kaz
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 78,025
- 22,327
You're overthinking it.I said "arguably" balancing the budget, and Blues was arguing.Brown is addressing that along with his budget, but that's just not an issue that get's resolved over night.Riiiight and the California $300+ billion dollar public pension shortfall? Balanced budget my ass.
The idea that you can resolve that over night is a key element of the GOP's economic scaremongering
How does that contradict the point?
What Blues did was simply restate the dilemma, not say why Brown's proposals are bad.
I gather he didn't even know that Brown is negotiating with Unions and Democrats to address the pensions and their affect on his budget.
You probably didn't either.
Arguably meaning he didn't but you could argue it anyway?
If Brown got his budget as proposed, the budget would be balanced, and people are arguing with him
So he arguably managed to balance the budget because he proposed one that you think would balance the budget so you're giving him credit for doing it. The problem isn't me "over" thinking that, it's you under thinking in general. California is hemorrhaging corporations and people with money because tax rates are ridiculous. Your view that more taxes won't lead to less of the people who pay most of them is delusional