2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 112,174
- 52,417
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #21
I voted for the republicans last November. I am totally for gun control. After the abuses that lead to slaughter of 20 children in an elementary school we need to step back from the abyss and think this thru a little more. Those poor kids, are we supposed to arm preschoolers? Silly, It speaks more to the issue WE NEED gun control. As a Conservative Trump voter, I am GOOD with that.Book Burners burned books simply because they didn't like the books.....gun grabbers are the Book Burners of the gun world......they hate guns and will do anything they can to attack gun owners and their tools......
Here we have New York, at it again with another worthless gun control effort.....mandating trigger pull weight...to make guns less accurate when you need them for self defense...
NY Democrats Introduce Mandatory Trigger Pull Weight Bill - The Truth About Guns
and you are foolish......
Americans use guns to stop violent crime 1,500,000 times a year........20 children died, yet how many lives are saved with guns...out of that 1,500,000 times a year...
More Lives Are Saved by Defensive Gun Uses Than Taken by Criminal Gun Uses - The Truth About Guns
To figure out how many lives are saved by defensive gun uses, I turn once again to Kleck and Gertz’s article Armed Resistance to Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun. They found that 15.7 percent of people involved in a DGU believed that they “almost certainly” saved theirs or someone else’s life.
That might strike some people as an awfully large percentage. But if you take into account the fact that most locales regard the mere act of pulling a gun as deadly force, combined with the fact that most places require someone to be in “reasonable fear of imminent death or great bodily harm” before he or she can lawfully use deadly force, the number seems feasible.
In addition to the “almost certainly” pool, The K-G study also found that 14.6 percent of respondents believed that someone “probably would have” been killed if not for their DGU.
Because I want my numbers to be distinctly conservative let’s say that nine out of 10 of the “almost certainly” folks were wrong. And let’s say that 99 out of 100 of the “probably” people were also incorrect. That means we can state with a fair degree of certainty that at least 1.716 percentof the 1.46 million DGUs actually saved a life.
That translates to over 25,000 lives saved annually by guns.
According to the CDC, between 1999 and 2010 there were an average of 11,740 gun-related homicides annually. In 2014 the number was 10,945.
Bottom line: for every criminal firearm homicide (most of which consist of criminals shooing other criminals) more than two lives are saved by defensive gun uses.
Protection against government tyranny considerations aside, this is the human value of the Second Amendment.