RealDave
Gold Member
- Sep 28, 2016
- 26,521
- 3,565
The fact is that the first shooter fired several shots after being shot in the back. More people could have been killed where they may not have been shot by the original shooter.Aww Dave, you can lie about whatever you wish. But the fact that guy shot and killed a man and might certainly have killed others is a fact. no court will convict this hero, no matter how many children you attempt to bring into your pathetic attempt to protect a killer.Read the story, jackass.
There was no indication the man would have shot anyone else.
Your hero shot the back in the back & the guy then fired many other shots. Luckily, mote people were not killed.
Now, lets talk about all the innocent people killed by toters who were too stupid not to keep their guns away rom children.
Maybe that guy was hunting a POS who just raped his 10 year old daughter. He finds him in this bar & gets his justice. Then some asshole guns him down.
The point is the toter had no clue as to why he shot that man or what his intentions were with the rest of the people.