GOP runs Kansas into ground, another red welfare state.

Riiiight and the California $300+ billion dollar public pension shortfall? Balanced budget my ass.
Brown is addressing that along with his budget, but that's just not an issue that get's resolved over night.

The idea that you can resolve that over night is a key element of the GOP's economic scaremongering

How does that contradict the point?
I said "arguably" balancing the budget, and Blues was arguing.

What Blues did was simply restate the dilemma, not say why Brown's proposals are bad.

I gather he didn't even know that Brown is negotiating with Unions and Democrats to address the pensions and their affect on his budget.

You probably didn't either.

Arguably meaning he didn't but you could argue it anyway?
You're overthinking it.

If Brown got his budget as proposed, the budget would be balanced, and people are arguing with him

So he arguably managed to balance the budget because he proposed one that you think would balance the budget so you're giving him credit for doing it. The problem isn't me "over" thinking that, it's you under thinking in general. California is hemorrhaging corporations and people with money because tax rates are ridiculous. Your view that more taxes won't lead to less of the people who pay most of them is delusional
 
Best thing for Kansas to do is cut more taxes

Wealth and prosperity will surely follow
Yep.

Those struggling CEO's need their corporate deductions, as millions of dollars a year in salaries and bonuses is barely enough to send the poodle for a wash.

If the kids can't eat, they should get a job, as all state revenue 'belongs to those who make it'TM.*

*Even though most tax revenue is from the poor and middle class, and corporations receive tax credits and subsidies that often exceed the tax they pay.
Not only that....Look at all the corporations flocking to Kansas for their low tax rate
 
*Even though most tax revenue is from the poor and middle class, and corporations receive tax credits and subsidies that often exceed the tax they pay.

How does that work since 1% of taxpayers pay 40% of taxes, 5% pay 60% and 50% pay 100%?

Not very good at math, are you?
Incorrect. What is 100-48.9? 51.1.
In 2013, according to our analysis of preliminary IRS data, people with adjusted gross incomes above $250,000 paid nearly half (48.9%) of all individual income taxes, though they accounted for only 2.4% of all returns filed. Their average tax rate (total taxes paid divided by cumulative AGI) was 25.6%. By contrast, people whose incomes were less than $50,000 accounted for 63.4% of all individual income tax returns filed in 2013, but they paid just 6.2% of total taxes; their average tax rate was 4.2%.
High-income Americans pay most income taxes but enough to be fair Pew Research Center
Though, if you include all those that earn below 1 million a year (which I am referring to), then you are well above that 51.1%.
 
Republicans need to stop thinking it's still the 1950's.

The Republicans do? :lol: You might want to clue in the AFL-CIO on that along with every other far left turd who points to the 1950s as justification for why we should have 80% income tax rates.
 
Kansas may furlough 7,000 state workers as tax-starved coffers run dry

Red states, just say thanks to us blue staters who float you through the hard times.

You're welcome.

More than 7,000 state employees in Kansas would be furloughed on Monday if state lawmakers cannot agree on a new annual budget by midnight on Saturday, state officials said on Friday.

The Kansas House and Senate are trying to make up an estimated $400 million revenue shortfall in the wake of tax cuts engineered by Republican Governor Sam Brownback in recent years.


Republicans can't do math.

They should be more like IL and CA, right?
There are a couple of ways to handle things like this, and since you brought up California, and state budgets.

Jerry Brown, having grown cantankerous and salty compared to his days as "moon beam"...has arguably managed to "balance" California's budget. The resulting new expenses for medi-cal/Medicaid expansion in California has the potential to derail that balance.

What does the more seasoned version of Brown intend to do?...he is holding back increases for provider reimbursement to Medi-Cal doctors, which was supposed to result in more Medi-Cal doctors, a big problem. In the name of "balance", for the poor, he wants to have the average tax credit be $460 a year with a maximum credit of $2,653 for families with three or more children, to complement the federal tax credit program. It would be available to individuals with incomes of less than $6,580, or up to $13,870 for families with three or more dependents.

