gun-control efforts calls for sheriff to inspect gun owner's homes

[bigrebnc1775]

No, it only shows that you have no intelligent argument.

It shows your fail and that you are full of shit.

Check list you don't have a problem with a complete stranger doing a walk through of your home because he from the guberment, but when it comes too your mother in-law doing an inspection you object.

I never said that I had a problem with my mother in law. When my father in law is in my house, he is always checking our house for safety, and I really appreciate it.

The police here have the right to make sure your guns are stored safely, it is not like they do it all of the time. You just know that it could happen and you had better have them stored safely.

The police don't have any rights other than obey the constitution. the end.

 

[billyerock1991]

http://www.usmessageboard.com/6842702-post1.html

seems your source of information is a tiny bit off
safest cities in America top 100
rank city
100 Mason, OH
99 San Clemente, CA
98 San Juan Capistrano, CA
97 Hoffman Estates, IL
96 Elmhurst, IL
95 Goleta, CA
94 Leawood, KS
93 Northbrook, IL
92 Milton, MA
91 Winter Springs, FL
90 Pacifica, CA
89 Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
88 Upper Arlington, OH
87 San Ramon, CA
86 Lakeville, MN
85 Danville, CA
84 Lake Oswego, OR
83 Brunswick, OH
82 Chino Hills, CA
81 Foster City, CA
80 Shelton, CT
79 Marion, IA
78 Holly Springs, NC
77 Mission Viejo, CA
76 Walnut, CA
75 Carol Stream, IL
74 West Chicago, IL
73 Vernon, CT
72 Park Ridge, IL
71 Midland, MI
70 Kaysville, UT
69 Yorba Linda, CA
68 Palatine, IL
67 Soledad, CA
66 North Andover, MA
65 Leander, TX
64 Keller, TX
63 Peachtree City, GA
62 Lake Forest, CA
61 Spring Hill, TN
60 Menomonee Falls, WI
59 Melrose, MA
58 Mount Prospect, IL
57 Hanover Park, IL
56 Cupertino, CA
55 Germantown, TN
54 Dublin, OH
53 Weston, FL
52 Mundelein, IL
51 Plainfield, IL
50 Parker, CO
49 Fair Lawn, NJ
48 Lincoln, CA
47 Ballwin, MO
46 Shoreview, MN
45 Ossining, NY
44 Bethel Park, PA
43 Moorpark, CA
42 Logan, UT
41 Westfield, NJ
40 Temple City, CA
39 Milton, GA
38 Laguna Niguel, CA
37 Lexington, MA
36 West Linn, OR
35 Buffalo Grove, IL
34 Merrimack, NH
33 Carmel, IN
32 Castle Rock, CO
31 Flower Mound, TX
30 Brentwood, TN
29 Cheshire, CT
28 Glastonbury, CT
27 Fort Lee, NJ
26 Dracut, MA
25 Andover, MA
24 Aliso Viejo, CA
23 Los Altos, CA
22 Long Beach, NY
21 North Ridgeville, OH
20 Friendswood, TX
19 Fishers, IN
18 Little Elm, TX
17 Florence, AZ
16 Needham, MA
15 Wellesley, MA
14 Johns Creek, GA
13 Glen Cove, NY
12 Rexburg, ID
11 Agawam, MA
10 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
9 Shrewsbury, MA
8 Sammamish, WA
7 Saratoga, CA
6 Ridgewood, NJ
5 Bella Vista, AR
4 Bartlett, IL
3 Greenwich, CT
2 Bergenfield, NJ
1 Franklin, MA

correct me if I'm wrong but Georgia doesn't even make the top Ten ... Oh well, so much for those repub-lie-tards truth tellers huh !!!

