Gun owner, with concealed gun, shoots killer in a sports bar...where they serve alcohol...

[miketx]

Thanks for proving my point; you are against gun rights, cannot support the man who shot the murderer and you refuse to even consider the possibility that the man who shot the murderer may have prevented an even greater tragedy.

Please get back to me when you can prove, or even have evidence of, that the murderer was only going to commit one murder that night.

The first shooter may very well have put the gun down and waited for police to come. We'll never know. And you can't prove otherwise.

Yup... the guy who shot the perp should have waited until he killed more people.

WTF is it with people like you?

It's the pretend Wild West! S

It appears the anti-gun mob does, indeed, make assumptions about the behaviors of murderers when it suits their agenda.

Funny, but sad, that Mudda claims to support the Second Amendment, but won't even consider the positive aspects of a CCW citizen shooting a murderer before that murderer can commit further crimes.

Why didn't someone shoot the second shooter? He may have shot others himself.

Most likely, unlike you, they understood the difference between a cold-blooded murderer and a person defending them from a cold-blooded murderer.

Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

I already told your lying hide what he did to make someone think he would shoot other people.

Which was nothing, now move along.

I already told your lying hide what the motivation was.

 

[miketx]

Thanks for proving my point; you are against gun rights, cannot support the man who shot the murderer and you refuse to even consider the possibility that the man who shot the murderer may have prevented an even greater tragedy.

Please get back to me when you can prove, or even have evidence of, that the murderer was only going to commit one murder that night.

The first shooter may very well have put the gun down and waited for police to come. We'll never know. And you can't prove otherwise.

Yup... the guy who shot the perp should have waited until he killed more people.

WTF is it with people like you?

It's the pretend Wild West! S

It appears the anti-gun mob does, indeed, make assumptions about the behaviors of murderers when it suits their agenda.

Funny, but sad, that Mudda claims to support the Second Amendment, but won't even consider the positive aspects of a CCW citizen shooting a murderer before that murderer can commit further crimes.

Why didn't someone shoot the second shooter? He may have shot others himself.

Most likely, unlike you, they understood the difference between a cold-blooded murderer and a person defending them from a cold-blooded murderer.

Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

Try selling that BS to the people who were there. lol

The other people are just happy to come home alive ANY time they go out. That's how bad things are these days in the US.

Bigger lie than you have told today.

 

[Mudda]

The first shooter may very well have put the gun down and waited for police to come. We'll never know. And you can't prove otherwise.

Yup... the guy who shot the perp should have waited until he killed more people.

WTF is it with people like you?

It's the pretend Wild West! S

Why didn't someone shoot the second shooter? He may have shot others himself.

Most likely, unlike you, they understood the difference between a cold-blooded murderer and a person defending them from a cold-blooded murderer.

Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

I already told your lying hide what he did to make someone think he would shoot other people.

Which was nothing, now move along.

I already told your lying hide what the motivation was.

He saw someone shoot. So that green lighted him to shoot also.

 

[Mudda]

The first shooter may very well have put the gun down and waited for police to come. We'll never know. And you can't prove otherwise.

Yup... the guy who shot the perp should have waited until he killed more people.

WTF is it with people like you?

It's the pretend Wild West! S

Why didn't someone shoot the second shooter? He may have shot others himself.

Most likely, unlike you, they understood the difference between a cold-blooded murderer and a person defending them from a cold-blooded murderer.

Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

Try selling that BS to the people who were there. lol

The other people are just happy to come home alive ANY time they go out. That's how bad things are these days in the US.

Bigger lie than you have told today.

You can't handle the truth, princess.

 

[2aguy]

To an idiot lib like mudda, the fact he shot one doesn't mean he would shoot two. If he shot two it doesn't mean he would shoot three. If he shot three it doesn't mean he would shoot four. Etc, etc, etc. This type of idiot will always defend the perp and denigrate the hero. I think it makes them feel better about their insignificant lives.

The original shooter had a beef with one guy, nothing suggests that he would shoot anyone else, that's all a fantasy you've made up for yourself that is based solely on your imagination.

How do you know? Do you have a link proving your assertion that the shooter only had a beef with the manager and wasn't going to shoot anyone else?

Why are you defending the shooter from being shot by another person?

He's a lib that's why. They love criminals.

Libs love criminals? Wrong. It`s people like you that want them to have guns along with the mentally ill and terror suspects. Good job! You assholes must really hate this country.

