Hillary Clinton’s problem isn’t Bernie Sanders. It’s Hillary Clinton

[Hossfly]

Haha lol clinton is dumb.

• 

 

[Hossfly]

No matter what you think about Hillary Clinton as the presidential primaries wind down, there is one undeniable fact that lingers in the background. Despite having had enormous advantages from the start of the campaign—no serious competition from within the party, solid support from national party leaders, a massive war chest and a nationwide grassroots network built over the course of decades in national politics—Clinton has struggled to put away a 74-year-old Jewish socialist who has had almost no establishment support.

Say whatever you want about Clinton’s lengthy résumé—and her credentials are indeed impressive—her performance this primary season is hardly indicative of a strong candidate.

Indeed, Clinton concedes that she’s not a natural politician, lacking the charm of her husband or the charisma of Barack Obama. But what should be troubling to those who hope to see a Democrat in the White House next year is that Clinton seems to suggest that this weakness isn’t problematic, that her résumé and policy-wonk reputation will be enough to carry her on Election Day.

Maybe. But don’t be too sure.

Look no further than the 2000 election, when another policy-wonk Democrat with little charm or charisma—Al Gore—failed to ride his impressive credentials to the White House. Gore, a two-term vice president with prior lengthy service in both the Senate and House, lost to an anti-intellectual GOP opponent with no Washington experience. Sound familiar?

Many Democrats are having difficulty accepting the fact that Clinton, despite her résumé, is a weak politician. In this state of denial, their defense of Clinton becomes aggressive, as they lash out at Bernie Sanders for staying in the race, implying that Clinton has earned the right to glide to the finish line unopposed.

A prime example of this Clinton-entitlement mentality can be found in a recent Boston Globe column by Michael A. Cohen, entitled “Bernie Sanders declares war on reality.” Cohen insists that Sanders is “illogical, self-serving, hypocritical” and “intellectually dishonest” in trying win the nomination by swaying superdelegates away from Clinton. “Instead of coming to grips with the overwhelming evidence that Democratic primary voters prefer Hillary Clinton to be the party’s 2016 presidential nominee,” Cohen writes, “Sanders continues to create his own political reality.”

Unfortunately, Cohen ignores the fact that the “overwhelming evidence” isn’t strong enough to allow Clinton to claim the nomination with pledged delegates alone. Had the evidence been so overwhelming, courting superdelegates would be irrelevant. Because Clinton has been far from dominating in the primaries and caucuses, the true “political reality” is that she will need superdelegate support to secure the nomination. Fortunately for Clinton, she appears to have the support of an overwhelming majority of superdelegates, but those allegiances can change up until the time of the convention vote, so Sanders is alive as long as the race comes down to a fight over them.

This is one weak nominee: Hillary Clinton’s problem isn’t Bernie Sanders. It’s Hillary Clinton

salon?

She's finished. Like every other female psychopath.

There's no postmen to boost you now, hag.

Betting against Clinton is like betting the sun won't rise. Don't.

And Hillary is Hillary's problem. That doesn't mean she isn't the next President.

Hillary's Problem Is When She Talks

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

No matter what you think about Hillary Clinton as the presidential primaries wind down, there is one undeniable fact that lingers in the background. Despite having had enormous advantages from the start of the campaign—no serious competition from within the party, solid support from national party leaders, a massive war chest and a nationwide grassroots network built over the course of decades in national politics—Clinton has struggled to put away a 74-year-old Jewish socialist who has had almost no establishment support.

Say whatever you want about Clinton’s lengthy résumé—and her credentials are indeed impressive—her performance this primary season is hardly indicative of a strong candidate.

Indeed, Clinton concedes that she’s not a natural politician, lacking the charm of her husband or the charisma of Barack Obama. But what should be troubling to those who hope to see a Democrat in the White House next year is that Clinton seems to suggest that this weakness isn’t problematic, that her résumé and policy-wonk reputation will be enough to carry her on Election Day.

Maybe. But don’t be too sure.

