Lakhota
Diamond Member
- Jul 14, 2011
- 167,630
- 93,037
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm...maybe with folks like you, gun "registration" would be more appropriate. Unless - you're a law-abiding gun owner. I would suggest you only put 10 rounds in your magazines until further notice...
BTW, do you always obey the speed limits?
Actually I haven't had a speeding ticket since the early 70's and it was dismissed. And I'll keep my 14+1 when I carry, there is no law against it. You did't answer how you would verify checks, come on give us the details.
How are checks currently verified? How does E-Verify work?
Actually I haven't had a speeding ticket since the early 70's and it was dismissed. And I'll keep my 14+1 when I carry, there is no law against it. You did't answer how you would verify checks, come on give us the details.
How are checks currently verified? How does E-Verify work?
Only FFL holder can access the NICS system, so if I want to make a private sale how would I get a background check on the buyer? And if I didn't how would anyone know? You see this hasn't been very well thought out on your side. Slogans are fine but at some point you have to address the details to implement them.
By EVAN MCMORRIS-SANTORO
Women who dont usually vote in midterm elections the same women who generally drive Democratic victories will turn out in 2014 over the issue of guns, according to a recent poll.
The survey released by Women Donors Network, a self-described progressive community of women philanthropists, found that a subset of women voters who usually dont vote in midterm elections are more likely to vote in 2014 on the issue of gun violence.
That echoes what former Rep. Steve LaTourette (OH), now a militant moderate leader in the Republican Party, said on Tuesday when he cautioned his party against sticking too close to the National Rifle Association in the post-Newtown legislative push to reduce gun violence. If the GOP is seen as being in the pocket of the NRA, he said, it could cost the party big with women in future elections.
The survey, which was conducted by Democratic pollster Diane Feldman and Republican pollster Bob Carpenter using live phone calls to 1,500 women, found that women who may not ordinarily vote in a non-presidential year are among those most engaged with issues of gun violence. The group also posted a PDF slide deck presenting the polls findings.
Feldman explained in an interview with TPM on Wednesday the results mean guns could be good politics for Democrats.
As we approach the 2014 congressional elections, the question will be to what degree do single women, lower income women, persons of color participate since thats the Democratic edge, she said. And this is an issue that can encourage them to participate.
Strong support for universal background checks on firearms purchases and a focus on mental health and reducing violence in schools could rally these women to the polls in unexpected numbers in 2014, Feldman said. They also happen to be part of President Obamas proposals following the Newtown, Conn., school massacre. Feldman called the potential increase in minority and lower income women voters significant. And that could change the dynamics of the election (thought it would also have an impact dependent upon the demographics of given congressional districts.)
More: Gun Issue May Drive Women To 2014 Polls | TPMDC
Poll
How are checks currently verified? How does E-Verify work?
Only FFL holder can access the NICS system, so if I want to make a private sale how would I get a background check on the buyer? And if I didn't how would anyone know? You see this hasn't been very well thought out on your side. Slogans are fine but at some point you have to address the details to implement them.
Well, maybe you'd have to have someone with a FFL to do it for you until the system is fully developed. I can assure you it has been thought out more than you may think - and many are working hard to improve the system. It won't become perfect overnight. Are you part of the solution or part of the problem?
Only FFL holder can access the NICS system, so if I want to make a private sale how would I get a background check on the buyer? And if I didn't how would anyone know? You see this hasn't been very well thought out on your side. Slogans are fine but at some point you have to address the details to implement them.
Well, maybe you'd have to have someone with a FFL to do it for you until the system is fully developed. I can assure you it has been thought out more than you may think - and many are working hard to improve the system. It won't become perfect overnight. Are you part of the solution or part of the problem?
Trust me until I get satisfactory details that I can live with I'll be a problem for those that just want to throw shit against the wall to see if any of it sticks. The problem is the folks that will never willingly cooperate with any of your schemes they're know as criminals. Do you think the ones committing all the gun crimes will actually abide by anything that is passed? Why aren't the efforts focused on them?
