bendog
Diamond Member
China has total control to do what it wants. Not so here. And you spout like it is the world leader in pollution control.China has 18,000 miles of High Speed Rail
High-speed rail in China - Wikipedia
I remember when we used to mock China for being a backward nation. Over the last 20 years, China has invested heavily in modern infrastructure. High Speed Rail, solar and wind power, modernized power grids
Meanwhile, the US has sold out to supply side economics and has invested in tax cuts for billionaires
The US has control of its tax structure. Slashing taxes and expecting the private sector to pick up the slack has not worked
China still has a heavy reliance on coal. But unlike the US, they realize they need to move away from coal
It is China, not the US that leads the world in solar power research. The US just laughs and says Drill Baby, Drill
the GOP is invested in not investing in any rail because .... train travel makes zero sense in flyover country, with a few exceptions.
But the GOP is never going to invest in commuting trains from NYC to Conn, or even DC to NYC, because they're blue. Christie and Trump even cut train travel from NJ to NYC, and THAT is fucking busy. And that is where the major ridership is.
I'm all for not burning hydrocarbons when it's not necessary and not cost effective. But people will want to do what is most convenient for themselves, and as a Brit once said "you Americans love your motorcars." I'm leery of any high speed because the major problem with trains is their coexisting with cars. The roads are already there. But I posted before that a lot of time savings can be had with express trains in urban areas that just don't do local stops.
I don't see why private trains are inherently better than public. Air travel would not exist without public funding of airports and flight control and security. When there's competition for passengers, competition probably keeps costs down, and people would rather be packed like lemmings than pay more.
Right now, the only economically viable rail lines are the Northeast corridor.
The Acela is what we hold up as “high speed rail”. It is 1970s technology.
Well I think Chi - NYC turns a profit. But by and large I agree, and that's really the point. Our kids will be dead before there's any chance we'll embrace long distance train travel. But it makes a lot of sense it it's an alternative to being in traffic gridlock or a short flight where the time of getting to the airport and ticketing, security, waiting to take off ..... way outweighs the actual airtime. One can take a train from NYC to Philly in about an hour, with is wayyyyy better than driving. And that's just an express and not high speed.
I just don't know that a train going 100mph if feasible in the NE and the ridership isn't there for long hauls.
But for the gop/Trumpbots to piss all over train travel is typically .... stupid, ignorant and they're buying shit from elitists who have a money interest in keeping them ignorant and stupid.