'He wrote all of it down?': Prosecutors claim to have handwritten notes of Trump hush money scheme

[Rawley]

#1 It wasn't "He" it was checks issued by the Trump Organization which is a business entity.

As a business? Yes.

Because there is a difference between paying Attorney Fee's which have to be reported as income on a 1099 and reimbursement for expenses which are not considered income.

WW

Bullshit. You write your lawyer a check for $10,000, $3,000 of which is a disbursement, You're putting $10,000 on your 1099 to her.

 

[Rawley]

As far as businesses are concerned… legal fees and campaign contributions have to be recorded differently

Please don't insult us with that nonsense.

 

[Lesh]

Please don't insult us with that nonsense.

What?

 

[Rawley]

What?

Campaign violation. Bragg, as well as Biden's own FEC and DOJ refused bring campaign violation charges. So don't insult us with your cockamamie theory.

 

[marvin martian]

As far as businesses are concerned… legal fees and campaign contributions have to be recorded differently

LOL

Democratic donors paid more than $1M for Biden’s legal bills for special counsel probe​

Democratic donors paid more than $1M for Biden's legal bills for special counsel probe

Democratic donors covered more than $1 million in legal fees racked up by attorneys representing President Joe Biden in a yearlong special counsel probe into his handling of classified documents.

apnews.com

 

[Lesh]

LOL

Democratic donors paid more than $1M for Biden’s legal bills for special counsel probe​

Democratic donors paid more than $1M for Biden's legal bills for special counsel probe

Democratic donors covered more than $1 million in legal fees racked up by attorneys representing President Joe Biden in a yearlong special counsel probe into his handling of classified documents.

apnews.com

Did they record those donations as legal fees?

No?

 

[Lesh]

Campaign violation. Bragg, as well as Biden's own FEC and DOJ refused bring campaign violation charges. So don't insult us with your cockamamie theory.

That’s not me. That the charges

 

[Rawley]

That’s not me. That the charges

Nope. do you folks read any of the documents in these cases, or do you simply make shit up?

 

[Flopper]

Cohen and Trump laundered the money together.

The NDA is legal, but it was a campaign expense. Trump didn't pay Karen McDougal or the doorman anything. David Pecker did for the express purposes of protecting Trump's campaign.

The NDAs were all made DURING the campaign. Not before. Check your dates.

Campaign funds are those used to promote the election of a candidate. It makes no difference whether the funds came from the candidate's campaign chest, a contribution, or from the candidates personal account. They are all campaign expenses and have to be reported.

If a 3rd party pays money to promote the election of a candidate, it is a campaign expense and must be reported. Who reports it depends on who ultimately put up the money. In other words if Pecker pays hush money, and Cohen arranges reimbursement from a shell corporation that he funds and has agreement with Trump to be reimbursed after the election, then it is Trump that reports the payment as a campaign expense even thou it is after the election. Of course Trump did not report it because the whole purpose of the scheme was hide Trump's part in the hush money payments.

Bullshit. You write your lawyer a check for $10,000, $3,000 of which is a disbursement, You're putting $10,000 on your 1099 to her.

You would give the lawyer a check for $10,000 and record it in your business records as a $7,000 legal expense and 3,000 as an expense that describes the disbursement. If your relationship with the lawyer was that of a contractor, then you would issue a 1099 for $10,000. If you have no agreement with the lawyer, then there would be no need for a 1099.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Bullshit. You write your lawyer a check for $10,000, $3,000 of which is a disbursement, You're putting $10,000 on your 1099 to her.

Actually for the lawyers we use representing the organization. Attorney fees for services are listed separately from reimbursements for expenses because of the of difference on how they are treated for tax purposes.

WW

 

[Flopper]

The hush money payments and the catch and kill scheme are violations of state statue 175-10, Conspiracy to Promote and Prevent Election.

Everything every candidate does is to promote their election.
Biden is handing out hundreds of billions in taxpayer funded loan forgiveness to promote his election.
String him up!!!

According to the FEC, that is not so. If the sole purpose of an expense is to promote his election then it is a campaign expense. If the expense can be logically split between promoting the election and another activity then it's reported to the FEC in that way. Where it is impossible to determine how much of the expense is promoting the election and other activities, it is not reported.

 

[Flopper]

The democrats cheat in the tens of millions column

So you have no idea how that supposed cheating would result in a stolen election.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

So are all campaign promises then

Only if they promote your election.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The democrats cheat in the tens of millions column

Liar.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Campaign funds are those used to promote the election of a candidate. It makes no difference whether the funds came from the candidate's campaign chest, a contribution, or from the candidates personal account. They are all campaign expenses and have to be reported.

If a 3rd party pays money to promote the election of a candidate, it is a campaign expense and must be reported. Who reports it depends on who ultimately put up the money. In other words if Pecker pays hush money, and Cohen arranges reimbursement from a shell corporation that he funds and has agreement with Trump to be reimbursed after the election, then it is Trump that reports the payment as a campaign expense even thou it is after the election. Of course Trump did not report it because the whole purpose of the scheme was hide Trump's part in the hush money payments.


You would give the lawyer a check for $10,000 and record it in your business records as a $7,000 legal expense and 3,000 as an expense that describes the disbursement. If your relationship with the lawyer was that of a contractor, then you would issue a 1099 for $10,000. If you have no agreement with the lawyer, then there would be no need for a 1099.

If a 3rd party pays money to promote the election of a candidate, it is a campaign expense and must be reported.

The salary of reporters at the New York Times is reported as a Biden campaign expense?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

If a 3rd party pays money to promote the election of a candidate, it is a campaign expense and must be reported.

The salary of reporters at the New York Times is reported as a Biden campaign expense?

(Don't feed the sealions)

 

[Rawley]

You would give the lawyer a check for $10,000 and record it in your business records as a $7,000 legal expense and 3,000 as an expense that describes the disbursement.

Bullshit. You expose yourself as someone that's never run a business that's used lawyers.

If your relationship with the lawyer was that of a contractor, then you would issue a 1099 for $10,000. If you have no agreement with the lawyer, then there would be no need for a 1099.

Again, bullshit. Your company writes a lawyer a check for $10,000, you have an agreement with her and you are issuing her a 1099.

 

[Rawley]

Actually for the lawyers we use representing the organization. Attorney fees for services are listed separately from reimbursements for expenses because of the of difference on how they are treated for tax purposes.

WW

Bullshit. He includes a $40,000 payment for an expert witness on his $100,000 invoice, your putting down $100,000 as legal fees.

 

[IM2]

Its funny how the cult members can see all kinds of crimes by Biden with no evidence, but can't see any crime by Trump with mountains of evidence. b

 

[IM2]

Biden has spent $146 billion in taxpayer funds on student loan forgiveness with the goal of helping his election chances.

Another stupid false equivalence.