Moron......show us where anyone wants violent felons or the dangerously mentally ill to have guns...please...we are waiting.

What we know......you guys fight long prison sentences for actual gun criminals...you know, criminals who actually use guns to commit crimes, and you support every law that makes it tougher for normal people to own and carry guns......

Here....as to terror suspects...or those who are put on a list by nameless, faceless bureaucrats ...here is Trey Gowdy asking which other Rights assholes like you want stripped from people without due process....

 

[2aguy]

Yup... the guy who shot the perp should have waited until he killed more people.

WTF is it with people like you?

It's the pretend Wild West! S

Most likely, unlike you, they understood the difference between a cold-blooded murderer and a person defending them from a cold-blooded murderer.

Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

I already told your lying hide what he did to make someone think he would shoot other people.

Which was nothing, now move along.

I already told your lying hide what the motivation was.

He saw someone shoot. So that green lighted him to shoot also.

No....he and other witnesses saw him shoot an unarmed man, the manager of the sports bar......that is a crime.....and that sort of erratic behavior tends to make normal people suspicious of your next actions....

 

[miketx]

The nra pushed a mandatory 5 years in prison if you use a gun to commit a crime. Guess who killed? Douches libs, that's who,

 

[2aguy]

To an idiot lib like mudda, the fact he shot one doesn't mean he would shoot two. If he shot two it doesn't mean he would shoot three. If he shot three it doesn't mean he would shoot four. Etc, etc, etc. This type of idiot will always defend the perp and denigrate the hero. I think it makes them feel better about their insignificant lives.

The original shooter had a beef with one guy, nothing suggests that he would shoot anyone else, that's all a fantasy you've made up for yourself that is based solely on your imagination.

How do you know? Do you have a link proving your assertion that the shooter only had a beef with the manager and wasn't going to shoot anyone else?

Why are you defending the shooter from being shot by another person?

He's a lib that's why. They love criminals.

Libertarian.

How can you be a Libertarian if you are for big government controlling guns and denying citizens their right to have them?

Why are you so defensive of the man who committed murder, yet attack the man who stopped him?

That one is easy....like left wingers all over the world...he is insane......functionally insane, but insane none the less....

 

[2aguy]

Hmmm...I wonder if the guy who saved the day in this sports bar woke up that morning thinking he would need his gun? I wonder if he is glad he put that gun on and carried it with him? Do you think he did so in fear, or in preperation for the odd chance some nut would walk into a sports bar and shoot an employee in front of him....?

Police: Concealed Carry Permit Holder Shoots, Kills 'Active Shooter' - Breitbart

On Wednesday night a concealed carry permit holder shot and killed an alleged “active shooter” at Zona Caliente Sports Bar in Arlington, Texas.
The incident occurred around 6:15 pm. WFAA reported, “A man opened fire at the Zona Caliente Sports Bar… but police say a customer with a gun of his own put a stop to it.”

The man reported to police as an “active shooter” was 48-year-old James Jones. He allegedly walked into Zona Caliente, began arguing with the manager — 37-year-old Cesar Perez — and then pulled out a gun and killed Perez. At that moment a concealed carry permit holder responded by pulling his own gun and killing Jones.

The unidentified permit holder had to come down from “the other end of the bar” to intervene and stop Jones. Arlington Police Department Lt. Christopher Cook said, “[The concealed permit holder] made the decision to engage the shooter, fearing there would be other loss of life.”

Police do not yet have a motive in the shooting of Perez, but they have made clear that the concealed permit holder will face no charges for the actions he took to be sure no other innocents were harmed.


So....concealed carrier stops a killer.....

they are in a sports bar where alcohol is served....

anti gun myth, after anti gun myth just goes away...

He "saved the day"? The manager was shot dead, so whose day did he save?

so tell me how you know the piece of shit murderer would have stopped after just shooting one person?

He had a beef with one guy whom he shot. Nothing in the story suggests that he would have gone on a rampage.

You have no idea why he shot the manager...since it doesn't seem as if they knew one another....

 

[tycho1572]

Yup... the guy who shot the perp should have waited until he killed more people.

WTF is it with people like you?

It's the pretend Wild West! S

Most likely, unlike you, they understood the difference between a cold-blooded murderer and a person defending them from a cold-blooded murderer.

Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

I already told your lying hide what he did to make someone think he would shoot other people.

Which was nothing, now move along.

