Nosmo King
Gold Member
So currently peroxide is as big a problem as gun violence? Just another rationalization.So gun control doesn't work. Back ground checks aren't a panacea and not 100% effective so why bother. Gun lovers would tell us that each and every weapon in the American military arsenal should be on American streets in the hands of whoever has the means to obtain them. The rights of the mentally frazzled must not be infringed if they too want to own a weapon. In fact, gun lovers tell us that there is no such thing as an assault weapon, mass shootings produce as many victims as peanut allergies and choking incidents. As the second amendment must be followed (with that pesky exception of well regulated militias) to the letter, our current situation cannot be changed at all.I'm not nearly as interested in a victory as I am an understanding.
The facts are on the side of the Second Amendment defenders.
But we WANT to reduce homicides as much as the gun grabbers.
I would compromise with gun grabbers if I thought they were sincere.
But the fact is that gun grabbers will never feel safe until all guns are gone.
Look at this latest mass shooting.
The guy used a shotgun no different than millions of legally owned firearms that hunters use.
A five round tubular magazine is standard.
I've asked this 1000 times.
WHAT GUN CONTROL WOULD HAVE PREVENTED THIS SHOOTING?
Tell me.
Where are the suggestions from gun lovers to cut the rate of violence? All I hear is a bunch of lop-sided rationalizations from folks blinded by the glamor and lust for guns.
The only answer to your question is total gun control. That might have prevented this.
Nevertheless, It wouldn't have prevented someone like me who knows chemistry from binding together some legally purchased acetone peroxide and blowing the place to pieces.