes?
Try that one, PC (or anyone). That should be easy for you.
lol
Here's some help to get you started. To pay off a 17 trillion dollar debt in 25 years, which is considered the length of a generation,
you would have to generate a surplus of 680 billion per year. That's without counting the annual interest on the existing and remaining debt.
Go!
Let's call US Imports $2,000 Billion/year.
To make $680 billion/year, we need a 34% tariff on imports.
Next?
Is that sarcasm?
A tariff increase would be a tax increase. That takes that off the table in any promised Republican plan, because they are promising to cut taxes even more, not raise them.
A. There is nothing in the OP about How Republicans would balance the budget
B. YOU are saying it would be done with increased taxes. You did not say What Kind of Taxes
A tariff is not an individual tax.
The Republican plan says nothing about tariffs.