Well, maybe you'd have to have someone with a FFL to do it for you until the system is fully developed. I can assure you it has been thought out more than you may think - and many are working hard to improve the system. It won't become perfect overnight. Are you part of the solution or part of the problem?
Trust me until I get satisfactory details that I can live with I'll be a problem for those that just want to throw shit against the wall to see if any of it sticks. The problem is the folks that will never willingly cooperate with any of your schemes they're know as criminals. Do you think the ones committing all the gun crimes will actually abide by anything that is passed? Why aren't the efforts focused on them?
I consider trying to dry up criminals' sources for weapons to be focusing on them - but the NRA gun nutters don't seem to want to help. Why is that?
Well, maybe you'd have to have someone with a FFL to do it for you until the system is fully developed. I can assure you it has been thought out more than you may think - and many are working hard to improve the system. It won't become perfect overnight. Are you part of the solution or part of the problem?
Trust me until I get satisfactory details that I can live with I'll be a problem for those that just want to throw shit against the wall to see if any of it sticks. The problem is the folks that will never willingly cooperate with any of your schemes they're know as criminals. Do you think the ones committing all the gun crimes will actually abide by anything that is passed? Why aren't the efforts focused on them?
I consider trying to dry up criminals' sources for weapons to be focusing on them - but the NRA gun nutters don't seem to want to help. Why is that?
Trust me until I get satisfactory details that I can live with I'll be a problem for those that just want to throw shit against the wall to see if any of it sticks. The problem is the folks that will never willingly cooperate with any of your schemes they're know as criminals. Do you think the ones committing all the gun crimes will actually abide by anything that is passed? Why aren't the efforts focused on them?
I consider trying to dry up criminals' sources for weapons to be focusing on them - but the NRA gun nutters don't seem to want to help. Why is that?
How do back Ground checks dry up sources for Criminals? That Vast Majority of all guns sold to Criminals are not sold at Gun Shows, But on the street by other Criminals.
I consider trying to dry up criminals' sources for weapons to be focusing on them - but the NRA gun nutters don't seem to want to help. Why is that?
How do back Ground checks dry up sources for Criminals? That Vast Majority of all guns sold to Criminals are not sold at Gun Shows, But on the street by other Criminals.
Well, by cracky, we need to also dry up their sources.
Sandy Hook has solid repub women asking why assault weapons are needed. The GOP will be the deciding vote to allow the weapons to remain in society. They will each collect their checks from the NRA. Maybe Boner will hand them out again.
Then it is likely there will be another mass shooting before 2016. Just another nail in the the GOP coffin.
That echoes what former Rep. Steve LaTourette (OH), now a militant moderate leader in the Republican Party, said on Tuesday when he cautioned his party against sticking too close to the National Rifle Association in the post-Newtown legislative push to reduce gun violence. If the GOP is seen as being in the pocket of the NRA, he said, it could cost the party big with women in future elections.
From the OP link.
Believe it or not and this will be difficult for liberals to believe but there are women in fact lots of them who like to shoot guns to.
You Bozos really think you can keep this scaremongering freakery up for a year and a half and it'll be effective?The article is talking about "women who don't usually vote in midterm elections"...
It's the first sentence in the OP.
Really?![]()
There will be far more who see you trying to keep thier one equalizer away from them. Women of all people understand the most how a gun evens the playing field.
I don't think most intelligent women will succumb to the dishonest fearmongering that democrats are trying to take all guns away.
The left is fearmongering in the gun issue?????
What about the right wing's rants: "Tha criminals is gonna get ya, if dey takes me guns, only criminals will haves guns!!! And the GUBMINT!! Tha tyrannikal gubmint, deyz a comin fur ya I tell ya dey comin fur ya!!! Even the boogey man is coming fur ya!"