Hateful Facebook Libs Control Free Speech On Diamond And Silk?

[airplanemechanic]

Hogwash? So if I own and run a server, I have to let you say what you want on it? REALLY?

What is unsafe espousing a conservative view to running our government? Advocating the 2nd amendment? Opposing liberal views on these two topics are never squashed. The conservative side always is. And it's getting worse.

No true liberal would allow this.

I never said there was anything unsafe about diamond and silk. What I am saying is that facebook is private, it's not gov't run. The constitution doesn't apply to it. Zucker is well within his rights to ban whoever he wants.

 

[airplanemechanic]

You chums keep forgetting that Facebook is a privately owned company, not a government agency. Remember how excited you guys were when Chick-fil-a wasn't gonna let homosexual people eat there? Same kinda thing.

Got your facts wrong there, Melvin.

Sorry those facts are exactly right.

The first amendment has to do with restrictions on free speech put in place BY GOVERNMENT not by private citizens on their servers.

Just like if I say you aren't allowed to carry a gun in my house its not a violation of 2nd amendment because it's my house, I make the rules. It's my server, I make the rules. If this forum wanted to they could block and ban all conservatives and nothing could be done. Why? It's privately owned.

 

[deannalw]

Goes to show how fake Zuckerberg is. Cause he knew his employees allowed the censoring of conservatives speaking politics. So now they comeback after getting exposed. Diamond and Silk win

No political speech should be silenced.this isn't hard zuckerberg.

On a private server he can silence anyone for any reason or no reason at all.

I wonder what might happen if he were to silence black lives matter? David Hogg. Maxine Waters. Antifa? Any anti-trump group?

 

[cnm]

Here is another grilling he got about the left wings racist ways.

From a Louisiana Republican! Folks, we're in the post humour society.

 

[deannalw]

Hogwash? So if I own and run a server, I have to let you say what you want on it? REALLY?

What is unsafe espousing a conservative view to running our government? Advocating the 2nd amendment? Opposing liberal views on these two topics are never squashed. The conservative side always is. And it's getting worse.

No true liberal would allow this.

I never said there was anything unsafe about diamond and silk. What I am saying is that facebook is private, it's not gov't run. The constitution doesn't apply to it. Zucker is well within his rights to ban whoever he wants.

Try owning your own bakery and saying no to a gay cake.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Here

 

[dblack]

Lakhota the typical Trump hater of course puts that as funny. Goes to show how loopy the average Trump haters have gotten with no substance and deflections. While thinking real life is a joke...

Is there a way to rate a whole thread funny? Or do you just have to do it one post at a time?

 

[mdk]

I’ll admit, watching people flip their positions on discriminatory business practices when they feel targeted is rather comical to me. You don’t have a right to post on Facebook, Twitter, and, YouTube.

 

[dblack]

I’ll admit, watching people flip their positions on discriminatory business practices when they feel targeted is rather comical to me. You don’t have a right to post Facebook, Twitter, and, YouTube.

Tell me about it. And it's both sides flipping. Republicans are whining about discrimination and Democrats are defending the prerogative of private business.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Yes the same republicans that say a wedding cake maker can refuse to make a wedding cake for a gay is crying like a baby when Facebook is refusing to let their conservative views be heard.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

As a libertarian, I support both 100%.

 

[mdk]

I’ll admit, watching people flip their positions on discriminatory business practices when they feel targeted is rather comical to me. You don’t have a right to post Facebook, Twitter, and, YouTube.

Tell me about it. And it's both sides flipping. Republicans are whining about discrimination and Democrats are defending the prerogative of private business.

Such fickle principles.

 

[airplanemechanic]

Goes to show how fake Zuckerberg is. Cause he knew his employees allowed the censoring of conservatives speaking politics. So now they comeback after getting exposed. Diamond and Silk win

No political speech should be silenced.this isn't hard zuckerberg.

On a private server he can silence anyone for any reason or no reason at all.

I wonder what might happen if he were to silence black lives matter? David Hogg. Maxine Waters. Antifa? Any anti-trump group?

