Here's why they cannot indict Trump, no matter how many classified documents that he failed to return they find

[jknowgood]

Not at all; What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email Server

Lol, the fbi said.

 

[Chillicothe]

why can’t you all get a trump indictment then?

Patience, Grasshopper.
That cake is still baking.
DTrump seems to be in a pickle (again).
So let's be patient and vigilant and see what develops.
After all, the news out of the MAL search-thingy seems to keep getting worse and worser for the owner of the golf club.
IMHO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"When we take over both houses next year, I hope the fbi and doj is ready for a Mueller type investigation into them."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And that may very well come to pass....both the election business, and the subsequent investigations. So be it. It has been ever thus.

In the meantime though, if the DOJ acquires evidence and proofs that their seasoned and experienced prosecutors believe is reliable enough and persuasive enough to take before a grand jury with the intention to seek an indictment.......well, shouldn't they do that as required by their sworn oath?

Shouldn't America be shown what this evidence is (via a trial)?
Should the allegations of improperly taken sensitive documents be examined and autopsied in a transparent venue?

In short, if Don Trump committed crimes should he not be held accountable before a jury of his peers? Ala' the American Constitution? Then all of America can feel assured that no individual is above the laws of the land. If he is innocent of whatever charges.....then we need know that. If he is guilty.....then, of course, we need know that too.

 

[Billo_Really]

It's the Hillary Doctrine, as stated by James Comey:



Hillary falsely claimed that she never sent or received classified documents over her private email server, with classification markings, when she indeed had classified documents, with classification markings, on her email servers.

She falsely claimed that she had returned all work-related emails, but the FBI found thousands that were not returned. She falsely told the DOJ that her lawyers had read all of the emails to determine which were personal and which were work-related, and were overly inclusive in returning those work-related, when her lawyers had not looked at each email individually, but used some sort of search function.

she falsely claimed not to have emailed any classified documents (over a servers less secure than a gmail account), when she had.

Those are false exculpatory statements, which Comey stated are used as evidence of intent.

This is not about telling a cop "why give me a speeding ticket when so many others are speeding." It's about completely disparate treatment of one person over another based on Party affiliation.

If you got a ticketed one morning on a road in which many others were speeding, you might just chalk it up to bad luck. If an army of traffic cops hound you for seven years with radar guns, chase vehicles, and helicopters measuring the time it takes you to drive between two marks on the road, when they ignore other drivers who actually are speeding, you would not think it was co-ink-ee-dink.

This case is not like Hillary's, so back the fuck up!

 

[BrokeLoser]

That's correct, you are nowhere close to sane.

It's pretty much a FACT that trump stole top secret documents.
You just think is not a crime, unless Hillary did it.

“It’s a fact” because a court made a decision or because some loons in cyberspace did?

 

[BrokeLoser]

Patience, Grasshopper.
That cake is still baking.
DTrump seems to be in a pickle (again).
So let's be patient and vigilant and see what develops.
After all, the news out of the MAL search-thingy seems to keep getting worse and worser for the owner of the golf club.
IMHO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And that may very well come to pass....both the election business, and the subsequent investigations. So be it. It has been ever thus.

In the meantime though, if the DOJ acquires evidence and proofs that their seasoned and experienced prosecutors believe is reliable enough and persuasive enough to take before a grand jury with the intention to seek an indictment.......well, shouldn't they do that as required by their sworn oath?

Shouldn't America be shown what this evidence is (via a trial)?
Should the allegations of improperly taken sensitive documents be examined and autopsied in a transparent venue?

In short, if Don Trump committed crimes should he not be held accountable before a jury of his peers? Ala' the American Constitution? Then all of America can feel assured that no individual is above the laws of the land. If he is innocent of whatever charges.....then we need know that. If he is guilty.....then, of course, we need know that too.

Are you whackos hiring Robert Mueller for $50 million to prove you wrong again?

 

[Chillicothe]

Are you whackos hiring Robert Mueller for $50 million to prove you wrong again?

I have no idea who the poster 'Broke Loser' is referencing when he lumps my poor avatar in as "you whackos".

Poster BL, my avatar ain't real. It's a made up name as an internet identity used for privacy reasons.
And my avatar has nothing....zero....to do with Robert Mueller.
Why would you suggest such?
It seems silly and unthinking to do so.

No disrespect intended.
But good luck though in your pursuit of these alleged 'whackos'.
By the way, what have you personally done to pursue such? Please don't say that shrilling on an internet gossipboard is your contribution to the cause.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I have no idea who the poster 'Broke Loser' is referencing when he lumps my poor avatar in as "you whackos".

Poster BL, my avatar ain't real. It's a made up name as an internet identity used for privacy reasons.
And my avatar has nothing....zero....to do with Robert Mueller.
Why would you suggest such?
It seems silly and unthinking to do so.

No disrespect intended.
But good luck though in your pursuit of these alleged 'whackos'.
By the way, what have you personally done to pursue such? Please don't say that shrilling on an internet gossipboard is your contribution to the cause.

The mumbo-jumbo you type is very difficult to sift through and make sense of.…I’m sorry.

 

[Slade3200]

It's the Hillary Doctrine, as stated by James Comey:



Hillary falsely claimed that she never sent or received classified documents over her private email server, with classification markings, when she indeed had classified documents, with classification markings, on her email servers.