Look no further than the 2000 election, when another policy-wonk Democrat with little charm or charisma—Al Gore—failed to ride his impressive credentials to the White House. Gore, a two-term vice president with prior lengthy service in both the Senate and House, lost to an anti-intellectual GOP opponent with no Washington experience. Sound familiar?

Many Democrats are having difficulty accepting the fact that Clinton, despite her résumé, is a weak politician. In this state of denial, their defense of Clinton becomes aggressive, as they lash out at Bernie Sanders for staying in the race, implying that Clinton has earned the right to glide to the finish line unopposed.

A prime example of this Clinton-entitlement mentality can be found in a recent Boston Globe column by Michael A. Cohen, entitled “Bernie Sanders declares war on reality.” Cohen insists that Sanders is “illogical, self-serving, hypocritical” and “intellectually dishonest” in trying win the nomination by swaying superdelegates away from Clinton. “Instead of coming to grips with the overwhelming evidence that Democratic primary voters prefer Hillary Clinton to be the party’s 2016 presidential nominee,” Cohen writes, “Sanders continues to create his own political reality.”

Unfortunately, Cohen ignores the fact that the “overwhelming evidence” isn’t strong enough to allow Clinton to claim the nomination with pledged delegates alone. Had the evidence been so overwhelming, courting superdelegates would be irrelevant. Because Clinton has been far from dominating in the primaries and caucuses, the true “political reality” is that she will need superdelegate support to secure the nomination. Fortunately for Clinton, she appears to have the support of an overwhelming majority of superdelegates, but those allegiances can change up until the time of the convention vote, so Sanders is alive as long as the race comes down to a fight over them.

This is one weak nominee: Hillary Clinton’s problem isn’t Bernie Sanders. It’s Hillary Clinton

salon?

She's finished. Like every other female psychopath.

There's no postmen to boost you now, hag.

No, it's Bernie.
Offers of free health care
free college
bringing jobs that don't exist anymore back
Revolution against the obstructionist GOP

I can understand why his fantasy agenda is attractive.

Offers free healthcare (somebody is going to have to pay for it or put us in more debt.)

Free college (Somebody else is going to have to pay for it or put us in more debt.)

Bringing jobs back that don't exist anymore (Sure industry will love coming back to this country when they are taxed so high for all of Bernie's "free" stuff that they'll be banging down the doors of our borders; not to mention a much higher minimum wage)

You people on the left really live in fantasy land.

 

[JoeB131]

Offers free healthcare (somebody is going to have to pay for it or put us in more debt.)

Nonsense. You see, the thing is, someone is ALREADY paying for their health care. The real problem is that in your profit-driven system, we spend 17% of our GDP on health care while other industrialized nations with single payer spend 8-11%. Take out the non-value added things like payments to stockholders and 9-figure salaries to insurance company CEO's, and health care becomes amazingly affordable.

Free college (Somebody else is going to have to pay for it or put us in more debt.)

Or we can just crack down on the universities and make it affordable.

Bringing jobs back that don't exist anymore (Sure industry will love coming back to this country when they are taxed so high for all of Bernie's "free" stuff that they'll be banging down the doors of our borders; not to mention a much higher minimum wage)

when they find they can't sell stuff here without paying huge tariffs, huge taxes unless they've also made it here, not a problem.

Guy, I don't know who the winner in this election is going to be, but Free Trade is already the loser.

 

[dannyboys]

You what the sad truth is.

Even after no mainstream or popular democrat challenged her in the primaries, and the fact that the GOPnhas gone and nominated a realityvTV rodeo clown.........

.....there is still a significant chance that Hillary will not win.

The polls between Hillary and the orange faced bozo are starting to tighten and we are not,officially in the generals.

So what does that say about Hillary, The DEM Chosen One' who can't get the support of millennials who would rather vote for a 74 year old nutter?
And who looks like she can't bet your 'rodeo clown'?
Pretty fucking pathetic for the DNC.
Debbie told Biden and Warren, who really did have a serious chance of getting a decisive win in Nov. to fuck off. Their help was not needed.
By election day the polls will have Trump up over Hillary, if she's still in the race, by twenty points.
You read it here asshole.

