- Thread starter
- #21
Yesterday; found more than enough evidence of criminal racketeering to approve the investigation. There are three more counties that turned in data on fraudulent results as well, that haven't been ruled on yet. They involve fraudulent mail in ballots and defrauding the elderly, just as one would expect from Democrats. The Dallas investigation will be about ballots from west Dallas, La Raza Land. Looks like that 'Hillary Popular Vote' lie will be just another silly ridiculous claim like all the rest.
Umm...
This investigation is regarding a city council race last week, not last year's Presidential election.
And there were no "Democrats" in the race, which is a non-partisan election.
The evidence they used came directly from the evidence acquired for the state investigation and turned over to the state Attorney General, so yes, it is about the Presidential election, and will be included in those indictments. That's why I brought up the other counties as well. The ballots are all on the same sheet here, they don't have separate ballots for each office. I guess one could claim they would only have manipulated the voting box on just one race on the balot and magically left all the rest alone, but then that would be a stupid claim.
Hillary Clinton was not on any ballot in last Saturday's election in Dallas.
You understand that, right?
You understand they used mail in ballots in the general elections, right? Why do you think the local juries are specifically looking at those? Are they just guessing?
Here's where your reading comprehension failed you.
The grand jury isn't looking at mail-in ballots from last year's election. They're looking at mail-in ballots from last week's election.
You understand that they aren't the same ballots, right?
You understand you're desperate, right? You get the concept of a state investigation releasing evidence to local grand juries as they deem necessary, right?