progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,638
- 38,405
or it could be they can see the evidence and not dismiss it with dem propaganda,,,
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harvard law professor: Twitter cannot violate the First Amendment
- Thread starter pyetro
- Start date
- Jan 15, 2009
- 65,677
- 40,932
Faun let's be honest, even a broken clock is right twice a day, but it's still a broken clock.I only needed one to prove you wrong.you gave me one while there are tens of thousands on the other side,,,Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...campusunmasked.com
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
"its only enforced against one political side,,," ~ a pouting retard
No, shvantz, it's not enforced against only one political side.
meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,909
- 18,114
Your clock is right as often as republican "alternative facts"Faun let's be honest, even a broken clock is right twice a day, but it's still a broken clock.
- Jan 15, 2009
- 65,677
- 40,932
Wow! Spoken like a true leftwinger.You have a fight between the truthers, and the propagandists. One side wants lies removed from the platforms, the other wants to be able to spread lies without being challenged.“Democrats often say that we don’t remove enough content, and Republicans often say we remove too much,” Zuckerberg said in his opening remarks. “The fact that both sides criticize us doesn’t mean that we’re getting this right, but it does mean there are real disagreements about where the limits of online speech should be.”
Something is broke and needs to get fixed. These media giants are wielding way too much power, and proved it with all the
right wing censoring prior to the election. Their is a fix, but it takes a government that isn't corrupt.
I don't think our government will fix it.
One side wants "alternative facts" while the other wants only real facts. That's because the different ideologies requite different information to influence the electorate.
What I hear is you saying that everything from the right is "alternative facts" and the lies from the left are the "real facts".
See, here is the issue, dude...It's called freedom of speech, and YOU and your ilk don't get to decide.
Nor do I and my ilk decide. Do you not see the direction our country is going with it? It's concerning, or should be concerning to all.
- Jan 15, 2009
- 65,677
- 40,932
You are an idiot. I see that it went above your single digit IQ. Sorry, have Aunt Mabelle explain it to you.Your clock is right as often as republican "alternative facts"Faun let's be honest, even a broken clock is right twice a day, but it's still a broken clock.
meaner gene
Diamond Member
- Feb 11, 2017
- 21,909
- 18,114
Not at all. I think all "facts" should be fact checked before being allowed to be repeated and amplified by social media.Wow! Spoken like a true leftwinger.
What I hear is you saying that everything from the right is "alternative facts" and the lies from the left are the "real facts".
Take the claim of millions of illegal aliens voting in 2016.
pyetro
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2019
- 5,538
- 5,755
- Thread starter
- #267
It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.
Did you educate the Trump supporter who said in this thread that what Twitter did was "obviously illegal"? Here's the link so you can school him:It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.
Harvard law professor: Twitter cannot violate the First Amendment | Page 10 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
theHawk
Registered Conservative
- Sep 20, 2005
- 53,725
- 55,713
It’s possible it could be illegal for other statues and laws on the books. There are many anti-discrimination laws for example.It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.Did you educate the Trump supporter who said in this thread that what Twitter did was "obviously illegal"? Here's the link so you can school him:It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.
Harvard law professor: Twitter cannot violate the First Amendment | Page 10 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
You're missing the point of the complaints about Facebook and Twitter. Trumpsters are simply butthurt because those companies won't propagate their bullshit. The nonsense about "freedom of speech" and "section 230" is just excuse making.
BoSoxGal
Gold Member
- Jul 1, 2014
- 1,047
- 499
Political ideology is NOT a protected class under our constitution.It’s possible it could be illegal for other statues and laws on the books. There are many anti-discrimination laws for example.It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.Did you educate the Trump supporter who said in this thread that what Twitter did was "obviously illegal"? Here's the link so you can school him:It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.
