Has anyone considered that Mueller may be working on a charge of treason against Trump?

[protectionist]

You tell us, dope. You seem to think a finding of a coup is imminent.

No YOU tell us coward. You brought it up. It's your baby.

And while you're at it, why don't you tell us about Crowdstrike ?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Sure. Tell us about the IG investigation, loser.

You brought it up- you tell about it. And again, you pathetic toads are the "losers" (in every branch of the US govt)

You tell us, dope. You seem to think a finding of a coup is imminent.

No YOU tell us coward. You brought it up. It's your baby.

And while you're at it, why don't you tell us about Crowdstrike ?

Tell us about the IG report, loser.

Did it mention crowdstrike?

 

[protectionist]

That would be tragic.

Like the tragedy of Obama getting of the hook for all the jihadist blood on his hands.
Collusion with al Baghdadi (ISIS). Opening up the vacuum for jihad to move in, in Iraq, in 2011. Deaths of 13 Us soldiers in Fort Hood (many more wounded)

 

[dudmuck]

Really?

It named no names?

There were no Americans indicted, shit for brains. Muellers witchhunt is supposedly about collusion. Remember that?

I never mentioned Americans, dope.

If there are no Americans implicated, then it's a farce. You can't have "collusion" without any Americans, now can you, fuck stick.

No Americans implicated? Two weeks ago it was announced that Mueller's team would release evidence tying Manafort chargets to Trump campaign.

But separately on the non-Mueller front, the arrest of Maria Butina points to different collusion.

You mean "collusion" that doesn't involve anyone in the Trump administration or even anyone in the government?

You turds are so desperate.

Huh? Manafort was Trump's campaign manager for almost 5 months.
And Maria Butina was a bridge between Russia and NRA. And the NRA has its testicles in every part of the GOP; especially Rohrabacher.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Charges of treason coud easily be brought against Mueller, who has repeatedly trashed US national security, to appease Muslim Brotherhood front groups, when he was Director of the FBI.

Russia Special Counsel Mueller Worked with Radical Islamist Groups to Purge Anti-Terrorism Training Material Offensive to Muslims - Judicial Watch

Robert Mueller | The Counter Jihad Report

Lawmaker Questions FBI Materials Purge

LOL

 

[bripat9643]

There were no Americans indicted, shit for brains. Muellers witchhunt is supposedly about collusion. Remember that?

I never mentioned Americans, dope.

If there are no Americans implicated, then it's a farce. You can't have "collusion" without any Americans, now can you, fuck stick.

No Americans implicated? Two weeks ago it was announced that Mueller's team would release evidence tying Manafort chargets to Trump campaign.

But separately on the non-Mueller front, the arrest of Maria Butina points to different collusion.

You mean "collusion" that doesn't involve anyone in the Trump administration or even anyone in the government?

You turds are so desperate.

Huh? Manafort was Trump's campaign manager for almost 5 months.
And Maria Butina was a bridge between Russia and NRA. And the NRA has its testicles in every part of the GOP; especially Rohrabacher.

He was Trump's campaign manager for 3 months, and he was never part of the Trump administration. Nothing he is accused of had anything to do with the campaign. The Mueller witch hunt is a dry hole. The latest indictments serve only to drive that point home.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

That would be tragic.

Like the tragedy of Obama getting of the hook for all the jihadist blood on his hands.
Collusion with al Baghdadi (ISIS). Opening up the vacuum for jihad to move in, in Iraq, in 2011. Deaths of 13 Us soldiers in Fort Hood (many more wounded)

No. Not like that at all, dope.

None of that created a constitutional crisis.

 

[protectionist]

LOL

What's so funny ?

 

[protectionist]

So, you're admitting your deflection then?

Why would Crowdstrike be a deflection ? Seems like we were talking about Russian interfering in the 2016 election, right ?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

So, you're admitting your deflection then?

Why would Crowdstrike be a deflection ? Seems like we were talking about Russian interfering in the 2016 election, right ?

Nope. That was not the topic.

 

[protectionist]

And I clarified your tragic misstep.

No misstep. So by now, it looks like you don't want to talk about the IG report. No problem. You don't have to.

 

[flacaltenn]

People keep talking about collusion despite the fact that collusion is not a crime. However, conspiracy to hack into the DNC email system AND obstruction of justice are both crimes and would qualify as high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of impeachment.

But what if that's not the least of it?

After all, isn't it strange that Trump never says anything bad or negative about Putin? Isn't it also extremely odd that Trump keeps denying Russian interference in the 2016 election despite overwhelming evidence provided by numerous intelligence agencies? And why hasn't Trump enacted the sanctions that congress overwhelmingly voted on last year?

Let me propose a possible theory of what happened in the past and what's happening behind the scenes now: Years ago, Trump struck a bargain with the devil (so to speak). He agreed to help Russians launder money (which is, of course, illegal) in exchange for payment. For the most part, these transactions mostly flew under the radar. However, the Russians would certainly have evidence of all of these transactions although they would certainly have no incentive to blow the whistle on Trump. But once Trump ran for president and WON the election, the Russians would now have leverage over Trump. That leverage would give the Russians the power to blackmail Trump. At this point, Trump had a choice. One choice was the choice of a patriot: refuse to give in to the blackmail and risk the possibility that the money laundering scheme would go public. The other choice is the choice of a traitor who would place his own personal interest above the interests of the USA while also betraying his oath of office. In other words, Trump is quite possibly putting the interests of Putin and Russia above that of his own country and is essentially a foreign agent, and a turncoat. More plainly, it's quite possible that President Trump is a traitor.

What say you?

