Grand Jury in Dallas Approves Criminal Voter Fraud Investigation

Yesterday; found more than enough evidence of criminal racketeering to approve the investigation. There are three more counties that turned in data on fraudulent results as well, that haven't been ruled on yet. They involve fraudulent mail in ballots and defrauding the elderly, just as one would expect from Democrats. The Dallas investigation will be about ballots from west Dallas, La Raza Land. Looks like that 'Hillary Popular Vote' lie will be just another silly ridiculous claim like all the rest.

Umm...

This investigation is regarding a city council race last week, not last year's Presidential election.

And there were no "Democrats" in the race, which is a non-partisan election.

The evidence they used came directly from the evidence acquired for the state investigation and turned over to the state Attorney General, so yes, it is about the Presidential election, and will be included in those indictments. That's why I brought up the other counties as well. The ballots are all on the same sheet here, they don't have separate ballots for each office. I guess one could claim they would only have manipulated the voting box on just one race on the balot and magically left all the rest alone, but then that would be a stupid claim.

Hillary Clinton was not on any ballot in last Saturday's election in Dallas.

You understand that, right?

You understand they used mail in ballots in the general elections, right? Why do you think the local juries are specifically looking at those? Are they just guessing?

Here's where your reading comprehension failed you.

The grand jury isn't looking at mail-in ballots from last year's election. They're looking at mail-in ballots from last week's election.

You understand that they aren't the same ballots, right?

You understand you're desperate, right? You get the concept of a state investigation releasing evidence to local grand juries as they deem necessary, right?
 
Umm...

This investigation is regarding a city council race last week, not last year's Presidential election.

And there were no "Democrats" in the race, which is a non-partisan election.

The evidence they used came directly from the evidence acquired for the state investigation and turned over to the state Attorney General, so yes, it is about the Presidential election, and will be included in those indictments. That's why I brought up the other counties as well. The ballots are all on the same sheet here, they don't have separate ballots for each office. I guess one could claim they would only have manipulated the voting box on just one race on the balot and magically left all the rest alone, but then that would be a stupid claim.

Hillary Clinton was not on any ballot in last Saturday's election in Dallas.

You understand that, right?

You understand they used mail in ballots in the general elections, right? Why do you think the local juries are specifically looking at those? Are they just guessing?

Here's where your reading comprehension failed you.

The grand jury isn't looking at mail-in ballots from last year's election. They're looking at mail-in ballots from last week's election.

You understand that they aren't the same ballots, right?

You understand you're desperate, right? You get the concept of a state investigation releasing evidence to local grand juries right?

:lol:

I see that rather than being an adult, and admitting you were wrong, you've decided to just dig yourself in deeper.

I mean, whatever helps you sleep at night, but even I'm feeling embarrassed for you.
 
Yesterday; found more than enough evidence of criminal racketeering to approve the investigation. There are three more counties that turned in data on fraudulent results as well, that haven't been ruled on yet. They involve fraudulent mail in ballots and defrauding the elderly, just as one would expect from Democrats. The Dallas investigation will be about ballots from west Dallas, La Raza Land. Looks like that 'Hillary Popular Vote' lie will be just another silly ridiculous claim like all the rest.

Mail in ballots? How does requiring restrictive ID at the polls stop mail in fraud?

Where did I say anything about voter ID's?
 
The evidence they used came directly from the evidence acquired for the state investigation and turned over to the state Attorney General, so yes, it is about the Presidential election, and will be included in those indictments. That's why I brought up the other counties as well. The ballots are all on the same sheet here, they don't have separate ballots for each office. I guess one could claim they would only have manipulated the voting box on just one race on the balot and magically left all the rest alone, but then that would be a stupid claim.

Hillary Clinton was not on any ballot in last Saturday's election in Dallas.

You understand that, right?

You understand they used mail in ballots in the general elections, right? Why do you think the local juries are specifically looking at those? Are they just guessing?

Here's where your reading comprehension failed you.

The grand jury isn't looking at mail-in ballots from last year's election. They're looking at mail-in ballots from last week's election.

You understand that they aren't the same ballots, right?

You understand you're desperate, right? You get the concept of a state investigation releasing evidence to local grand juries right?

:lol:

I see that rather than being an adult, and admitting you were wrong, you've decided to just dig yourself in deeper.

I mean, whatever helps you sleep at night, but even I'm feeling embarrassed for you.

lol rather than being an adult, you're now playing 'I Touched You Last!!!' like a schoolyard kid, who can't get anywhere, and projecting at that.
 
Yesterday; found more than enough evidence of criminal racketeering to approve the investigation. There are three more counties that turned in data on fraudulent results as well, that haven't been ruled on yet. They involve fraudulent mail in ballots and defrauding the elderly, just as one would expect from Democrats. The Dallas investigation will be about ballots from west Dallas, La Raza Land. Looks like that 'Hillary Popular Vote' lie will be just another silly ridiculous claim like all the rest.

Umm...

This investigation is regarding a city council race last week, not last year's Presidential election.

And there were no "Democrats" in the race, which is a non-partisan election.