0 murders in Kennesaw Georgia I gave the stats in that link what are the city sizes and how many murders have they had in the past 25 years and do they have any laws that require it's citizens to have a firearm?

sorry pal your source is not a gubment source ... your source isn't based on murders rape and so on ... it's based on right wing liars ... try again

 

[bigrebnc1775]

seems your source of information is a tiny bit off
safest cities in America top 100
rank city
100 Mason, OH
99 San Clemente, CA
98 San Juan Capistrano, CA
97 Hoffman Estates, IL
96 Elmhurst, IL
95 Goleta, CA
94 Leawood, KS
93 Northbrook, IL
92 Milton, MA
91 Winter Springs, FL
90 Pacifica, CA
89 Rancho Palos Verdes, CA
88 Upper Arlington, OH
87 San Ramon, CA
86 Lakeville, MN
85 Danville, CA
84 Lake Oswego, OR
83 Brunswick, OH
82 Chino Hills, CA
81 Foster City, CA
80 Shelton, CT
79 Marion, IA
78 Holly Springs, NC
77 Mission Viejo, CA
76 Walnut, CA
75 Carol Stream, IL
74 West Chicago, IL
73 Vernon, CT
72 Park Ridge, IL
71 Midland, MI
70 Kaysville, UT
69 Yorba Linda, CA
68 Palatine, IL
67 Soledad, CA
66 North Andover, MA
65 Leander, TX
64 Keller, TX
63 Peachtree City, GA
62 Lake Forest, CA
61 Spring Hill, TN
60 Menomonee Falls, WI
59 Melrose, MA
58 Mount Prospect, IL
57 Hanover Park, IL
56 Cupertino, CA
55 Germantown, TN
54 Dublin, OH
53 Weston, FL
52 Mundelein, IL
51 Plainfield, IL
50 Parker, CO
49 Fair Lawn, NJ
48 Lincoln, CA
47 Ballwin, MO
46 Shoreview, MN
45 Ossining, NY
44 Bethel Park, PA
43 Moorpark, CA
42 Logan, UT
41 Westfield, NJ
40 Temple City, CA
39 Milton, GA
38 Laguna Niguel, CA
37 Lexington, MA
36 West Linn, OR
35 Buffalo Grove, IL
34 Merrimack, NH
33 Carmel, IN
32 Castle Rock, CO
31 Flower Mound, TX
30 Brentwood, TN
29 Cheshire, CT
28 Glastonbury, CT
27 Fort Lee, NJ
26 Dracut, MA
25 Andover, MA
24 Aliso Viejo, CA
23 Los Altos, CA
22 Long Beach, NY
21 North Ridgeville, OH
20 Friendswood, TX
19 Fishers, IN
18 Little Elm, TX
17 Florence, AZ
16 Needham, MA
15 Wellesley, MA
14 Johns Creek, GA
13 Glen Cove, NY
12 Rexburg, ID
11 Agawam, MA
10 Rancho Santa Margarita, CA
9 Shrewsbury, MA
8 Sammamish, WA
7 Saratoga, CA
6 Ridgewood, NJ
5 Bella Vista, AR
4 Bartlett, IL
3 Greenwich, CT
2 Bergenfield, NJ
1 Franklin, MA

correct me if I'm wrong but Georgia doesn't even make the top Ten ... Oh well, so much for those repub-lie-tards truth tellers huh !!!

0 murders in Kennesaw Georgia I gave the stats in that link what are the city sizes and how many murders have they had in the past 25 years and do they have any laws that require it's citizens to have a firearm?

sorry pal your source is not a gubment source ... your source isn't based on murders rape and so on ... it's based on right wing liars ... try again

and ain't your pal bitch and you better re-read the source have any of those cities been murder free FOR THE PAST 25 YEARS with a law that requires it's citizen to have a firearm?

 

[Wicked Jester]

I have lived in Ireland for 16 years. What problem do you have with gun safety?

I don't have a problem with gun safety. I'm well versed and trained on many weapons...I have a problem with armed government officials going into peoples homes for no other reason than to act as Nanny State enforcers.

That may be what Ireland is all about, but that's not what this great country is all about.

Then you are paranoid and I would not say that you live in a great country.

Paranoid?........No!

Living in a free country, who has rights in place to prevent the Government from walking roughshod over its citizens?......Absofuckinglutely!

Of course you don't think this is a great country.....most loony lefty types hate it.

 

[NoNukes]

It shows your fail and that you are full of shit.

Check list you don't have a problem with a complete stranger doing a walk through of your home because he from the guberment, but when it comes too your mother in-law doing an inspection you object.

