candycorn
Diamond Member
Oh?Better look now but ISIS, doesnât seem to be the Jr Varsity team who gives out candy.She does? Iâd love to view the quote to where Secretary Clinton âadmitsâ that she caused the ME âbeing in flamesâ. First, she wouldnât use such soporific prose. Secondly, the ME has been âin flamesâ as YOU put it since it was arbitrarily created in the post World War era by the victors.Iâll stand to be corrected on this.
Please quote her as saying as such.
Hillary Clinton forgets Benghazi, claims âwe did not lose a single Americanâ in Libya
And before you say it, Benghazi was a continuation of the war that Hillary and Obama help start.
The full quote:
"âWhen [former Libyan leader Msoammar] Gadhafi was threatening to massacre his population, I put together a coalition that included NATO, included the Arab League, and we were able to save lives. We did not lose a single American in that action,â she said.
Ahh, context. Refreshing.
Hardly different. It is great that she admits that her raining death and destruction down on Libya was her fault. She admits that the who caused the ME being in flames and the greatest humanitarian crisis since WW2 is all her fault.
I suppose you preferred Quadhifi be able to âmassacre his populationâ as she put it?
So weâve traded one established dictator who sends terrorists out into the world to wreak havoc for a much less influential group of losers who send terrorists out into the world? Itâs a net win. The costs is a destabilized Libya and while I would prefer that no other nation suffer the fate of having a self-appointed dictator run itâs affairsâŚI can live wit it.Simply amazing and you still support her? She admits to creating the power vacuum where ISIS was able to thrive.
Interesting that we did the same thing in Iraq; toppled a murderous dictator and spent the next 8 years over 2 administrations trying to come to terms with it.
Double standard on your part? You betcha.
It shows you the limits of American power when we insist on a âgood little warâ being the only costs weâre willing to bear for intervention. We need to come back with total annihilation when provoked accordingly.
Look at the this video, and you want THAT as president? Really? I can't imagine if Bush would have said such an ghoulish thing. This is the POS you support for no other reason than a D behind her name.
Not a Democrat.
Just a liberal.
She is the best qualified person to seek the office in 30 years. So she gets my vote.
And you equate brutality with some sort of advanced threat? When you look at their standard MO, itâs basically what Kleibold and Harris did; suit up some fairly small weapons and attack soft targets. Precisely what happened at the McDonalds in San Yisidro in 1989 if I recall.Many people have been burned alive, drowned, beheaded, yet I guess you donât have an issue with that?
Advanced terrorism is 9/11, twin synchronized attacks on embassies in two nations, and having soldiers in the field who are capable of carrying out plans; not having to use your own bomb maker to detonate the bombs.
Are these attacks terror attacks? Sure. Are they anything more than what some gang banger does with a pistol and a 6th grade education? Not really.
But donât let me spoil your day with facts.