The evidence they used came directly from the evidence acquired for the state investigation and turned over to the state Attorney General, so yes, it is about the Presidential election, and will be included in those indictments. That's why I brought up the other counties as well.

:lol:

So far, the only result of a Google search that turns up anything close to your claims is this thread. Every other result speaks only of an investigation into last week's election.

Now, unless you've got something to support your claims, I'm going to assume that either you're a moron who doesn't understand what you've read, or just a run-of-the-mill liar.

Which is it, then?

Well I found 3 stories right at the top of my search. Are you still trying to use that recycled Etch-A -Sketch somebody sold you at a flea market as a 'computer'?

Criminal investigation opens into West Dallas voter fraud after 'off the charts' allegations | Elections | Dallas News

Texas attorney general using Rockwall County grand jury to investigate voter fraud in Dallas County | News | Dallas News

Dallas County looking into voter fraud complaints

:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.
 
Hillary Clinton was not on any ballot in last Saturday's election in Dallas.

You understand that, right?

You understand they used mail in ballots in the general elections, right? Why do you think the local juries are specifically looking at those? Are they just guessing?

Here's where your reading comprehension failed you.

The grand jury isn't looking at mail-in ballots from last year's election. They're looking at mail-in ballots from last week's election.

You understand that they aren't the same ballots, right?

You understand you're desperate, right? You get the concept of a state investigation releasing evidence to local grand juries right?

:lol:

I see that rather than being an adult, and admitting you were wrong, you've decided to just dig yourself in deeper.

I mean, whatever helps you sleep at night, but even I'm feeling embarrassed for you.

lol rather than being an adult, you're now playing 'I Touched You Last!!!' like a schoolyard kid, who can't get anywhere, and projecting at that.

I know you're upset that you fucked up.

But blaming it on me isn't going to help.
 
The lesson here today:

Don't post links that you didn't bother to read, or failed to understand
.
 
Yesterday; found more than enough evidence of criminal racketeering to approve the investigation. There are three more counties that turned in data on fraudulent results as well, that haven't been ruled on yet. They involve fraudulent mail in ballots and defrauding the elderly, just as one would expect from Democrats. The Dallas investigation will be about ballots from west Dallas, La Raza Land. Looks like that 'Hillary Popular Vote' lie will be just another silly ridiculous claim like all the rest.

Umm...

This investigation is regarding a city council race last week, not last year's Presidential election.

And there were no "Democrats" in the race, which is a non-partisan election.

The evidence they used came directly from the evidence acquired for the state investigation and turned over to the state Attorney General, so yes, it is about the Presidential election, and will be included in those indictments. That's why I brought up the other counties as well.

:lol:

So far, the only result of a Google search that turns up anything close to your claims is this thread. Every other result speaks only of an investigation into last week's election.

Now, unless you've got something to support your claims, I'm going to assume that either you're a moron who doesn't understand what you've read, or just a run-of-the-mill liar.

Which is it, then?

Well I found 3 stories right at the top of my search. Are you still trying to use that recycled Etch-A -Sketch somebody sold you at a flea market as a 'computer'?

Criminal investigation opens into West Dallas voter fraud after 'off the charts' allegations | Elections | Dallas News

Texas attorney general using Rockwall County grand jury to investigate voter fraud in Dallas County | News | Dallas News

Dallas County looking into voter fraud complaints

:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?
 
Umm...

This investigation is regarding a city council race last week, not last year's Presidential election.

And there were no "Democrats" in the race, which is a non-partisan election.

The evidence they used came directly from the evidence acquired for the state investigation and turned over to the state Attorney General, so yes, it is about the Presidential election, and will be included in those indictments. That's why I brought up the other counties as well.

:lol:

So far, the only result of a Google search that turns up anything close to your claims is this thread. Every other result speaks only of an investigation into last week's election.

Now, unless you've got something to support your claims, I'm going to assume that either you're a moron who doesn't understand what you've read, or just a run-of-the-mill liar.

Which is it, then?

Well I found 3 stories right at the top of my search. Are you still trying to use that recycled Etch-A -Sketch somebody sold you at a flea market as a 'computer'?

Criminal investigation opens into West Dallas voter fraud after 'off the charts' allegations | Elections | Dallas News

Texas attorney general using Rockwall County grand jury to investigate voter fraud in Dallas County | News | Dallas News

Dallas County looking into voter fraud complaints

:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.
 
The evidence they used came directly from the evidence acquired for the state investigation and turned over to the state Attorney General, so yes, it is about the Presidential election, and will be included in those indictments. That's why I brought up the other counties as well.

:lol:

So far, the only result of a Google search that turns up anything close to your claims is this thread. Every other result speaks only of an investigation into last week's election.

Now, unless you've got something to support your claims, I'm going to assume that either you're a moron who doesn't understand what you've read, or just a run-of-the-mill liar.

Which is it, then?

Well I found 3 stories right at the top of my search. Are you still trying to use that recycled Etch-A -Sketch somebody sold you at a flea market as a 'computer'?

Criminal investigation opens into West Dallas voter fraud after 'off the charts' allegations | Elections | Dallas News

Texas attorney general using Rockwall County grand jury to investigate voter fraud in Dallas County | News | Dallas News

Dallas County looking into voter fraud complaints

:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.
 
