so then why is he getting grilled on whether or not he thinks people are stupid?Ya think?....I guess it might have to be considered, or at least they will decide to consider it, if the lawyers offer it.The SCOTUS won't consider that.Thanks, but I was wondering why they have a hearing about it. What is the desired, or productive, outcome of it all?
Their is an obamacare case at the Supreme Court right now.....his confessing to what they did might make some changes in how they rule next time...considering they committed fraud in front of the Court...
They're deciding if federal exchanges can provide ACA plans with subsidies in states that do not have thier own exchanges.
Calling Americans idiots, which I agree is true, has nothing to do with that
The tape where Gruber admits that the subsidies were meant as a carrot might be evidence in legislative history they will consider.
If it's compelling, the GOP lawyer might do t, but if it isn't, they won't risk it.
The guy was a paid consultant or contractor on the development of the legislation. Seems to me that the issue is the intent behind the words of the law, which presumably one of the key architects would know.