DukeU
Diamond Member
- Jan 20, 2020
- 9,830
- 10,743
Actually you should say they haven't relased all the Jan 6th tapes "publicly"
LOL
Is it a privacy issue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually you should say they haven't relased all the Jan 6th tapes "publicly"
Trump has a copy of the video.
Why doesn't Trump release it?
Yes a crime was committed in a persons home. It is not SOP to release video footage of that crime to the public unless the victim wants to. That would be a tremendous violation of privacy if the cops did that. Rather absurd that you think it means something if they don’t release video footageSame reason ANY video is released, transparency.
A crime was allegedly committed, right?
Trump could release videos if he wanted. It’s his property. Wildly inappropriate for the FBI to do that.They haven't released the Trump Mar-a-lago security tapes, showing his people moving boxes of classified material in and out of the storage room.
why would they release videos on Trump? WTF, thought no one was above the law? where'd that go?Again, why in the world would they release these videos to the public. I answered your question, now you answer mine
bull fking shit. We saw video in front of Mar-a-lago? Documents pulled? WTF again, who is above the law? pelosers?Yes a crime was committed in a persons home. It is not SOP to release video footage of that crime to the public unless the victim wants to. That would be a tremendous violation of privacy if the cops did that. Rather absurd that you think it means something if they don’t release video footage
Yes a crime was committed in a persons home. It is not SOP to release video footage of that crime to the public unless the victim wants to. That would be a tremendous violation of privacy if the cops did that. Rather absurd that you think it means something if they don’t release video footage
well I heard the dispatchers audio and they used the word Friend in the home.Even more absurd, all the differing stories that have been reported in this case.
we saw video already. FBI had it.Trump could release videos if he wanted. It’s his property. Wildly inappropriate for the FBI to do that.
You mean conspiracy kooks?! You really think the propaganda people like you spread makes any sort of an impact?! Come on get real.Even more absurd, all the differing stories that have been reported in this case.
we know this right now. no conspiracyYou mean conspiracy kooks?! You really think the propaganda people like you spread makes any sort of an impact?! Come on get real.
People like you creating ridiculous narratives doesn’t justify the government violating citizens privacy rights. Unless charges are contested in court those videos will remain private. Rightly so
Last time she saw him was 7 years ago."Oxane “Gypsy” Taub is the former “life partner” of David DePape, and she has now destroyed the Leftist media narrative, confirming that DePape is no MAGA Republican, but a Leftist who even supported Nancy Pelosi."
Taub on David DePape:
“He is mentally ill. He has been mentally ill for a long time. He came back in very bad shape. He thought he was Jesus. He was constantly paranoid, thinking people were after him. And it took a good year or two to get back to, you know, being halfway normal.” If he ever did.
Well when I met him, he was only 20 years old, and he didn’t have any experience in politics, and he was very much in alignment with my views and I’ve always been very progressive. I absolutely admire Nancy Pelosi.”
All lieswe know this right now. no conspiracy
Again, facts in evidence as of today:
1. glass broken out not in at the back door
2. third person answered the door to let cops in
3. Peloser was allowed to use the bathroom
4. nothing happened until the cops came in
5. both in their underwear.
6. Police Dispatch signaled out the dude was a friend
7. No 911 audio!!!
Why was it reported?All lies
Not one thing is logical in thisLast time she saw him was 7 years ago.
Holy fuck Slade. FOR THE THRID TIME, I AM NOT TALKING ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN YOUR TWO STATMENTS.The symmetry breaker was pretty obvious. One was based on substance and the other based on an outright lie
That is not a fact. It is your asinine assertion based on a 100 yard photo when you have no idea what it looks like when someone breaks a window. I have demoed enough buildings to know your assertions is just basic bullshit. I have no idea what direction the glass was broken into but even if it was broken outward it would not indicate Paul's sexual preference. Windows or glass, surprisingly, do not have any connection with sexual preference.dude, seriously? the supposed burglar, that wanted to murder the old man, just let him use the bathroom? And you think we're odd. too fking funny.
Again, facts in evidence as of today:
1. glass broken out not in at the back door
Irrelevant. A third person or a hundred people do not tell you anything about his sexual preference. You know, what my post actually addressed.2. third peron answered the door to let cops in
Irrelevant. Gay, straight and bisexual people use the bathroom. Funny that you think using the bathroom is a fact that shows his sexual preference.3. Peloser was allowed to use the bathroom
Holy shit, more irrelevant bloviating. Now when the cops entered the house has an impact on sexual preference.4. nothing happened until the cops came in
FINALLY. Something pertinent. Oh wait.....5. both in their underwear.
And yet the police say that was a flat out falsehood:6. Police Dispatch signaled out the dude was a friend
You are a cuke, an excellent analogy to your depth of thought though I would not have thought of it. You make a good cucumber.7. No 911 audio!!!
But you think we're the cukes!
Idiots will always deny facts and march to ignorance.The media reporting is falling apart. people on both sides are not buying the official story. Don't be mad at the posters here just because we're not stroking your virtue signalling.
I heard the dispatch audio. Facts. You are a foolAnd yet the police say that was a flat out falsehood