So Jerry Brown is doing what a true fiscal conservative like Eisenhower or Goldwater would have done. He is taking government programs away from poor people, but putting more money in their pockets, so that the poor have to do the math with their own budgets, as opposed to the Government giving them a card of some type, and putting them in line for some bureaucractic process complete with uncaring state workers, forms, and inefficiency.

This is all happening now, and you'd think the Republicans would LOVE this....but wait...they can't, because Jerry Brown is a (D).

Brown has pissed off many Democrats in the state, for every Republican who is sitting back unable to approve of what he's doing.

You need to realize your side, is not interested in making things right, they're interested in promoting the Republican cause, which is getting back into power.

People like Jerry Brown are few, and he's earned my respect for how he transformed downtown Oakland as Mayor, and what he's doing as Governor.

Brown is doing fiscally conservative things out here, but they're not like what Kansas, and most Republican red states want to do.

Kansas Republicans think starving the poor, and feeding the rich, will reduce poverty.

Think of how fundamentally wrong that sentence sounds.

Well, you're totally wrong so the sentence is immaterial
How is it wrong?

Are Kansas politicians not practicing austerity to motivate the poor out of subsistence?

Well you're lying about staring the poor so that makes it wrong
 
In 2000, the Gore campaign sent letters to every county on how to use technicalities to toss military write in ballots

I smell bullshit

Savage, Levin, Limbaugh or Hannity?
It's all the same BS

Brietbart, Savage, Drudge, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, or Hannity

People shouldn't be allowed to listen to people you disagree with
I'm amazed by the difference between what I write, and think, and how your head processes it sometimes.

I listen to those guys, so what made you believe I don't want it allowed?

Answer: One or all of those guys told you it's what I want, and that residual misleading and false impression was rattling around in your psyche, ready to be thrown out in haste

Yes, only liberals think, everyone else is told what to think by talk radio. And somehow the liberals who think all think the same thing and conservatives are telling me to be libertarian. Why are they doing that again? Pure rhetorical genius on your part, LOL
Oh the myriad misleading and false impressions.

You are good for something Kaz.

They're not telling you what to think.

Right wing media hold focus groups to find out what their target demographic audience wants to hear.

In this case, that's you.

Then they all say that.

You stay tuned in listening to their advertisers, and voting for Republicans.

And you get the validation you seek.
 
Then why are most red states welfare states?

Where do the bulk of minorities live?

In any case, not sure why you're complaining about this seeing as how you vote for it.
 
Kansas may furlough 7,000 state workers as tax-starved coffers run dry

Red states, just say thanks to us blue staters who float you through the hard times.

You're welcome.




Republicans can't do math.

They should be more like IL and CA, right?
There are a couple of ways to handle things like this, and since you brought up California, and state budgets.

Jerry Brown, having grown cantankerous and salty compared to his days as "moon beam"...has arguably managed to "balance" California's budget. The resulting new expenses for medi-cal/Medicaid expansion in California has the potential to derail that balance.

What does the more seasoned version of Brown intend to do?...he is holding back increases for provider reimbursement to Medi-Cal doctors, which was supposed to result in more Medi-Cal doctors, a big problem. In the name of "balance", for the poor, he wants to have the average tax credit be $460 a year with a maximum credit of $2,653 for families with three or more children, to complement the federal tax credit program. It would be available to individuals with incomes of less than $6,580, or up to $13,870 for families with three or more dependents.

So Jerry Brown is doing what a true fiscal conservative like Eisenhower or Goldwater would have done. He is taking government programs away from poor people, but putting more money in their pockets, so that the poor have to do the math with their own budgets, as opposed to the Government giving them a card of some type, and putting them in line for some bureaucractic process complete with uncaring state workers, forms, and inefficiency.

This is all happening now, and you'd think the Republicans would LOVE this....but wait...they can't, because Jerry Brown is a (D).

Brown has pissed off many Democrats in the state, for every Republican who is sitting back unable to approve of what he's doing.

