Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Read her article and the OP , misses her overall point. She is basically saying not all opinions should be seen as a legit opinion.
Example. Obama not beimg a natural born citizen should not be respected with a dignified answer which would give said question an air of legitimacy.
Her point is correct, but she may be pushing it a little to far. Id need to read more opinions from her to get a good overall perspective.
Naturally the OP didnt understand her point and the dailycaller failed again.
Based on that definition, all opinions are "legit". Her main problem appears to be with opinions with which she disagrees. If she doesn't agree and views another's opinion as unworthy of response, then she should not respond. Her opinion certainly does not warrant the wholesale ban on opinions expressing an opposing view.a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge
Blah blah blah blah fucking blah.WMD in Iraq?
The Clinton Administration believed there were, as did Hillary Clinton Reid Pelosi and a slew of Democratic Congresspersons and Senators. As did Britain, Germany, France, China and Russia. Further there is now evidence that as noted the stockpile was moved from Iraq to Syria. Further we have the records of the Fallen Government which proves that Saddam Hussein maintained the Nuclear team to return to Nuclear research as soon as the sanctions were lifted, that he maintained dual use facilities to return to production of chemical and biological agents as soon as the sanctions were lifted and that he maintained samples of said things for rapid production when sanctions were lifted.
No WMD in Iraq. Fuck you and your war.
Read her article and the OP , misses her overall point. She is basically saying not all opinions should be seen as a legit opinion.
Example. Obama not beimg a natural born citizen should not be respected with a dignified answer which would give said question an air of legitimacy.
Her point is correct, but she may be pushing it a little to far. Id need to read more opinions from her to get a good overall perspective.
Naturally the OP didnt understand her point and the dailycaller failed again.
Instead, I would like to propose a more rigorous standard: one of academic justice. When an academic community observes research promoting or justifying oppression, it should ensure that this research does not continue.
The Doctrine of Academic Freedom | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson
^^^^^^^^^^The big nose, bushy curly hair, and Ivy league scum bag liberal...oh and the typical large dark rimmed studious glasses, with that obnoxious know it all, arrogant face.
Harvard writer: Free speech threatens liberalism and must be destroyed | The Daily Caller
If this Harvard University student got her way, free speech on campus would be abolished and professors with dissenting views fired, because radical leftism is the only permissible political philosophy and the First Amendment is a barrier preventing modern colleges from fulfilling their proper role as indoctrination camps.
Her name is Sandra Korn. She is a senior at Harvard and columnist for the Harvard Crimson.
In a recent column, Korn unambiguously insisted that the university should stop guaranteeing professors and students the right to hold controversial views and pursue research that challenges liberalism.
If our university community opposes racism, sexism, and heterosexism, why should we put up with research that counters our goals? asked Korn in her column.
The columns subtitle was even more direct: Lets give up on academic freedom in favor of justice.
Korn cited several instances of perspectives that clashed with her own being banned from campus as triumphant examples of the way Harvard should be run. The firing of Subramanian Swamy, a Harvard summer school instructor who was dismissed for his anti-Islamic views, was one such triumph.
She also invoked the academic boycott of Israel something condemned by Harvard President Drew Faust and numerous other university presidents as an example of the kind of tactics leftists should defend and use in order to get their way on campus.
Korn did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
---------------------------------------------------------------
The cesspool of shit these universities are producing is truly frightening. Basically, all liberal scumbags.
from the article she actually wrote, not the spin you cheer and spread: "Yet the liberal obsession with academic freedom seems a bit misplaced to me."
She is a leftist Progressive
No liberal could believe what she does, though progressives could and do distort and sling shit like you do
It's a "liberal obsession with academic freedom she criticizes, not the faux freedoms and liberties of the con men
The Doctrine of Academic Freedom | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson
So anyone that wants some regulations directed towards preserving our environment, making sure businesses can't price gauge or a safety net is the same as communism to you. As far as I am concern these things are all elements of being a civilized first world society.
Even child labor laws to you people are communism.
At least we vote for the government.
Let?s Hear It for Price Gouging - Reason.comThat’s because so-called price gouging during an emergency serves two very useful purposes: It keeps people from getting too greedy, and it makes strangers rush to help the stricken.
Take one of the price-gouging cases to arise from Hurricane Ike. Bill Stone, the owner of Bucko’s Pantry in Radford, Virginia, was accused of gouging customers because he briefly jacked up gasoline prices to as much as $5.99 a gallon. He did that because the supply he got from refueling trucks had dropped 70 percent, and demand was going through the roof.
“Area and state consumers were in what can only be described as panic buying,” ran a typical news report at the time. “The crunch at the Wal-Mart and some other local stations began Thursday night as motorists began topping off their tanks and filled cans of gasoline for their personal reserves.”