Harvard law professor: Twitter cannot violate the First Amendment | Page 10 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
the issue with twiiter is they dont apply their rules equally and base it on political leanings favoring one side over the other,,
And they don't have to. That's actual freedom of speech.
theHawk
Registered Conservative
- Sep 20, 2005
- 53,725
- 55,713
That’s good to know. We can now hire and fire people based on their political affiliations.Political ideology is NOT a protected class under our constitution.It’s possible it could be illegal for other statues and laws on the books. There are many anti-discrimination laws for example.It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.Did you educate the Trump supporter who said in this thread that what Twitter did was "obviously illegal"? Here's the link so you can school him:It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.
Harvard law professor: Twitter cannot violate the First Amendment | Page 10 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Chinese “social score” here we come.
Protected class legislation is bullshit. It's what leads idiots to assume Twitter can't discriminate against Trumpsters.Political ideology is NOT a protected class under our constitution.It’s possible it could be illegal for other statues and laws on the books. There are many anti-discrimination laws for example.It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.Did you educate the Trump supporter who said in this thread that what Twitter did was "obviously illegal"? Here's the link so you can school him:It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.
Harvard law professor: Twitter cannot violate the First Amendment | Page 10 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
That’s good to know. We can now hire and fire people based on their political affiliations.Political ideology is NOT a protected class under our constitution.
Chinese “social score” here we come.
The Chinese "social score" is a government imposed program. Idiots and socialists can't tell the difference between government and private enterprise. Which are you?
Last edited:
theHawk
Registered Conservative
- Sep 20, 2005
- 53,725
- 55,713
That’s good to know. We can now hire and fire people based on their political affiliations.Political ideology is NOT a protected class under our constitution.It’s possible it could be illegal for other statues and laws on the books. There are many anti-discrimination laws for example.It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.Did you educate the Trump supporter who said in this thread that what Twitter did was "obviously illegal"? Here's the link so you can school him:It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.
Harvard law professor: Twitter cannot violate the First Amendment | Page 10 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Chinese “social score” here we come.
Nope. You're an idiot. The Chinese "social score" crap is a government imposed program. Idiot and socialists can't tell the difference between government and private enterprise. Which are you?
Do you think the private companies and citizens are allowed to criticize Xi or their government? No, and that is also enforced by the companies themselves.
Fascism and restrictions on freedoms affect people no matter if it is the government or companies enforcing it on them. It certainly makes a fascist regime’s job easier if corporate stooges do the work for them.
pyetro
Diamond Member
- Jul 21, 2019
- 5,538
- 5,755
- Thread starter
- #276
Twitter allows anyone to criticize Obama, for instance.That’s good to know. We can now hire and fire people based on their political affiliations.Political ideology is NOT a protected class under our constitution.It’s possible it could be illegal for other statues and laws on the books. There are many anti-discrimination laws for example.It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.Did you educate the Trump supporter who said in this thread that what Twitter did was "obviously illegal"? Here's the link so you can school him:It’s not about it be legal or not. It’s about them silencing free speech and being a bunch of fascists.Besides, if Twitter wanted to be one-sided, it wouldn't be illegal. Private companies don't have to be "fair and balanced".Anyone with a functioning brain who reads my post will believe me. You idiotically claimed Twitter only enforces their rules "against one political side." I posted an Antifa group that was banned. That proves you wrong. It's not my problem that rendered you pouting like a 4 year old girl.you sound desperate for people to believe you,,,LOLyou didnt prove anything,,LOLyou do know I am giving you the benefit of the doubt when I call you a liar dont you???If l looked, i could find more, but I didn't need to to prove your idiotic claim that Twitter only does this to "one political side."OMG!!! they did one group,,,I didn't lie just because you're an ignorant buffoon. Here's Twitter banning an Antifa group because they used Twitter to incite violence...but its only enforced against one political side,,,True, it applies to all Twitter members who do what Trump did. Same as this forum.liar,,, this goes far beyond just trump,,That is exactly why they banned him.thats not the issue,,,Nutcase, Twitter banned Impeached Trump to prevent him from further incitement of violence.yes they do,, but thats not what twitter is doing and you know it,,You're a moron. This site bans members and deletes posts for rules violations just as Twitter does.no they dont so stop lying,,,This forum does the same. That would mean this forum is fascist, according to you. Why do you participate in what you believe is a fascist site?Yes, they have the legal right. It just shows what fascists they are.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
and you playing word games to fit your false narrative is the same as lying,,, so stop lying,,,
but you knew that and why you lied,,
Twitter Bans Antifa Student Group
The Revolutionary Student Front is an Antifa student group at the University of Texas at Austin that thinks “bricks belong best thrown at pig heads” and yet also hosts “self-defense” classes. The group boasted a little over 2,000 Twitter followers until getting suspended, apparently for no...