You need to realize your side, is not interested in making things right, they're interested in promoting the Republican cause, which is getting back into power.

People like Jerry Brown are few, and he's earned my respect for how he transformed downtown Oakland as Mayor, and what he's doing as Governor.

Brown is doing fiscally conservative things out here, but they're not like what Kansas, and most Republican red states want to do.

Kansas Republicans think starving the poor, and feeding the rich, will reduce poverty.

Think of how fundamentally wrong that sentence sounds.

Well, you're totally wrong so the sentence is immaterial
How is it wrong?

Are Kansas politicians not practicing austerity to motivate the poor out of subsistence?

Well you're lying about staring the poor so that makes it wrong
dys·phe·mism
ˈdisfəˌmizəm/
noun
noun: dysphemism; plural noun: dysphemisms
  1. a derogatory or unpleasant term used instead of a pleasant or neutral one, such as “loony bin” for “mental hospital.”
 
Best thing for Kansas to do is cut more taxes

Wealth and prosperity will surely follow
Yep.

Those struggling CEO's need their corporate deductions, as millions of dollars a year in salaries and bonuses is barely enough to send the poodle for a wash.

If the kids can't eat, they should get a job, as all state revenue 'belongs to those who make it'TM.*

*Even though most tax revenue is from the poor and middle class, and corporations receive tax credits and subsidies that often exceed the tax they pay.
Not only that....Look at all the corporations flocking to Kansas for their low tax rate
So when do we get to meet the Wizard of Oz? Which Corporation will rule them all?
 
They should be more like IL and CA, right?
There are a couple of ways to handle things like this, and since you brought up California, and state budgets.

Jerry Brown, having grown cantankerous and salty compared to his days as "moon beam"...has arguably managed to "balance" California's budget. The resulting new expenses for medi-cal/Medicaid expansion in California has the potential to derail that balance.

What does the more seasoned version of Brown intend to do?...he is holding back increases for provider reimbursement to Medi-Cal doctors, which was supposed to result in more Medi-Cal doctors, a big problem. In the name of "balance", for the poor, he wants to have the average tax credit be $460 a year with a maximum credit of $2,653 for families with three or more children, to complement the federal tax credit program. It would be available to individuals with incomes of less than $6,580, or up to $13,870 for families with three or more dependents.

So Jerry Brown is doing what a true fiscal conservative like Eisenhower or Goldwater would have done. He is taking government programs away from poor people, but putting more money in their pockets, so that the poor have to do the math with their own budgets, as opposed to the Government giving them a card of some type, and putting them in line for some bureaucractic process complete with uncaring state workers, forms, and inefficiency.

This is all happening now, and you'd think the Republicans would LOVE this....but wait...they can't, because Jerry Brown is a (D).

Brown has pissed off many Democrats in the state, for every Republican who is sitting back unable to approve of what he's doing.

You need to realize your side, is not interested in making things right, they're interested in promoting the Republican cause, which is getting back into power.

People like Jerry Brown are few, and he's earned my respect for how he transformed downtown Oakland as Mayor, and what he's doing as Governor.

Brown is doing fiscally conservative things out here, but they're not like what Kansas, and most Republican red states want to do.

Kansas Republicans think starving the poor, and feeding the rich, will reduce poverty.

Think of how fundamentally wrong that sentence sounds.

Well, you're totally wrong so the sentence is immaterial
How is it wrong?

Are Kansas politicians not practicing austerity to motivate the poor out of subsistence?

Well you're lying about staring the poor so that makes it wrong
dys·phe·mism
ˈdisfəˌmizəm/
noun
noun: dysphemism; plural noun: dysphemisms
  1. a derogatory or unpleasant term used instead of a pleasant or neutral one, such as “loony bin” for “mental hospital.”

Well, you're lying. No nice way of saying it.
 
There are a couple of ways to handle things like this, and since you brought up California, and state budgets.

Jerry Brown, having grown cantankerous and salty compared to his days as "moon beam"...has arguably managed to "balance" California's budget. The resulting new expenses for medi-cal/Medicaid expansion in California has the potential to derail that balance.