I already told your lying hide what the motivation was.

He saw someone shoot. So that green lighted him to shoot also.

Life can sometimes be scary, cupcake.

 

[2aguy]

We have reached the point where mudda is simply a Troll...

 

[2aguy]

mudda...are you the poster Brain357 under a different name?...this is the same silly crap he would post.

 

[Divine Wind]

How can you be a Libertarian if you are for big government controlling guns and denying citizens their right to have them?

Why are you so defensive of the man who committed murder, yet attack the man who stopped him?

First of all, you failed to show that I am against gun ownership, because I'm not.
Secondly, "yet attack the man who stopped him". Nobody was stopped, the first guy was shot after he had already killed his intended victim.
You must be living in a dream world.

Thanks for proving my point; you are against gun rights, cannot support the man who shot the murderer and you refuse to even consider the possibility that the man who shot the murderer may have prevented an even greater tragedy.

Please get back to me when you can prove, or even have evidence of, that the murderer was only going to commit one murder that night.

The first shooter may very well have put the gun down and waited for police to come. We'll never know. And you can't prove otherwise.

Yup... the guy who shot the perp should have waited until he killed more people.

WTF is it with people like you?

It's the pretend Wild West! S

The police said that they didn't know why the first shooter fired on the manager. Not everyone who kills someone is a mass murderer. Please try again.

and you don't make assumptions as to the behavior of a murderer

It appears the anti-gun mob does, indeed, make assumptions about the behaviors of murderers when it suits their agenda.

Funny, but sad, that Mudda claims to support the Second Amendment, but won't even consider the positive aspects of a CCW citizen shooting a murderer before that murderer can commit further crimes.

Why didn't someone shoot the second shooter? He may have shot others himself.

Most likely, unlike you, they understood the difference between a cold-blooded murderer and a person defending them from a cold-blooded murderer.

Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

Wild West? Another excellent example of a Straw Man argument from the anti-gun Left. Thanks for providing more evidence that you are anti-gun.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Nothing suggests that he was going to kill anyone else, he had a beef with the manager, that's it. The second shooter was trigger happy and maybe the first shooter killed a pedophile who raped his daughter, so it would have been a righteous killing.

The fact that he just shot someone suggests it, idiot.

The police said that they didn't know why the first shooter fired on the manager. Not everyone who kills someone is a mass murderer. Please try again.

and you don't make assumptions as to the behavior of a murderer

It appears the anti-gun mob does, indeed, make assumptions about the behaviors of murderers when it suits their agenda.

Funny, but sad, that Mudda claims to support the Second Amendment, but won't even consider the positive aspects of a CCW citizen shooting a murderer before that murderer can commit further crimes.

Why didn't someone shoot the second shooter? He may have shot others himself.

really?

a guy draws after a piece of shit kills a man in cold blood and you think he's the murderer

 

[Skull Pilot]

Considering the killer with the gun was in a room filled with innocent people, and he had just killed another human being...how about the rest of the people in the sports bar....

Are you normally this slow?

Nothing suggests that he was going to kill anyone else, he had a beef with the manager, that's it. The second shooter was trigger happy and maybe the first shooter killed a pedophile who raped his daughter, so it would have been a righteous killing.

since when is it righteous to shoot an unarmed man?

If someone raped his daughter, (or even killed her) maybe he felt justified. I know I wouldn't care if the s.o.b. was armed or not.

so you are OK with shooting an unarmed man

no wonder you feel sad that this piece of shit murderer is dead

Ok , then I'd throw a gun at my daughter's rapist and then shoot him. Happy?

no you'd assume the piece of shit who shot your wife in cold blood wouldn't shoot anyone else because there was nothing to indicate he would
then you would stand there and let him rape your daughter because there is nothing to indicate he will rape anyone else

 

[Skull Pilot]

Hmmm...I wonder if the guy who saved the day in this sports bar woke up that morning thinking he would need his gun? I wonder if he is glad he put that gun on and carried it with him? Do you think he did so in fear, or in preperation for the odd chance some nut would walk into a sports bar and shoot an employee in front of him....?

Police: Concealed Carry Permit Holder Shoots, Kills 'Active Shooter' - Breitbart

On Wednesday night a concealed carry permit holder shot and killed an alleged “active shooter” at Zona Caliente Sports Bar in Arlington, Texas.
The incident occurred around 6:15 pm. WFAA reported, “A man opened fire at the Zona Caliente Sports Bar… but police say a customer with a gun of his own put a stop to it.”

