Sallow
The Big Bad Wolf.
- Thread starter
- #21
So actually what Barack has done, was adopt Hillary Care as his own, and then went forward with it because he knew it would sell finally under his reign of deceit maybe ? So Hillary has been in the back drop all along, just like with her husband while she was pushing the buttons, yet meanwhile her husband was undoing the buttons ? Hmmm, so she is in the back drop of Obama, and was pushing his buttons as well ?Gee, coming from a party who pushed through a law that made it harder for the poor to get healthcare due to rising premiums, AND stripped 6.3 million people of their insurance?
Not exactly a stellar track record there, my friend.
Oh, and this concept isn't new. Hillary was doing the same thing with her stab at universal healthcare. First it was Hillarycare, and that same lie pops up. "If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor, period" (if not in those exact words).
You’ll pick the health plan and the doctor of your choice. ... It’s one thing to say we’ll preserve your option to pick the doctor of your choice (recognizing this will cost more), it’s quite another to appear to promise the nation that everyone will get to pick the doctor of his or her choice. And that’s exactly what this line does. I am very worried about getting skewered for over-promising here on something we know full well we won’t deliver.
/thread
It seems that healthcare is the one thing that has the ability to break people with the obscene prices that are attached to it, so taking control of the health care, also takes control of the wealthy and the middle of the road wealthy (working class), in which in turns takes that wealth, and then redistributes it to the government in order for them to take care of the ones who are not wealthy but are poor and dependent instead. The sad thing, is that the poor and dependent are gaining in numbers like a wildfire streaking across an open plane of under brush out of control. Somehow things have been allowed to get way out of balance over time, and now everyone is trying to hold on against the onslaught of these wild eyed plans in which assumes that everyone below a certain level has been wronged in the system of things.
Now for the defense of my compassion for human beings having dignity, even in their sickness where as everyone needs dignity in healthcare, and their sickness no matter what age they are in their life, and the one thing we all know is that people absolutely need healthcare, and if I was in charge healthcare would be the one thing that is taken off of the table, and out of the profit making business forever. Period!
To make extreme profits or worry about not making huge profits when it comes to someone either living or dying (imho) is an evil thing. Now back in the day it wasn't as bad, but it has gotten to the point that it went all out crazy now, and now we have people jumping all over it, and then taking advantage of it whether in some form or another while they can. As long as the profits are involved, then sick people will be judged by the lack of profiteering in which the industry thinks will be lost in each case or gained in each case, and this could determine whether people may live or die all depending. It is an unacceptable thing, and we as a nation can do better than this. Period!
To address some of your points:
1. This isn't "HillaryCare" which is employer based. This was the Heritage's foundation's alternative. It was floated by Bob Dole at the time and adopted by Mitt Romney. It includes the "Individual Mandate" which places the requirement on the person to secure their own health care.
2. The "somehow allowed" was a very deliberate strategy by corporate heads to lower taxes, get rid of protections on labor, and get rid of regulations. In other words, to undo the New Deal.
3. Personally? I agree with you about getting healthcare out of the private sector.