I never said that I had a problem with my mother in law. When my father in law is in my house, he is always checking our house for safety, and I really appreciate it.

The police here have the right to make sure your guns are stored safely, it is not like they do it all of the time. You just know that it could happen and you had better have them stored safely.

The police don't have any rights other than obey the constitution. the end.

I accept your capitulation.

 

[billyerock1991]

Why? So you have a problem with your mother in-law inspecting your home, but no problem with a complete stranger doing a walk through? BTW your reaction shows that it was a very good comparison

I agree this was a poor attempt on humor ... he must hate his mother in-law

But he luvs his guberment.

so you hate America ??? I guess you do ... by all of your unintelligent remarks here I was wondering ... when you go out side, when you come up from your mother in-laws basement where you live, right after your daddy in-law inspects it for you, do you look for the sky falling too ???? or do you get your daddy in-law to look for you first??? just to make sure its safe for ya????

 

[Wicked Jester]

No, it only shows that you have no intelligent argument.

It shows your fail and that you are full of shit.

Check list you don't have a problem with a complete stranger doing a walk through of your home because he from the guberment, but when it comes too your mother in-law doing an inspection you object.

I never said that I had a problem with my mother in law. When my father in law is in my house, he is always checking our house for safety, and I really appreciate it.

The police here have the right to make sure your guns are stored safely, it is not like they do it all of the time. You just know that it could happen and you had better have them stored safely.

Soooo, your father in law comes over and checks for "safety"?

Why is that.....does he not trust that you are capable of handling it yourself?

I guess that's why you want armed government officials rummaging through your home to take care of what would be YOUR personal responsibility.

Too fuckin' funny!

 

[billyerock1991]

0 murders in Kennesaw Georgia I gave the stats in that link what are the city sizes and how many murders have they had in the past 25 years and do they have any laws that require it's citizens to have a firearm?

sorry pal your source is not a gubment source ... your source isn't based on murders rape and so on ... it's based on right wing liars ... try again

and ain't your pal bitch and you better re-read the source have any of those cities been murder free FOR THE PAST 25 YEARS with a law that requires it's citizen to have a firearm?

his Realtor, BS site yeah they're going to tell you how many murders have been comitted ...

Crime in Kennesaw by Year

http://www.city-data.com/crime/crime-Kennesaw-Georgia.html
once again the right wing nut case here is caught in a lie ... he said "no murders" it seems there been a few murders not to mention other crimes

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It shows your fail and that you are full of shit.

Check list you don't have a problem with a complete stranger doing a walk through of your home because he from the guberment, but when it comes too your mother in-law doing an inspection you object.

I never said that I had a problem with my mother in law. When my father in law is in my house, he is always checking our house for safety, and I really appreciate it.

The police here have the right to make sure your guns are stored safely, it is not like they do it all of the time. You just know that it could happen and you had better have them stored safely.

Soooo, your father in law comes over and checks for "safety"?

Why is that.....does he not trust that you are capable of handling it yourself?

I guess that's why you want armed government officials rummaging through your home to take care of what would be YOUR personal responsibility.

Too fuckin' funny!

You saw the point I was trying to make.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I agree this was a poor attempt on humor ... he must hate his mother in-law

But he luvs his guberment.

so you hate America ??? I guess you do ... by all of your unintelligent remarks here I was wondering ... when you go out side, when you come up from your mother in-laws basement where you live, right after your daddy in-law inspects it for you, do you look for the sky falling too ???? or do you get your daddy in-law to look for you first??? just to make sure its safe for ya????

The government is not America dumb ass.
And the rest of your bullshit is so ironically thick it isn't coherent

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I never said that I had a problem with my mother in law. When my father in law is in my house, he is always checking our house for safety, and I really appreciate it.

The police here have the right to make sure your guns are stored safely, it is not like they do it all of the time. You just know that it could happen and you had better have them stored safely.

The police don't have any rights other than obey the constitution. the end.

I accept your capitulation.

My surrender? I see you are running away and claiming victory.
The police only have one right and that is to obey the Constitution.

 

[NoNukes]

It shows your fail and that you are full of shit.

Check list you don't have a problem with a complete stranger doing a walk through of your home because he from the guberment, but when it comes too your mother in-law doing an inspection you object.

