Here we go!

Nothing burger. States should not get Federal money to support illegal aliens and representation in Congress.

Wait until Kav throws the DACA pen and phone out the window.

Can't wait.
 
Nothing burger. States should not get Federal money to support illegal aliens and representation in Congress.

Wait until Kav throws the DACA pen and phone out the window.

Can't wait.

Your claim is on a single issue, the point is precedent. An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Such as POTUS imperious to being subpoenaed to testify with documents (such as tapes, memo's, E-Mails, tweets, etc.).
 
Nothing burger. States should not get Federal money to support illegal aliens and representation in Congress.

Wait until Kav throws the DACA pen and phone out the window.

Can't wait.

Your claim is on a single issue, the point is precedent. An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Such as POTUS imperious to being subpoenaed to testify with documents (such as tapes, memo's, E-Mails, tweets, etc.).


The libtardos are the clowns who think the Constitution is a living document. That precedent doesn't count in libtardo land.
 
“…is the Executive Branch above the law?”

For conservatives it is when a Republican is president.
 
Nothing burger. States should not get Federal money to support illegal aliens and representation in Congress.

Wait until Kav throws the DACA pen and phone out the window.

Can't wait.

Your claim is on a single issue, the point is precedent. An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Such as POTUS imperious to being subpoenaed to testify with documents (such as tapes, memo's, E-Mails, tweets, etc.).
Correct.

And we have a five-justice rightist majority likely hostile to precedent, willing to ignore precedent and follow wrongheaded conservative judicial dogma instead.
 
SC justice Kavanaugh bitches. Kavanaugh will follow the US Constitution not make up law as he goes like the left's liberal justices.
 
I'm sort of leaning towards the hope that the Trump administration loses this one. It is one of those that sounds good at present, but could bite us in the butt with future administrations. I would need to hear both sides of argument and remove thought of my favoring this specific instance of the citizenship question within the census.
 
Nothing burger. States should not get Federal money to support illegal aliens and representation in Congress.

Wait until Kav throws the DACA pen and phone out the window.

Can't wait.

Your claim is on a single issue, the point is precedent. An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Such as POTUS imperious to being subpoenaed to testify with documents (such as tapes, memo's, E-Mails, tweets, etc.).
Correct.

And we have a five-justice rightist majority likely hostile to precedent, willing to ignore precedent and follow wrongheaded conservative judicial dogma instead.

The SC has overruled precedent dozens of times, how many of those rulings favored Dem's hmmm?
 
Nothing burger. States should not get Federal money to support illegal aliens and representation in Congress.

Wait until Kav throws the DACA pen and phone out the window.

Can't wait.

Your claim is on a single issue, the point is precedent. An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Such as POTUS imperious to being subpoenaed to testify with documents (such as tapes, memo's, E-Mails, tweets, etc.).


The libtardos are the clowns who think the Constitution is a living document. That precedent doesn't count in libtardo land.

???????????????????????????????????!
 
Nothing burger. States should not get Federal money to support illegal aliens and representation in Congress.

Wait until Kav throws the DACA pen and phone out the window.

Can't wait.

Your claim is on a single issue, the point is precedent. An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Such as POTUS imperious to being subpoenaed to testify with documents (such as tapes, memo's, E-Mails, tweets, etc.).
Correct.

And we have a five-justice rightist majority likely hostile to precedent, willing to ignore precedent and follow wrongheaded conservative judicial dogma instead.

The SC has overruled precedent dozens of times, how many of those rulings favored Dem's hmmm?

I'll bite, how many?
 
I'm sort of leaning towards the hope that the Trump administration loses this one. It is one of those that sounds good at present, but could bite us in the butt with future administrations. I would need to hear both sides of argument and remove thought of my favoring this specific instance of the citizenship question within the census.

The argument against is the 10th Amendment.
 
Justice Kavanaugh will be tested sooner than later. The issue, is the Executive Branch above the law?

See: Kavanaugh’s first vote could be in Trump executive power fight


NYC has no standing to object to questions on the census or depose the administration officials responsible for making those decisions.

Any one with a brain can read the 14th Amendment and see it demands that anyone of voting age that are not eligible to vote should NOT BE COUNTED FOR REPRESENTATION. You can find it in Section 2.

.
 
Nothing burger. States should not get Federal money to support illegal aliens and representation in Congress.

Wait until Kav throws the DACA pen and phone out the window.

Can't wait.

Your claim is on a single issue, the point is precedent. An earlier event or action that is regarded as an example or guide to be considered in subsequent similar circumstances.

Such as POTUS imperious to being subpoenaed to testify with documents (such as tapes, memo's, E-Mails, tweets, etc.).
Correct.

And we have a five-justice rightist majority likely hostile to precedent, willing to ignore precedent and follow wrongheaded conservative judicial dogma instead.

The SC has overruled precedent dozens of times, how many of those rulings favored Dem's hmmm?

I'll bite, how many?

Learn what a rhetorical question is. :itsok:
 
Justice Kavanaugh will be tested sooner than later. The issue, is the Executive Branch above the law?

See: Kavanaugh’s first vote could be in Trump executive power fight
Kavanaugh has already been tested as he served for 12 years on the Appeals Court, and the fact that none of his detractors were able to find anything wrong in his judgement or "judicial temperament" on the Appeals Court shows he passed the test with flying colors even in the judgement of who oppose him now. It is the Democrats who failed their test by showing utter disregard for the truth or the law or common decency.
 

Forum List

Back
Top