She falsely claimed that she had returned all work-related emails, but the FBI found thousands that were not returned. She falsely told the DOJ that her lawyers had read all of the emails to determine which were personal and which were work-related, and were overly inclusive in returning those work-related, when her lawyers had not looked at each email individually, but used some sort of search function.

she falsely claimed not to have emailed any classified documents (over a servers less secure than a gmail account), when she had.

Those are false exculpatory statements, which Comey stated are used as evidence of intent.

This is not about telling a cop "why give me a speeding ticket when so many others are speeding." It's about completely disparate treatment of one person over another based on Party affiliation.

If you got a ticketed one morning on a road in which many others were speeding, you might just chalk it up to bad luck. If an army of traffic cops hound you for seven years with radar guns, chase vehicles, and helicopters measuring the time it takes you to drive between two marks on the road, when they ignore other drivers who actually are speeding, you would not think it was co-ink-ee-dink.

Wasn’t the MAGA crowd chanting and screaming to lock her up? Even after Comey made those statements didn’t the maga crowd attack Comey and scream for justice and law and order? If so then wouldn’t using the Hillary excuse to justify and cover for Trump be the definition of hypocrisy? Have you no principles?

 

[Lakhota]

NaziCon whataboutisms can't save Trump!

 

[BrokeLoser]

Wasn’t the MAGA crowd chanting and screaming to lock her up? Even after Comey made those statements didn’t the maga crowd attack Comey and scream for justice and law and order? If so then wouldn’t using the Hillary excuse to justify and cover for Trump be the definition of hypocrisy? Have you no principles?

Big difference….President Trump said he declassified the documents he possessed and he had the authority to do so.
Try harder.

 

[Chillicothe]

"The mumbo-jumbo you type is very difficult to sift through and make sense of.…I’m sorry."

That is regrettable.
I will take some responsibility for your failure.
I thought of typing slower.....but that seems like a fruitless tactic for helping you.
So let's do this: I will put it into a larger font.
I think that between the two of us....we can get you up-to-speed on communicating on an adult internet chatroom.
So let's try it in a bigger font:

From post #69:
"my avatar has nothing....zero....to do with Robert Mueller.
Why would you suggest such?
It seems silly and unthinking to do so.

 

[BrokeLoser]

That is regrettable.
I will take some responsibility for your failure.
I thought of typing slower.....but that seems like a fruitless tactic for helping you.
So let's do this: I will put it into a larger font.
I think that between the two of us....we can get you up-to-speed on communicating on an adult internet chatroom.
So let's try it in a bigger font:

From post #69:
"my avatar has nothing....zero....to do with Robert Mueller.
Why would you suggest such?
It seems silly and unthinking to do so.

Take note…nobody else here has ever referred to themself, their online persona as an “avatar” as you do quite often….does that mean anything to you? Doesn’t that kind of make you a standalone whacko?

 

[Chillicothe]

"Doesn’t that kind of make you a standalone whacko?"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From post #69:
"my avatar has nothing....zero....to do with Robert Mueller.
Why would you suggest such? It seems silly and unthinking to do so."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Shux, you still didn't under the above? Despite the larger font?
I gotta give up. Have other priorities.
Someone else will need to be your mentor. Your Yoda.
Good luck.

 

[BWK]

You seem to have lost it about the same time as Biden did. I don't know if one triggered the other, or if there is something in the air.

speaking of lost it, have you ever considered the fact, that if Trump wasn't guilty of this crime, he would have already produced the recipts on how this money was spent? there is a reason he has not. And if any human being can't deduce there is a crime here, they are simply covering for a criminal, or too dumb for simple debate.

 

[BWK]

View attachment 694796

Stealing $250 million dollars. Where is it? Stealing classified documents. Why does he have them at his home? It's a federal crime.

 

[BWK]

Won't work. The corruptocrats have been dealing with House oversight for years, they're practiced at the art of stonewalling.

We have to actually elect Steve Bannon president.

Bannon is going to prison for stealing, again.

 

[Slade3200]

Big difference….President Trump said he declassified the documents he possessed and he had the authority to do so.
Try harder.

He may have said that but he is a notorious pathological liar so I don’t believe a word of what he says to try and cover his ass. If he had declassified those documents then there would be record of it. There is no record of it. He is obviously lying again.

 

[BrokeLoser]

He may have said that but he is a notorious pathological liar so I don’t believe a word of what he says to try and cover his ass. If he had declassified those documents then there would be record of it. There is no record of it. He is obviously lying again.

Hahaha….and you didn’t believe him when he said there was no collusion with Russia or quid pro quo with Zelensky…how’d that work out for you TDS’ers?

 

[Slade3200]

Hahaha….and you didn’t believe him when he said there was no collusion with Russia or quid pro quo with Zelensky…how’d that work out for you TDS’ers?

Of course I didn’t because he lied time and time again about Russian contacts as Mueller's investigation uncovered. I never accused him of conspiracy with Russian disinformation but it was obvious that he was lying about contacts. Only a fool would trust Donald Trumps words

 

[Whodatsaywhodat.]

What the FBI Files Reveal About Hillary Clinton’s Email Server

New documents tell the full, strange story of a technophobic VIP, a sloppy State Department, and the jerry-rigged computer that held it all together.<br />

www.politico.com

What a joke. Is this your proof that Hillary is innocent? Your a fool and a tool and a liar.