 

[Stephanie]

ran across this. they want to keep this hidden from the people so they continually harp on Republicans are the hated blaa blaa blaa

snip:

Just a reminder: Hillary is an awful candidate whose own party can’t stand her

By Herman Cain -- Bio and Archives May 15, 2016

Here’s something that barely made the headlines: In last week’s West Virginia primary, Bernie Sanders defeated Hillary Clinton. That’s because it’s hardly news anymore when Bernie Sanders defeats Hillary Clinton in a primary. He defeats her regularly. Thus far he’s defeated her in 19 primaries and/or caucuses, which means she’d done an awful lot of losing for someone who is supposed to be the massively supported, consensus, inevitable nominee of her party.

This doesn’t mean he’s going to be the Democrats’ nominee, of course. The Democrats’ nominating process is set up to favor the candidate preferred by the establishment, not by primary voters and caucus-goers. They get some say, but just in case the establishment’s candidate is widely reviled and distrusted, the Democrats have made sure she will be saved by “superdelegates” who will vote the way party leaders want them to, not the way voters want them to.

all of it here:
Just a reminder: Hillary is an awful candidate whose own party can’t stand her

 

[dannyboys]

No matter what you think about Hillary Clinton as the presidential primaries wind down, there is one undeniable fact that lingers in the background. Despite having had enormous advantages from the start of the campaign—no serious competition from within the party, solid support from national party leaders, a massive war chest and a nationwide grassroots network built over the course of decades in national politics—Clinton has struggled to put away a 74-year-old Jewish socialist who has had almost no establishment support.

Say whatever you want about Clinton’s lengthy résumé—and her credentials are indeed impressive—her performance this primary season is hardly indicative of a strong candidate.

Indeed, Clinton concedes that she’s not a natural politician, lacking the charm of her husband or the charisma of Barack Obama. But what should be troubling to those who hope to see a Democrat in the White House next year is that Clinton seems to suggest that this weakness isn’t problematic, that her résumé and policy-wonk reputation will be enough to carry her on Election Day.

Maybe. But don’t be too sure.

Look no further than the 2000 election, when another policy-wonk Democrat with little charm or charisma—Al Gore—failed to ride his impressive credentials to the White House. Gore, a two-term vice president with prior lengthy service in both the Senate and House, lost to an anti-intellectual GOP opponent with no Washington experience. Sound familiar?

Many Democrats are having difficulty accepting the fact that Clinton, despite her résumé, is a weak politician. In this state of denial, their defense of Clinton becomes aggressive, as they lash out at Bernie Sanders for staying in the race, implying that Clinton has earned the right to glide to the finish line unopposed.

A prime example of this Clinton-entitlement mentality can be found in a recent Boston Globe column by Michael A. Cohen, entitled “Bernie Sanders declares war on reality.” Cohen insists that Sanders is “illogical, self-serving, hypocritical” and “intellectually dishonest” in trying win the nomination by swaying superdelegates away from Clinton. “Instead of coming to grips with the overwhelming evidence that Democratic primary voters prefer Hillary Clinton to be the party’s 2016 presidential nominee,” Cohen writes, “Sanders continues to create his own political reality.”

Unfortunately, Cohen ignores the fact that the “overwhelming evidence” isn’t strong enough to allow Clinton to claim the nomination with pledged delegates alone. Had the evidence been so overwhelming, courting superdelegates would be irrelevant. Because Clinton has been far from dominating in the primaries and caucuses, the true “political reality” is that she will need superdelegate support to secure the nomination. Fortunately for Clinton, she appears to have the support of an overwhelming majority of superdelegates, but those allegiances can change up until the time of the convention vote, so Sanders is alive as long as the race comes down to a fight over them.