The man reported to police as an “active shooter” was 48-year-old James Jones. He allegedly walked into Zona Caliente, began arguing with the manager — 37-year-old Cesar Perez — and then pulled out a gun and killed Perez. At that moment a concealed carry permit holder responded by pulling his own gun and killing Jones.

The unidentified permit holder had to come down from “the other end of the bar” to intervene and stop Jones. Arlington Police Department Lt. Christopher Cook said, “[The concealed permit holder] made the decision to engage the shooter, fearing there would be other loss of life.”

Police do not yet have a motive in the shooting of Perez, but they have made clear that the concealed permit holder will face no charges for the actions he took to be sure no other innocents were harmed.


So....concealed carrier stops a killer.....

they are in a sports bar where alcohol is served....

anti gun myth, after anti gun myth just goes away...

He "saved the day"? The manager was shot dead, so whose day did he save?

so tell me how you know the piece of shit murderer would have stopped after just shooting one person?

He had a beef with one guy whom he shot. Nothing in the story suggests that he would have gone on a rampage.

and you don't know if he would have shot anyone else when trying to run from the scene of the murder

you can't see the future can you?

He may have put the gun down and waited for police.

yeah you can bet your own life in that scenario

 

[Skull Pilot]

How can you be a Libertarian if you are for big government controlling guns and denying citizens their right to have them?

Why are you so defensive of the man who committed murder, yet attack the man who stopped him?

First of all, you failed to show that I am against gun ownership, because I'm not.
Secondly, "yet attack the man who stopped him". Nobody was stopped, the first guy was shot after he had already killed his intended victim.
You must be living in a dream world.

Thanks for proving my point; you are against gun rights, cannot support the man who shot the murderer and you refuse to even consider the possibility that the man who shot the murderer may have prevented an even greater tragedy.

Please get back to me when you can prove, or even have evidence of, that the murderer was only going to commit one murder that night.

The first shooter may very well have put the gun down and waited for police to come. We'll never know. And you can't prove otherwise.

Yup... the guy who shot the perp should have waited until he killed more people.

WTF is it with people like you?

It's the pretend Wild West! S

The police said that they didn't know why the first shooter fired on the manager. Not everyone who kills someone is a mass murderer. Please try again.

and you don't make assumptions as to the behavior of a murderer

It appears the anti-gun mob does, indeed, make assumptions about the behaviors of murderers when it suits their agenda.

Funny, but sad, that Mudda claims to support the Second Amendment, but won't even consider the positive aspects of a CCW citizen shooting a murderer before that murderer can commit further crimes.

Why didn't someone shoot the second shooter? He may have shot others himself.

Most likely, unlike you, they understood the difference between a cold-blooded murderer and a person defending them from a cold-blooded murderer.

Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

the wild west wasn't very wild that's just another myth you seem to believe

 

[Divine Wind]

He "saved the day"? The manager was shot dead, so whose day did he save?

so tell me how you know the piece of shit murderer would have stopped after just shooting one person?

He had a beef with one guy whom he shot. Nothing in the story suggests that he would have gone on a rampage.

and you don't know if he would have shot anyone else when trying to run from the scene of the murder

you can't see the future can you?

He may have put the gun down and waited for police.

yeah you can bet your own life in that scenario

He wouldn't. He'd more likely head for the ladies room to hide.

 

[Preacher]

Notice how democrats/liberals are ONLY in favor of CHOICE when it comes to a woman murdering her baby? Interesting.

 

[RealDave]

It's the pretend Wild West! S
Still, nothing in what the first shooter did could have led anyone to believe that he was going to shoot anyone else. Like, ok, I'm not crying because the first shooter got shot, I'm just pointing out that nothing would have led me to believe that he was going to shoot me or anyone else in that bar, that's simply absurd. But I do see where you guys are all fraidy cats and would be shitting your pants, so you'd fire. Then you change your undies. Maybe.

I already told your lying hide what he did to make someone think he would shoot other people.

Which was nothing, now move along.

I already told your lying hide what the motivation was.

He saw someone shoot. So that green lighted him to shoot also.

No....he and other witnesses saw him shoot an unarmed man, the manager of the sports bar......that is a crime.....and that sort of erratic behavior tends to make normal people suspicious of your next actions....

We've seen cops shoot unarmed people & you tell us that is not a crime.