:lol:

So far, the only result of a Google search that turns up anything close to your claims is this thread. Every other result speaks only of an investigation into last week's election.

Now, unless you've got something to support your claims, I'm going to assume that either you're a moron who doesn't understand what you've read, or just a run-of-the-mill liar.

Which is it, then?

Well I found 3 stories right at the top of my search. Are you still trying to use that recycled Etch-A -Sketch somebody sold you at a flea market as a 'computer'?

Criminal investigation opens into West Dallas voter fraud after 'off the charts' allegations | Elections | Dallas News

Texas attorney general using Rockwall County grand jury to investigate voter fraud in Dallas County | News | Dallas News

Dallas County looking into voter fraud complaints

:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.

You don't seem to understand what we're discussing here.

You have claimed that the grand jury is investigating voter fraud in last year's Presidential election. This is false. They are investigating voter fraud in last week's City Council election.

The mechanics of how information is passed from the state to the grand jury is not part of our disagreement
 
Thread fail of the month award.

1430856343_1511897956.jpg
 

:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.

You don't seem to understand what we're discussing here.

You have claimed that the grand jury is investigating voter fraud in last year's Presidential election. This is false. They are investigating voter fraud in last week's City Council election.

The mechanics of how information is passed from the state to the grand jury is not part of our disagreement
You are not even an American so explain again why anything you have to say about our election process matters?
 

:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.

You don't seem to understand what we're discussing here.

You have claimed that the grand jury is investigating voter fraud in last year's Presidential election. This is false. They are investigating voter fraud in last week's City Council election.

The mechanics of how information is passed from the state to the grand jury is not part of our disagreement

Actually it was indeed part of the topic; you just like to pretend it isn't, because you stepped on your nuts, that's all.
 
:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.

You don't seem to understand what we're discussing here.

You have claimed that the grand jury is investigating voter fraud in last year's Presidential election. This is false. They are investigating voter fraud in last week's City Council election.

The mechanics of how information is passed from the state to the grand jury is not part of our disagreement
You are not even an American so explain again why anything you have to say about our election process matters?

What are you talking about, clown shoes?

I'm an American, born and raised. I live in California.
 
:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.

You don't seem to understand what we're discussing here.

You have claimed that the grand jury is investigating voter fraud in last year's Presidential election. This is false. They are investigating voter fraud in last week's City Council election.

The mechanics of how information is passed from the state to the grand jury is not part of our disagreement
You are not even an American so explain again why anything you have to say about our election process matters?

Because he's a troll, and thinks spam is 'winning'.
 
:lol:

I just realized - one of your links is from 6 years ago.

This is funnier than I even thought.

So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.

You don't seem to understand what we're discussing here.

You have claimed that the grand jury is investigating voter fraud in last year's Presidential election. This is false. They are investigating voter fraud in last week's City Council election.

The mechanics of how information is passed from the state to the grand jury is not part of our disagreement

Actually it was indeed part of the topic; you just like to pretend it isn't, because you stepped on your nuts, that's all.

:lol:

No it's not. And at no point in this conversation did I "step on my nuts".

Don't try to blame me for your failures in following this conversation, either. You're already proven your reading comprehension issues.
 
So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.

You don't seem to understand what we're discussing here.

You have claimed that the grand jury is investigating voter fraud in last year's Presidential election. This is false. They are investigating voter fraud in last week's City Council election.

The mechanics of how information is passed from the state to the grand jury is not part of our disagreement
You are not even an American so explain again why anything you have to say about our election process matters?

What are you talking about, clown shoes?

I'm an American, born and raised. I live in California.

California isn't an American state. Try again. It's Mexico with freeways.
 
So? You think ballot fraud just got invented yesterday?

:lol:

Keep digging.

'Yes, you do have a deep hole there .. otherwise you would have noticed the older story verifies how the state AG feeds evidence to local grand juries, hence why it's posted there. All you did was make yourself look rather simple-minded.

You don't seem to understand what we're discussing here.

You have claimed that the grand jury is investigating voter fraud in last year's Presidential election. This is false. They are investigating voter fraud in last week's City Council election.

The mechanics of how information is passed from the state to the grand jury is not part of our disagreement

Actually it was indeed part of the topic; you just like to pretend it isn't, because you stepped on your nuts, that's all.

:lol:

No it's not. And at no point in this conversation did I "step on my nuts".

Don't try to blame me for your failures in following this conversation, either. You're already proven your reading comprehension issues.

You wish you could sell that, but you can't.
 
Yesterday; found more than enough evidence of criminal racketeering to approve the investigation. There are three more counties that turned in data on fraudulent results as well, that haven't been ruled on yet. They involve fraudulent mail in ballots and defrauding the elderly, just as one would expect from Democrats. The Dallas investigation will be about ballots from west Dallas, La Raza Land. Looks like that 'Hillary Popular Vote' lie will be just another silly ridiculous claim like all the rest.

Looks like another Trumpster trying to come up with the votes to support the lie that there were 3 million illegal votes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top