Well start your own private server and ban those people and find out what would happen!

 

[Missouri_Mike]

You chums keep forgetting that Facebook is a privately owned company, not a government agency. Remember how excited you guys were when Chick-fil-a wasn't gonna let homosexual people eat there? Same kinda thing.

They were up until they opened their doors to a political party to get information and began being a shill for progressive causes. That changed everything.

Lol, yeah, when they took Russian money to help trump get elected it really kinda screwed up stuff didn't it.

Russian money? That whole 100 grand in advertising? Stormy got more for spreading her legs than Facebook got out of the Russians. How much did he get from the democrats when they were bragging about their pulling peoples private info off Facebook and saying it was the greatest move ever? It wasn't that long ago Zuckerburg was the hero of the dems for getting that information out to them. He only got in trouble when a republican group slipped into the mix.

There's no fucking Russia problem. It's a democrat problem. That party makes the Russians look like amatuers in corruption.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

You chums keep forgetting that Facebook is a privately owned company, not a government agency. Remember how excited you guys were when Chick-fil-a wasn't gonna let homosexual people eat there? Same kinda thing.

They were up until they opened their doors to a political party to get information and began being a shill for progressive causes. That changed everything.

Lol, yeah, when they took Russian money to help trump get elected it really kinda screwed up stuff didn't it.

Show us on the doll where Putin touched you to make you flip your vote

Don't be stupider than you have to be.

You're the only one going full retard here.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

You chums keep forgetting that Facebook is a privately owned company, not a government agency. Remember how excited you guys were when Chick-fil-a wasn't gonna let homosexual people eat there? Same kinda thing.

They were up until they opened their doors to a political party to get information and began being a shill for progressive causes. That changed everything.

Lol, yeah, when they took Russian money to help trump get elected it really kinda screwed up stuff didn't it.

One more question. Are the 80's and their policies back? We were told by obie that was a thing to be laughed at.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

You chums keep forgetting that Facebook is a privately owned company, not a government agency. Remember how excited you guys were when Chick-fil-a wasn't gonna let homosexual people eat there? Same kinda thing.

They were up until they opened their doors to a political party to get information and began being a shill for progressive causes. That changed everything.

Lol, yeah, when they took Russian money to help trump get elected it really kinda screwed up stuff didn't it.

Show us on the doll where Putin touched you to make you flip your vote

Don't be stupider than you have to be.

We're supposed too believe that you resisted Putin's Facebook Mind Control Beam.

Sureeeeeee

 

[WEATHER53]

Zuck stammering about Silicon Valley as the excuse. He is only there to say "Russians"

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I’ll admit, watching people flip their positions on discriminatory business practices when they feel targeted is rather comical to me. You don’t have a right to post Facebook, Twitter, and, YouTube.

Tell me about it. And it's both sides flipping. Republicans are whining about discrimination and Democrats are defending the prerogative of private business.

Actually not.

Democrats have consistently and correctly acknowledged the fact that ‘free speech’ has no application in the private sector, that only government has the authority to regulate speech, and that private media entities are at liberty to edit content as they see fit, where edited or remove content in no manner ‘violates’ free speech.

And Republicans have consistently exhibited their ignorance with regard to private media entities and the editing of content, incorrectly claiming that edited or removed content ‘violates’ free speech, when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

Nothing has changed – the right is just as ignorant and dishonest, this thread premise is yet another example of that.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Lakhota the typical Trump hater of course puts that as funny. Goes to show how loopy the average Trump haters have gotten with no substance and deflections. While thinking real life is a joke...

I also ‘put a funny.’

That’s because your ignorance and stupidity, and that of most of your fellow rightists, is both amusing and sad.

Facebook isn’t subject to ‘free speech’ doctrine.

Facebook has nothing to do with the DNC.

Neither Facebook nor the DNC have anything to do with ‘socialism.’

And nothing is being ‘controlled’ by the state.

 

[AvgGuyIA]

USMB should own and run Facebook. This is how fair and balanced social media should be.