what about th other hundreds if not thousands of other accounts??
the only other option is an ignorant fool and useful idiot,,,
I'm ignorant or a liar for proving you wrong?
That's an interesting approach.
You keep telling yourself that, shvantz. Whatever makes you feel better about being proven wrong.
There's no law against bias in banning.
Harvard law professor: Twitter cannot violate the First Amendment | Page 10 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
Chinese “social score” here we come.
Nope. You're an idiot. The Chinese "social score" crap is a government imposed program. Idiot and socialists can't tell the difference between government and private enterprise. Which are you?
Do you think the private companies and citizens are allowed to criticize Xi or their government? No, and that is also enforced by the companies themselves.
Fascism and restrictions on freedoms affect people no matter if it is the government or companies enforcing it on them. It certainly makes a fascist regime’s job easier if corporate stooges do the work for them.
Fascism and restrictions on freedoms affect people no matter if it is the government or companies enforcing it on them. It certainly makes a fascist regime’s job easier if corporate stooges do the work for them.
Non-governmental entities can't "enforce" anything. That's the primary difference between government and private business. Conservatives and libertarians understand this. Socialists and Trumpsters do not.
- Jan 15, 2009
- 65,677
- 40,932
Trouble is, they want it both ways. One, or the other, but not both.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
You're missing the point of the complaints about Facebook and Twitter. Trumpsters are simply butthurt because those companies won't propagate their bullshit. The nonsense about "freedom of speech" and "section 230" is just excuse making.
Your post sounds like you don't understand, but cool lash out, bro.
I'm sure you don't mind censoring the other side....but.....
Trouble is, they want it both ways. One, or the other, but not both.A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
You're missing the point of the complaints about Facebook and Twitter. Trumpsters are simply butthurt because those companies won't propagate their bullshit. The nonsense about "freedom of speech" and "section 230" is just excuse making.
Your post sounds like you don't understand, but cool lash out, bro.
I'm sure you don't mind censoring the other side....but.....
I understand fine. Both sides are full of unprincipled douchebags who just want to use to use government to get one over on people they don't like.
Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,660
- 15,671
its right there in my comment,, not my fault you cant read simple english,,What the fuck are you even trying to whine about in the first place? What is your point?where did I say the government should do anything???Lol for fuck sake. You can have that opinion, but to suggest the GOVERNMENT should prohibit companies from operating in this way makes you sound like a complete dumbass.its more about free speech than the 1st amendment,, most people dont know the difference,,,A basic lesson about free speech from Laurence Tribe:
[/URL]To begin with, the First Amendment applies to the government — not to private actors like Twitter. So, when the company adds warnings to tweets or even — going a step further for users other than Trump — removes tweets, it can’t possibly violate the First Amendment, because it simply isn’t a governmental entity. You can love or hate how Twitter is regulating its own private platform — but you can’t call it a First Amendment violation.
the issue with twiiter is they dont apply their rules equally and base it on political leanings favoring one side over the other,,
Twitter is not just a private company, but a front end for the public Internet, which demands fair use under FCC laws.
So it is illegal for Twitter to use apply a personal political bias.
It is a private company. You can buy shares of it and everything.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 122
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 956
- Replies
- 54
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 6
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 9K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 277
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 79
- Views
- 261
- Replies
- 476
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 180
- Views
- 906
- Replies
- 64
- Views
- 371
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8505
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 483
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-