Have Democrats ever showed us how our 'black communities' benefit from the presence of illegals?

[pknopp]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

Then why not just have a private conversation if you are gonna be all secret squirrel 'n'nat?

I made my point with the OP.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Do they?
How do they?
Can Democrats really do quality work for both 'groups'...illegals and blacks?
I can't help but wonder why blacks don't seem to see illegal's as a problem, as a roadblock to prosperity for them.
Don't illegals work jobs that blacks worked for decades?
Don't they run them out of their neighborhoods by driving up rents?
Don't illegals take from their children's education quality?
Don't they create delays and backlogs within social services?
Don't they reduce the amount of help and money we can provide to black communities?

By embracing the presence of illegals, providing sanctuary and encouraging more immigration it just seems like Democrats are doing a great disservice to our black communities.

Strawman fallacy and a lie.

Why pray tell?

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

Then why not just have a private conversation if you are gonna be all secret squirrel 'n'nat?

I made my point with the OP.

Which post number dude?

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Like Russia and Orange Man Mean / Bad?
Post something relevant to the premise of the thread, maybe answer some of the questions that were posed...huh?

You've been answered many times. You expect others do what you will not do.

Who is "others"?

What is "what"?

Vague References.

TIA.

The OP has been answered many times in the past. I have no obligation to repeat them all to you.

Apparently you are incapble of posting simple English sentences that others can understand.

The hall mark of inner-city public school education.

Bet you he can sling rock and shoot a 9 sideways.

 

[pknopp]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

Then why not just have a private conversation if you are gonna be all secret squirrel 'n'nat?

I made my point with the OP.

Which post number dude?

#2.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No, actually I really don't.
You've spent some time on this in this thread...seems easier to just engage...no?

 

[bripat9643]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No one else does, however.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

Then why not just have a private conversation if you are gonna be all secret squirrel 'n'nat?

I made my point with the OP.

Which post number dude?

#2.

Please see number 4.

 

[pknopp]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No, actually I really don't.
You've spent some time on this in this thread...seems easier to just engage...no?

Would it make any difference than the many other times?

 

[pknopp]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No one else does, however.

Yes you do.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No one else does, however.

Yes you do.

I for one, fine sir, do not.

 

[bripat9643]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No one else does, however.

Yes you do.

That's it: just run away like a scared little puppy.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No, actually I really don't.
You've spent some time on this in this thread...seems easier to just engage...no?

Would it make any difference than the many other times?

link please?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No, actually I really don't.
You've spent some time on this in this thread...seems easier to just engage...no?

Would it make any difference than the many other times?

Let's work this from another angle....we will accept a YES or NO.
Don't be scared, ready...here goes.
Does our black population benefit from the presence of illegals?

 

[pknopp]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No one else does, however.

Yes you do.

I for one, fine sir, do not.

The OP would not hold the Republicans for what he says he wants done but is complaining that others will not either. It doesn't work that way.

 

[pknopp]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No, actually I really don't.
You've spent some time on this in this thread...seems easier to just engage...no?

Would it make any difference than the many other times?

Let's work this from another angle....we will accept a YES or NO.
Don't be scared, ready...here goes.
Does our black population benefit from the presence of illegals?

Only business does. But you know that already.

 

[bripat9643]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No, actually I really don't.
You've spent some time on this in this thread...seems easier to just engage...no?

Would it make any difference than the many other times?

Let's work this from another angle....we will accept a YES or NO.
Don't be scared, ready...here goes.
Does our black population benefit from the presence of illegals?

Only business does. But you know that already.

That means "no," blacks do not benefit from the presence of illegal aliens.

 

[danielpalos]

Do they?
How do they?
Can Democrats really do quality work for both 'groups'...illegals and blacks?
I can't help but wonder why blacks don't seem to see illegal's as a problem, as a roadblock to prosperity for them.
Don't illegals work jobs that blacks worked for decades?
Don't they run them out of their neighborhoods by driving up rents?
Don't illegals take from their children's education quality?
Don't they create delays and backlogs within social services?
Don't they reduce the amount of help and money we can provide to black communities?

By embracing the presence of illegals, providing sanctuary and encouraging more immigration it just seems like Democrats are doing a great disservice to our black communities.

We would have no illegal problem or any illegal underclass if right wingers could be Legal to express Constitutional law.

 

[pknopp]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No, actually I really don't.
You've spent some time on this in this thread...seems easier to just engage...no?

Would it make any difference than the many other times?

Let's work this from another angle....we will accept a YES or NO.
Don't be scared, ready...here goes.
Does our black population benefit from the presence of illegals?

Only business does. But you know that already.

That means "no," blacks do not benefit from the presence of illegal aliens.

Neither do you but you won't do anything about it either.

 

[bripat9643]

Why do you expect them to support what you won't?

Who is "them"?

What is "what"?

Vague references.

It's been discussed here endlessly.

Your sentence is ambiguous, idiot.

The OP understands.

No, actually I really don't.
You've spent some time on this in this thread...seems easier to just engage...no?

Would it make any difference than the many other times?

Let's work this from another angle....we will accept a YES or NO.
Don't be scared, ready...here goes.
Does our black population benefit from the presence of illegals?

Only business does. But you know that already.

That means "no," blacks do not benefit from the presence of illegal aliens.

Neither do you but you won't do anything about it either.

I won't do anything about illegal aliens? I voted for Trump. What more do you believe I should do, shoot them?