I never said that I had a problem with my mother in law. When my father in law is in my house, he is always checking our house for safety, and I really appreciate it.

The police here have the right to make sure your guns are stored safely, it is not like they do it all of the time. You just know that it could happen and you had better have them stored safely.

Soooo, your father in law comes over and checks for "safety"?

Why is that.....does he not trust that you are capable of handling it yourself?

I guess that's why you want armed government officials rummaging through your home to take care of what would be YOUR personal responsibility.

Too fuckin' funny!

My father in law was a builder and knows much more about safety. Not deferring to him would be rather stupid. No government official is going to be rummaging through my house. If I owned a gun, the police would have the right to make sure it is stored safely. I would have no problem with that. The gun owners that I know think that it is a good idea, we do not fear government tyranny.

 

[NoNukes]

The police don't have any rights other than obey the constitution. the end.

I accept your capitulation.

My surrender? I see you are running away and claiming victory.
The police only have one right and that is to obey the Constitution.

The Constitution was written hundreds of years ago. Laws need to change to fit the times.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

I accept your capitulation.

My surrender? I see you are running away and claiming victory.
The police only have one right and that is to obey the Constitution.

The Constitution was written hundreds of years ago. Laws need to change to fit the times.

OH so liberty has no meaning because it was a concept create thousands of years ago?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

i never said that i had a problem with my mother in law. When my father in law is in my house, he is always checking our house for safety, and i really appreciate it.

The police here have the right to make sure your guns are stored safely, it is not like they do it all of the time. You just know that it could happen and you had better have them stored safely.

soooo, your father in law comes over and checks for "safety"?

Why is that.....does he not trust that you are capable of handling it yourself?

I guess that's why you want armed government officials rummaging through your home to take care of what would be your personal responsibility.

Too fuckin' funny!

my father in law was a builder and knows much more about safety. Not deferring to him would be rather stupid. No government official is going to be rummaging through my house. If i owned a gun, the police would have the right to make sure it is stored safely. I would have no problem with that. The gun owners that i know think that it is a good idea, we do not fear government tyranny.

so you're saying you can't make it on your own, you must have someone watching over you?

 

[NoNukes]

soooo, your father in law comes over and checks for "safety"?

Why is that.....does he not trust that you are capable of handling it yourself?

I guess that's why you want armed government officials rummaging through your home to take care of what would be your personal responsibility.

Too fuckin' funny!

my father in law was a builder and knows much more about safety. Not deferring to him would be rather stupid. No government official is going to be rummaging through my house. If i owned a gun, the police would have the right to make sure it is stored safely. I would have no problem with that. The gun owners that i know think that it is a good idea, we do not fear government tyranny.

so you're saying you can't make it on your own, you must have someone watching over you?

That is how civilized countries work.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

my father in law was a builder and knows much more about safety. Not deferring to him would be rather stupid. No government official is going to be rummaging through my house. If i owned a gun, the police would have the right to make sure it is stored safely. I would have no problem with that. The gun owners that i know think that it is a good idea, we do not fear government tyranny.

so you're saying you can't make it on your own, you must have someone watching over you?

That is how civilized countries work.

No that's how a nazi country works

 

[billyerock1991]

I never said that I had a problem with my mother in law. When my father in law is in my house, he is always checking our house for safety, and I really appreciate it.

The police here have the right to make sure your guns are stored safely, it is not like they do it all of the time. You just know that it could happen and you had better have them stored safely.

Soooo, your father in law comes over and checks for "safety"?

Why is that.....does he not trust that you are capable of handling it yourself?

I guess that's why you want armed government officials rummaging through your home to take care of what would be YOUR personal responsibility.

Too fuckin' funny!

You saw the point I was trying to make.

is it the point on the top of your hat ??? where you sit in the corner ... thats spells the word

D
U
N
C
E

 

[Papawx3]

In Ireland the police are allowed to come to your house and check if you gun is stored safely according to regulations. The gun owners who I know think that it is a good idea.

FWIW, this isn't Ireland. The Irish are used to getting pushed around and told how to live by their gov't.
This is the US, and the people I know not only think this is a bad idea, they would tell the police to get the hell off their property.