What does the more seasoned version of Brown intend to do?...he is holding back increases for provider reimbursement to Medi-Cal doctors, which was supposed to result in more Medi-Cal doctors, a big problem. In the name of "balance", for the poor, he wants to have the average tax credit be $460 a year with a maximum credit of $2,653 for families with three or more children, to complement the federal tax credit program. It would be available to individuals with incomes of less than $6,580, or up to $13,870 for families with three or more dependents.

So Jerry Brown is doing what a true fiscal conservative like Eisenhower or Goldwater would have done. He is taking government programs away from poor people, but putting more money in their pockets, so that the poor have to do the math with their own budgets, as opposed to the Government giving them a card of some type, and putting them in line for some bureaucractic process complete with uncaring state workers, forms, and inefficiency.

This is all happening now, and you'd think the Republicans would LOVE this....but wait...they can't, because Jerry Brown is a (D).

Brown has pissed off many Democrats in the state, for every Republican who is sitting back unable to approve of what he's doing.

You need to realize your side, is not interested in making things right, they're interested in promoting the Republican cause, which is getting back into power.

People like Jerry Brown are few, and he's earned my respect for how he transformed downtown Oakland as Mayor, and what he's doing as Governor.

Brown is doing fiscally conservative things out here, but they're not like what Kansas, and most Republican red states want to do.

Kansas Republicans think starving the poor, and feeding the rich, will reduce poverty.

Think of how fundamentally wrong that sentence sounds.

Well, you're totally wrong so the sentence is immaterial
How is it wrong?

Are Kansas politicians not practicing austerity to motivate the poor out of subsistence?

Well you're lying about staring the poor so that makes it wrong
dys·phe·mism
ˈdisfəˌmizəm/
noun
noun: dysphemism; plural noun: dysphemisms
  1. a derogatory or unpleasant term used instead of a pleasant or neutral one, such as “loony bin” for “mental hospital.”

Well, you're lying. No nice way of saying it.
Always simple you are Frank.

So yeah, have it your way.
 
Well, you're totally wrong so the sentence is immaterial
How is it wrong?

Are Kansas politicians not practicing austerity to motivate the poor out of subsistence?

Well you're lying about staring the poor so that makes it wrong
dys·phe·mism
ˈdisfəˌmizəm/
noun
noun: dysphemism; plural noun: dysphemisms
  1. a derogatory or unpleasant term used instead of a pleasant or neutral one, such as “loony bin” for “mental hospital.”

Well, you're lying. No nice way of saying it.
Always simple you are Frank.

So yeah, have it your way.

I'll make you a deal: stop lying and I'll stop calling you out on it.

Deal?
 
Kansas may furlough 7,000 state workers as tax-starved coffers run dry

Red states, just say thanks to us blue staters who float you through the hard times.

You're welcome.

More than 7,000 state employees in Kansas would be furloughed on Monday if state lawmakers cannot agree on a new annual budget by midnight on Saturday, state officials said on Friday.

The Kansas House and Senate are trying to make up an estimated $400 million revenue shortfall in the wake of tax cuts engineered by Republican Governor Sam Brownback in recent years.


Republicans can't do math.

You call this bad news?
 
Let's look at some major economic statistics for the state of Kansas to get a more accurate picture of the condition of the Kansas budget and economy (as usual, links will be provided at the end):

* Kansas's unemployment rate is 4.2%, about 30% lower than the national rate (5.5%).

* In 2014, Kansas saw a huge jump in manufacturing exports, to the tune of a $400-million-plus increase over the previous year. In fact, 2014 saw the state's exports top $12 billion, a record only matched in two other years in the state's history.

* Last year Kansas exporters outpaced their competition in the neighboring four states (Colorado, Missouri, Nebraska and Oklahoma). Their average export value was $9.74 billion, $2.26 billion less than that of Kansas.

* Kansas has the sixth lowest cost of living in the country. The cost of living in Kansas is nearly 8.74% below the national average.