Those money laundering allegations you hoisted are SERIOUS. But they require INTENT and knowledge of the operation. Putin himself brought up the money laundering in that press conference. AND alleged complicitiy by US Intel orgs.

So -- it WOULD BE serious if Trump WAS blackmailable. It's serious ANY TIME a key US leader CAN even possibly be hiding something that would be compromising. But there's a simple solution. And that is to ROB the blackmailers of the value of that "compromat" by just admitting you sold NYC real estate to Russians and you had NO IDEA of the money chain. That's the simple end of your conspiracy theory. Because that's how people GET and RETAIN security clearances when something embarrassing pops up. They just admit it and life goes on.

Now -- OTHand -- I have a theory I'll wager money on that is the SAME type of "theory". And that is that the Russians DID hack the DNC, maybe Podesta, but THEY DID NOT release the information. Listen carefully to what I told above. The STANDARD way of sanitizing compromising material is to EXPOSE it. And I'm betting that a Dem Administration KNEW that Hillary needed to be cleansed and sanitized from the valuable into that Putin had on the "next President of the USA" and the Intel Groups (Clapper, Brennan, et al) ran an illegal domestic op to LEAK SOME of that material and ROB Putin of the investment he put into getting all that.

If you're gonna understand how this works with blackmail and compromise and international spying, you'd have to consider BOTH of these theories and how the standard practice is to lance it and sterilize it when it's discovered.

 

[TheMoreYouKnow]

It's pretty obvious Dishonest Don is working under the Putin communist umbrella. So of course Mueller is trying to save American Democracy and oust this dictator at any legal means.

 

[protectionist]

Nope. That was not the topic.

So the charge that Russians meddled in the 2016 election, is not part of the topic of the notion that Mueller may be working on a charge of treason against Trump ? That's what you're saying ?

 

[protectionist]

It's pretty obvious Dishonest Don is working under the Putin communist umbrella. So of course Mueller is trying to save American Democracy and oust this dictator at any legal means.

Oh really ? And where does all this obviousness come fro ?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Nope. That was not the topic.

So the charge that Russians meddled in the 2016 election, is not part of the topic of the notion that Mueller at be working on a charge of treason against Trump ? ha's what you're saying ?

Such a loser.

Keep deflecting.

 

[flacaltenn]

Sure. Tell us about the IG investigation, loser.

You brought it up- you tell about it. And again, you pathetic toads are the "losers" (in every branch of the US govt)

You tell us, dope. You seem to think a finding of a coup is imminent.

No YOU tell us coward. You brought it up. It's your baby.

And while you're at it, why don't you tell us about Crowdstrike ?

Tell us about the IG report, loser.

Did it mention crowdstrike?

Now see -- if your only sources of news weren't CNN/MSNBC and SNLive -- you'd KNOW that the recent IG report was TOTALLY confined to the Clinton matter and there will be a SERIES of them. The next due out is about the campaign collusion with the Russians. So THAT report will cover the FBI dealings with Crowdstrike.

Fire Morning Joe and get some better morons to inform you...

 

[protectionist]

Such a loser.

Keep deflecting.

That means that yes, you DO think that the charge that Russians meddled in the 2016 election, is not part of the topic of the notion that Mueller at be working on a charge of treason against Trump ? Tell us more.

 

[TheMoreYouKnow]

DOJ releases Carter Page FISA docs

The Department of Justice has released documents relating to a FISA warrant against Carter Page, a former campaign adviser to then-candidate Donald Trump.

Though heavily redacted, the documents show that the infamous Steele Dossier was a major component of the 2016 surveillance warrant. The dossier was also a major component in subsequent renewals.

Based on what is visible, the dossier is not described as a political document, as the Democrats have asserted; rather the FBI speculates to the FISA court that it was commissioned to damage Candidate 1, who is Donald Trump.

On page 16, the full quote reads: “The FBI speculates to the FISA court that the U.S. person was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit candidate 1’s campaign."

Fox believes that the U.S. person is Glenn Simpson, co-founder of Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm that funded the Steele Dossier.

Reacting to the document release, Page told Fox News, "I'm having trouble finding any small bit of this document that rises above complete ignorance and/or insanity."

The materials released by the DOJ include an October 2016 application to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to wiretap Page as well as several renewal applications, the New York Times reported. It is highly unusual for documents related to FISA wiretap applications to be released.

The surveillance of Page became a contentious matter between Republican and Democratic lawmakers earlier this year. Republicans alleged the FBI had abused its surveillance powers and improperly obtained the warrant, a charge that Democrats rebutted as both sides characterized the documents in different ways. The documents, meanwhile, remained out of public view.

House Democrats were quick to say that the documents bolstered their arguments.

Trump declassified the memo over the objections of the FBI, which warned that the document contained “material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy,” the Hill report said.

DOJ releases Carter Page FISA docs

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Sure. Tell us about the IG investigation, loser.

You brought it up- you tell about it. And again, you pathetic toads are the "losers" (in every branch of the US govt)

You tell us, dope. You seem to think a finding of a coup is imminent.

No YOU tell us coward. You brought it up. It's your baby.

And while you're at it, why don't you tell us about Crowdstrike ?

Tell us about the IG report, loser.

Did it mention crowdstrike?

Now see -- if your only sources of news weren't CNN/MSNBC and SNLive -- you'd KNOW that the recent IG report was TOTALLY confined to the Clinton matter and there will be a SERIES of them. The next due out is about the campaign collusion with the Russians. So THAT report will cover the FBI dealings with Crowdstrike.

Fire Morning Joe and get some better morons to inform you...

Who says crowdstike is either relevant or necessary to any findings?

Do you imagine all of the detail in the indictments came from crowdstrike?