 

[billyerock1991]

so you're saying you can't make it on your own, you must have someone watching over you?

That is how civilized countries work.

No that's how a nazi country works

really !!!!!​

The 1938 law signed by Hitler that LaPierre mentions in his book basically does the opposite of what he says it did. “The 1938 revisions completely deregulated the acquisition and transfer of rifles and shotguns, as well as ammunition,” Harcourt wrote. Meanwhile, many more categories of people, including Nazi party members, were exempted from gun ownership regulations altogether, while the legal age of purchase was lowered from 20 to 18, and permit lengths were extended from one year to three years.

The law did prohibit Jews and other persecuted classes from owning guns, but this should not be an indictment of gun control in general. Does the fact that Nazis forced Jews into horrendous ghettos indict urban planning? Should we eliminate all police officers because the Nazis used police officers to oppress and kill the Jews? What about public works — Hitler loved public works projects? Of course not. These are merely implements that can be used for good or ill, much as gun advocates like to argue about guns themselves. If guns don’t kill people, then neither does gun control cause genocide (genocidal regimes cause genocide).

Besides, Omer Bartov, a historian at Brown University who studies the Third Reich, notes that the Jews probably wouldn’t have had much success fighting back. “Just imagine the Jews of Germany exercising the right to bear arms and fighting the SA, SS and the Wehrmacht. The [Russian] Red Army lost 7 million men fighting the Wehrmacht, despite its tanks and planes and artillery. The Jews with pistols and shotguns would have done better?” he told Salon.

Proponents of the theory sometimes point to the 1943 Warsaw Ghetto Uprising as evidence that, as Fox News’ Judge Andrew Napolitano put it, “those able to hold onto their arms and their basic right to self-defense were much more successful in resisting the Nazi genocide.” But as the Tablet’s Michael Moynihan points out, Napolitano’s history (curiously based on a citation of work by French Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson) is a bit off. In reality, only about 20 Germans were killed, while some 13,000 Jews were massacred. The remaining 50,000 who survived were promptly sent off to concentration camps.

Robert Spitzer, a political scientist who studies gun politics and chairs the political science department at SUNY Cortland, told Mother Jones’ Gavin Aronsen that the prohibition on Jewish gun ownership was merely a symptom, not the problem itself. “[It] wasn’t the defining moment that marked the beginning of the end for Jewish people in Germany. It was because they were persecuted, were deprived of all of their rights, and they were a minority group,” he explained.

Meanwhile, much of the Hitler myth is based on an infamous quote falsely attributed to the Fuhrer, which extols the virtue of gun control:

This year will go down in history! For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!

The quote has been widely reproduced in blog posts and opinion columns about gun control, but it’s “probably a fraud and was likely never uttered,” according to Harcourt. “This quotation, often seen without any date or citation at all, suffers from several credibility problems, the most significant of which is that the date often given [1935] has no correlation with any legislative effort by the Nazis for gun registration, nor would there have been any need for the Nazis to pass such a law, since gun registration laws passed by the Weimar government were already in effect,” researchers at the useful website GunCite note.

“As for Stalin,” Bartov continued, “the very idea of either gun control or the freedom to bear arms would have been absurd to him. His regime used violence on a vast scale, provided arms to thugs of all descriptions, and stripped not guns but any human image from those it declared to be its enemies. And then, when it needed them, as in WWII, it took millions of men out of the Gulags, trained and armed them and sent them to fight Hitler, only to send back the few survivors into the camps if they uttered any criticism of the regime.”

Bartov added that this misreading of history is not only intellectually dishonest, but also dangerous. “I happen to have been a combat soldier and officer in the Israeli Defense Forces and I know what these assault rifles can do,” he said in an email.

He continued: “Their assertion that they need these guns to protect themselves from the government — as supposedly the Jews would have done against the Hitler regime — means not only that they are innocent of any knowledge and understanding of the past, but also that they are consciously or not imbued with the type of fascist or Bolshevik thinking that they can turn against a democratically elected government, indeed turn their guns on it, just because they don’t like its policies, its ideology, or the color, race and origin of its leaders.”