* Housing costs in Kansas are especially low, with the median value of owner-occupied homes nearly 216.7% below the national average.

* Kansas ranks 22nd in the country Kansas in the Tax Foundation's State Business Tax Climate Index. In 2011, Kansas ranked 25th, so the state's tax climate has improved substantially since 2011. The index compares the states in five areas of taxation that impact business: corporate taxes, individual income taxes, sales taxes, unemployment insurance taxes, and taxes on property, including residential and commercial property.

* Kansas governor Sam Brownback was awarded an "A" by the fiscally conservative Cato Institute for his tax cuts and spending restraint and for reducing the size of the state bureaucracy. Said Cato,

Sam Brownback of Kansas has spearheaded major tax reforms. In 2012 he signed into law a package that reduced the number of individual income tax brackets from three to two and cut the top tax rate from 6.45 to 4.9 percent. The reform also increased the standard deduction, reduced taxes on small businesses, and repealed numerous narrow tax breaks. Brownback approved additional changes in 2013, including further income tax rate cuts, broadening the income tax base, and increasing the sales tax rate. The governor has also been a frugal budgeter since 2012, overseeing just small increases in general fund spending.

* Americans for Tax Reform has called Brownback's 2015 budget sound and frugal. You have to keep in mind that any Republican governor who imposes even modest fiscal restraint will be accused of taking food from babies, starving grandmas, gutting "education," etc., etc. So the Americans for Tax Reform analysis is a good reality check on Brownback's budget.

* The majority of the budget shortfall has nothing--as in nothing--to do with Brownback's tax cuts.

* The Kansas real median household income is slightly higher than the national average.

* Kansas GDP growth has been above or at the national average since Brownback took office, and it has been nearly double that of Obama's home state of Illinois. In September 2014, economist Stephen Moore noted,

On economic growth, the Bureau of Economic Analysis reports that Kansas’ real GDP increase was up 1.9 % last year – slighter higher than the national average of 1.8%. Illinois crept up 0.9%.

Much more could be said about the overall positive direction of the Kansas budget and economy under Republican leadership, but this will have to suffice for now.

So the next time you see some liberal claim that Kansas is somehow "proof" that conservative economic policies don't work, remind him or her of these facts.

Kansas is not "tax starved." Laying off 7,000 state workers frees up a lot of money for other things. Overall, Kansas is doing very well. Just because the state government is not getting as much money as it did in the past does not mean the economy is doing badly. It just means that the state government needs to trim down, which is exactly what it is doing.

Kansas State Unemployment Rate and Total Unemployed Department of Numbers

Kansas Department of Commerce - Official Website

Kansas Department of Commerce - Official Website - Quality of Life

Cost of Living in Kansas - PayScale

Kansas Tax Foundation

Pro-liberty Republican governors are slashing high taxes and rolling back big government -- and that s good for taxpayers United Liberty Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government

http://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/fprc-on-americas-governors_1.pdf

Sam Brownback United Liberty Free Market - Individual Liberty - Limited Government

Sam Brownback Americans for Tax Reform

Here s How Kansas Is Flourishing Under Republican Governor Sam Brownback

Kansas State Household Income Department of Numbers
 
*Even though most tax revenue is from the poor and middle class, and corporations receive tax credits and subsidies that often exceed the tax they pay.

How does that work since 1% of taxpayers pay 40% of taxes, 5% pay 60% and 50% pay 100%?

Not very good at math, are you?
Incorrect. What is 100-48.9? 51.1.
In 2013, according to our analysis of preliminary IRS data, people with adjusted gross incomes above $250,000 paid nearly half (48.9%) of all individual income taxes, though they accounted for only 2.4% of all returns filed. Their average tax rate (total taxes paid divided by cumulative AGI) was 25.6%. By contrast, people whose incomes were less than $50,000 accounted for 63.4% of all individual income tax returns filed in 2013, but they paid just 6.2% of total taxes; their average tax rate was 4.2%.
High-income Americans pay most income taxes but enough to be fair Pew Research Center
Though, if you include all those that earn below 1 million a year (which I am referring to), then you are well above that 51.1%.