This is one weak nominee: Hillary Clinton’s problem isn’t Bernie Sanders. It’s Hillary Clinton

salon?

She's finished. Like every other female psychopath.

There's no postmen to boost you now, hag.

Betting against Clinton is like betting the sun won't rise. Don't.

And Hillary is Hillary's problem. That doesn't mean she isn't the next President.

I'm thinking Hillary is also a "problem" for Debbie and the entire DNC war machine.
Seems like they made some pretty fucked up assumptions about the American voting population.
When an "orange faced rodeo clown gets the most Rep Primaries votes in US history...........and still counting, the DNC might be wise to start looking for Biden's phone number on the Rolodex before it's too late.

 

[The VOR]

ran across this. they want to keep this hidden from the people so they continually harp on Republicans are the hated blaa blaa blaa

snip:

Just a reminder: Hillary is an awful candidate whose own party can’t stand her

By Herman Cain -- Bio and Archives May 15, 2016

Here’s something that barely made the headlines: In last week’s West Virginia primary, Bernie Sanders defeated Hillary Clinton. That’s because it’s hardly news anymore when Bernie Sanders defeats Hillary Clinton in a primary. He defeats her regularly. Thus far he’s defeated her in 19 primaries and/or caucuses, which means she’d done an awful lot of losing for someone who is supposed to be the massively supported, consensus, inevitable nominee of her party.

This doesn’t mean he’s going to be the Democrats’ nominee, of course. The Democrats’ nominating process is set up to favor the candidate preferred by the establishment, not by primary voters and caucus-goers. They get some say, but just in case the establishment’s candidate is widely reviled and distrusted, the Democrats have made sure she will be saved by “superdelegates” who will vote the way party leaders want them to, not the way voters want them to.

all of it here:
Just a reminder: Hillary is an awful candidate whose own party can’t stand her

Herman Cain, are you serious? ROTFLMAO.

 

[longknife]

 

[Dot Com]

The flawed candidate/Goldman puppet will be short work for Trump if she is the nominee:

The New York Times: Little Is Off Limits as Trump Plans Attacks on Clinton. http://google.com/newsstand/s/CBIwioaJ6yo

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

 

[Dot Com]

Haha lol clinton is dumb.

• 

ummm..... thanks for sharing..... NOT!!!

I'm not a hiLIARy- supporter but you people dont do your side any good w/ posts like that

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

 

[Hossfly]

Haha lol clinton is dumb.

• 

ummm..... thanks for sharing..... NOT!!!

I'm not a hiLIARy- supporter but you people dont do your side any good w/ posts like that

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

This one is better.

 

[Fair&Balanced]

IF Bernie had went for the throat early , he would have won by now.

He should have hammered her over the email "security review" and then insisted that she was obviously a racist who hated Jews when she fought back.

 

[Dot Com]

Haha lol clinton is dumb.

• 

ummm..... thanks for sharing..... NOT!!!

I'm not a hiLIARy- supporter but you people dont do your side any good w/ posts like that

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

This one is better.

I figured you out!!! You have CDS!!!

What a sore rw tosser you are

 

[Redfish]

her credentials are indeed impressive—.

In her case, it’s all it will take to beat Drumpf. There is nothing he can say about her (truthfully anyway which isn’t a barrier for him or his supporters of course) that isn’t already known.

Wrong. You can keep repeating that to comfort yourself BUT the fact is that most Americans haven't payed much attention and the MSM has swept anything negative about Hillary under the rug WHILE hammering Trump as much as they possibly can.

When we finally get the show on the road and Hillary is FINALLY criticized for what she really is the middle roaders will see her differently. The Bernie supporters will be pissed and those on the right will be saying "told ya so."

If she was a he and a cousin of Bill's no one would vote for, let's say a Hillard Clinton. All she has is her gender, the first woman president, how lame. Impressive credentials my ass.

and she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary----------------oops, forgot. another Hillary lie.