In fact, so many people in the region bought so much gasoline ahead of the storm that many stations ran dry. But Bucko’s didn’t run out, because during the short time its prices went way up, people bought much less gas there. Bucko’s high prices rationed gasoline in a highly efficient manner. If everyone had done the same thing, then consumers wouldn’t have hoarded fuel, and there would have been enough to go around for everyone.
Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to.Shirley, Obama has a place in his Cabinet for her.
She's an up and coming star!
Censorship is unnecessary. The light of day kills off crazy crap just fine, given time.Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to.Shirley, Obama has a place in his Cabinet for her.
She's an up and coming star!
Tell you what, if you are half as smart as you think you are, and I am as stupid as you actually are, feel free to defend censorship in a debate with me.
Sandra Y.L. Korn 14, a Crimson editorial writer, is a joint history of science and studies of women, gender and sexuality concentrator in Eliot House. Her column usually appears on alternate Mondays.Progressive
No liberal could believe what she does, though progressives could and do distort and sling shit like you do
Ok then. How about you define the difference between a liberal and a progressive for us all. While you're at it define the difference between those two, a communist, a humanitarian, a socialist and a fascist.
This should prove interesting if you're up for it.
The Doctrine of Academic Freedom | Opinion | The Harvard Crimson
She criticizes liberals (not conservatives) for making academic freedom a sacred horse.
nuf said
She is ugly, therefore hates males and is a liberal.
She may be "ugly" to superficial types of people, she has pretty qualities about her. Though I may disagree with what she asserts, she does have intellect and that in itself is a part of "beauty".
Read her article and the OP , misses her overall point. She is basically saying not all opinions should be seen as a legit opinion.
Example. Obama not beimg a natural born citizen should not be respected with a dignified answer which would give said question an air of legitimacy.
Her point is correct, but she may be pushing it a little to far. Id need to read more opinions from her to get a good overall perspective.
Naturally the OP didnt understand her point and the dailycaller failed again.
Who decides which opinions are good and which are not?
It founded this nation. Next!Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to.
Liberalism stands upon the base of the rock of stupidity.
It has to, in order that the masses vote the Liberal, live the Liberal, and perpetuate the Liberal.
It is the ultimate roundabout clusterfuck.
Same shit, different century.It founded this nation. Next!Liberalism stands upon the base of the rock of stupidity.
It has to, in order that the masses vote the Liberal, live the Liberal, and perpetuate the Liberal.
It is the ultimate roundabout clusterfuck.
That was liberalism, not the shit you use.
Another excuse for Republicans to mock education. They are one group of people who want their kids to be just as successful as they aren't.
Censorship is unnecessary. The light of day kills off crazy crap just fine, given time.Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to.
Tell you what, if you are half as smart as you think you are, and I am as stupid as you actually are, feel free to defend censorship in a debate with me.
Same shit, different century.It founded this nation. Next!
That was liberalism, not the shit you use.
If you were smart you'd have noticed that I didn't defend her. Everyone else managed to.Censorship is unnecessary. The light of day kills off crazy crap just fine, given time.Tell you what, if you are half as smart as you think you are, and I am as stupid as you actually are, feel free to defend censorship in a debate with me.
Tell me something, if you actually believe that, why the fuck are you defending a woman who is arguing for it? Did you simply assume that you are so smart that I wouldn't notice how stupid you are?
If you were smart you'd have noticed that I didn't defend her. Everyone else managed to.Censorship is unnecessary. The light of day kills off crazy crap just fine, given time.
Tell me something, if you actually believe that, why the fuck are you defending a woman who is arguing for it? Did you simply assume that you are so smart that I wouldn't notice how stupid you are?
Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to.Shirley, Obama has a place in his Cabinet for her.
She's an up and coming star!
"Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to."If you were smart you'd have noticed that I didn't defend her. Everyone else managed to.Tell me something, if you actually believe that, why the fuck are you defending a woman who is arguing for it? Did you simply assume that you are so smart that I wouldn't notice how stupid you are?
You should tell the mods that someone hacked your account.
Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to.Shirley, Obama has a place in his Cabinet for her.
She's an up and coming star!
Or are you one of those idiots that is going to say you didn't actually say what you said?
"Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to."If you were smart you'd have noticed that I didn't defend her. Everyone else managed to.
You should tell the mods that someone hacked your account.
Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to.
Or are you one of those idiots that is going to say you didn't actually say what you said?
What part of this are you having trouble understanding? I'll help.
You're the one who can't seem to understand written English, and I can't help you if you can't."Kids. This is why we send them to school. Liberalism can stand up to anything, it usually has to."You should tell the mods that someone hacked your account.
Or are you one of those idiots that is going to say you didn't actually say what you said?
What part of this are you having trouble understanding? I'll help.
I guess you really do want me to believe you are that dumb, I should introduce you to [MENTION=41527]Pogo[/MENTION], you have so much in common.