I said 1% pay 40%, 5% pay 60%. You came back with that 2.4% pay about half. That contradicts me how?

And you said poor and middle class pay most of the taxes, which is obviously ridiculous
 
I smell bullshit

Savage, Levin, Limbaugh or Hannity?
It's all the same BS

Brietbart, Savage, Drudge, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, or Hannity

People shouldn't be allowed to listen to people you disagree with
I'm amazed by the difference between what I write, and think, and how your head processes it sometimes.

I listen to those guys, so what made you believe I don't want it allowed?

Answer: One or all of those guys told you it's what I want, and that residual misleading and false impression was rattling around in your psyche, ready to be thrown out in haste

Yes, only liberals think, everyone else is told what to think by talk radio. And somehow the liberals who think all think the same thing and conservatives are telling me to be libertarian. Why are they doing that again? Pure rhetorical genius on your part, LOL
Oh the myriad misleading and false impressions.

You are good for something Kaz.

They're not telling you what to think.

Right wing media hold focus groups to find out what their target demographic audience wants to hear.

In this case, that's you.

Then they all say that.

You stay tuned in listening to their advertisers, and voting for Republicans.

And you get the validation you seek.

I voted Republican once in the last six elections, moron
 
Furloughing government workers is a great thing to do for the people!

It's always good when the tax burden is lightened. Of course, libs think government helps by creating more unneeded government jobs even though it makes life harder for the average worker. Government cannot create wealth and merely makes it disappear by confiscating and spending it.

People have considered government jobs to be the most secure. Unlike the private sector, government does not need to be good at what they do. No matter how badly they fail, they simply steal more money to keep going. Private businesses have to deliver on promises or they go under.
 
I said 1% pay 40%, 5% pay 60%. You came back with that 2.4% pay about half. That contradicts me how?

And you said poor and middle class pay most of the taxes, which is obviously ridiculous

We all know that nearly half not only get out of paying taxes but they get "refunds" that they never paid in. The middle class always gets screwed.
 
Newsflash, money people earn belongs to them not the state allowing people to keep their own money they earned isn't a gift from government.
Newsflash.....read the constitution
It doesn't. Government has the responsibility to levy taxes

LOL, no, big guy. It says it has the authority to, that is not a responsibility to do it. This is why I keep pointing out your atrocious reading skills. They are really bad. Have you considered remedial reading?
I noticed after all these years Republicans kept talking about no new taxes and cutting taxes but really only for the rich now the roads are falling apart and they have to raise taxes on all of us why didn't they not lower taxes on the rich so they would have that money now to build the roads you see this is shifting the tax burden unto us when they lower the rich taxes that ultimately raises our taxes

Lol
I mean it only makes sense billionaires and millionaires and corporations are not paying the same amount of taxes they did under Bill Clinton then more of that national debt that were looking at is shifted the burden is shifted on you and me is that not true?

I actually heard a great man Thom Hartmann say don't just roll back the Bush tax breaks but roll back the Reagan tax breaks to imagine the money we're not getting because of these Republicans scoundrels we're doing the building of the Rich who are now not paying their appropriate Cher

Riiiight because giving more money to idiots in government who have proven they cannot manage the trillions they already confiscate is a brilliant idea /sarcasm
 
Jerry Brown, having grown cantankerous and salty compared to his days as "moon beam"...has arguably managed to "balance" California's budget. The resulting new expenses for medi-cal/Medicaid expansion in California has the potential to derail that balance.

Riiiight and the California $300+ billion dollar public pension shortfall? Balanced budget my ass.
Brown is addressing that along with his budget, but that's just not an issue that get's resolved over night.

The idea that you can resolve that over night is a key element of the GOP's economic scaremongering

Look if I'm $300 freaking billion in debt I'm not finding new things to spend money I don't have on.
 

Forum List

Back
Top