 

[Valerie]

hillary's biggest "problem" remains partisan derangement syndrome.

partisans' biggest problem is that elections don't occur in deranged echo chambers.

meanwhile MILLIONS MORE individual Americans voted for hillary than ANY OTHER candidate in the primaries.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No matter what you think about Hillary Clinton as the presidential primaries wind down, there is one undeniable fact that lingers in the background. Despite having had enormous advantages from the start of the campaign—no serious competition from within the party, solid support from national party leaders, a massive war chest and a nationwide grassroots network built over the course of decades in national politics—Clinton has struggled to put away a 74-year-old Jewish socialist who has had almost no establishment support.

Say whatever you want about Clinton’s lengthy résumé—and her credentials are indeed impressive—her performance this primary season is hardly indicative of a strong candidate.

Indeed, Clinton concedes that she’s not a natural politician, lacking the charm of her husband or the charisma of Barack Obama. But what should be troubling to those who hope to see a Democrat in the White House next year is that Clinton seems to suggest that this weakness isn’t problematic, that her résumé and policy-wonk reputation will be enough to carry her on Election Day.

Maybe. But don’t be too sure.

Look no further than the 2000 election, when another policy-wonk Democrat with little charm or charisma—Al Gore—failed to ride his impressive credentials to the White House. Gore, a two-term vice president with prior lengthy service in both the Senate and House, lost to an anti-intellectual GOP opponent with no Washington experience. Sound familiar?

Many Democrats are having difficulty accepting the fact that Clinton, despite her résumé, is a weak politician. In this state of denial, their defense of Clinton becomes aggressive, as they lash out at Bernie Sanders for staying in the race, implying that Clinton has earned the right to glide to the finish line unopposed.

A prime example of this Clinton-entitlement mentality can be found in a recent Boston Globe column by Michael A. Cohen, entitled “Bernie Sanders declares war on reality.” Cohen insists that Sanders is “illogical, self-serving, hypocritical” and “intellectually dishonest” in trying win the nomination by swaying superdelegates away from Clinton. “Instead of coming to grips with the overwhelming evidence that Democratic primary voters prefer Hillary Clinton to be the party’s 2016 presidential nominee,” Cohen writes, “Sanders continues to create his own political reality.”

Unfortunately, Cohen ignores the fact that the “overwhelming evidence” isn’t strong enough to allow Clinton to claim the nomination with pledged delegates alone. Had the evidence been so overwhelming, courting superdelegates would be irrelevant. Because Clinton has been far from dominating in the primaries and caucuses, the true “political reality” is that she will need superdelegate support to secure the nomination. Fortunately for Clinton, she appears to have the support of an overwhelming majority of superdelegates, but those allegiances can change up until the time of the convention vote, so Sanders is alive as long as the race comes down to a fight over them.

This is one weak nominee: Hillary Clinton’s problem isn’t Bernie Sanders. It’s Hillary Clinton

salon?

She's finished. Like every other female psychopath.

There's no postmen to boost you now, hag.

She looks in the mirror and sees Bill except she's an awful liar

 

[Iceweasel]

partisans' biggest problem is that elections don't occur in deranged echo chambers.

meanwhile MILLIONS MORE individual Americans voted for hillary than ANY OTHER candidate in the primaries.

You're railing against partisans but ignore the fact that Republicans had 17 candidates.

LOL

 

[Hossfly]

Haha lol clinton is dumb.

• 

ummm..... thanks for sharing..... NOT!!!

I'm not a hiLIARy- supporter but you people dont do your side any good w/ posts like that

Sent from my VS415PP using Tapatalk

This one is better.

I figured you out!!! You have CDS!!!

What a sore rw tosser you are

I've had CDS since 1969 while in Vietnam and Clinton was protesting and handing out anti-war and anti-American literature in the streets of London. Long haired coke sniffing draft dodging piece of dog shit. Thing is, Bill picked up those nasty habits from that coke sniffing carpet munching piece of cat shit he married.

 

[Dot Com]

Can you say that in adult English w/o the potty words?