Hillary Favorability Drops to Lowest Since 2008 - Gallup Poll

[Sarah G]

It'll continue to drop as she appears more in front of cameras. That shrill voice and irritating cackle, along with her arrogance and condescending attitude, not to mention her lack of accomplishments (ever) will sink her. The only thing she has ever done is be near by while somebody else was governing. She's never done shit herself.

Again, who on the Right can beat her. Her closest threat is Chris Christie and not all that many Republicans even trust him. You've got nothin.

If she runs, she will take the presidency.

 

[Sarah G]

Nobody, nothing ...

 

[The Rabbi]

It'll continue to drop as she appears more in front of cameras. That shrill voice and irritating cackle, along with her arrogance and condescending attitude, not to mention her lack of accomplishments (ever) will sink her. The only thing she has ever done is be near by while somebody else was governing. She's never done shit herself.

I'd be curious to see her unfavorability ratings, which have always been higher than anyone else's. Yes the fact that she is not polling higher at this point should be troubling, because as soon as she starts campaigning and has to take specific stances on issues she will alienate some voters. Now she's all things to all people.

 

[The Rabbi]

It'll continue to drop as she appears more in front of cameras. That shrill voice and irritating cackle, along with her arrogance and condescending attitude, not to mention her lack of accomplishments (ever) will sink her. The only thing she has ever done is be near by while somebody else was governing. She's never done shit herself.

Again, who on the Right can beat her. Her closest threat is Chris Christie and not all that many Republicans even trust him. You've got nothin.

If she runs, she will take the presidency.

Christie won't run. If he does he wont get the nomination. The GOP is fed up with RINOs.
Virtually anyone talked about now would beat her. Hillary is old with no new ideas, just more of the same failed policies of the last 6 years. People vote for fresh young upbeat candidates with new ideas.

 

[Esmeralda]

America isn't going to elect a frail older woman in these tough times.

John McCain was 72 years old when he ran for President. Ms Clinton is 66 now and will be 68 if she runs in 2 years. That means she would be President for 4 years before she gets to the age McCain was when he ran for President, when the GOP nominated him as their candidate.

So, it seems Republicans are talking out of both sides of their mouths: a double standard. What is okay for a GOP candidate, regarding age, isn't okay for a Democratic candidate. Your attitude about her age is completely hypocritical, and it doesn't wash as a reason for her not to run.

 

[Esmeralda]

It'll continue to drop as she appears more in front of cameras. That shrill voice and irritating cackle, along with her arrogance and condescending attitude, not to mention her lack of accomplishments (ever) will sink her. The only thing she has ever done is be near by while somebody else was governing. She's never done shit herself.

Again, who on the Right can beat her. Her closest threat is Chris Christie and not all that many Republicans even trust him. You've got nothin.

If she runs, she will take the presidency.

Christie won't run. If he does he wont get the nomination. The GOP is fed up with RINOs.
Virtually anyone talked about now would beat her. Hillary is old with no new ideas, just more of the same failed policies of the last 6 years. People vote for fresh young upbeat candidates with new ideas.

LMAO Oh the irony. That's why people voted for Obama: fresh, young, upbeat. And now so many feel it was a mistake. Are Americans too obtuse to realize it's not the best idea to vote for someone just because they are young, fresh, upbeat, AND, untried? Mrs Clinton has experience, lots of national and international experience. That's important.

 

[The Rabbi]

Again, who on the Right can beat her. Her closest threat is Chris Christie and not all that many Republicans even trust him. You've got nothin.

If she runs, she will take the presidency.

Christie won't run. If he does he wont get the nomination. The GOP is fed up with RINOs.
Virtually anyone talked about now would beat her. Hillary is old with no new ideas, just more of the same failed policies of the last 6 years. People vote for fresh young upbeat candidates with new ideas.

LMAO Oh the irony. That's why people voted for Obama: fresh, young, upbeat. And now so many feel it was a mistake. Are Americans too obtuse to realize it's not the best idea to vote for someone just because they are young, fresh, upbeat, AND, untried? Mrs Clinton has experience, lots of national and international experience. That's important.

Yes they are that stupid. As you point out.
Clinton has little to no experience, other than in lying about stuff. And she has no accomplishments either.

 

[S.J.]

Again, who on the Right can beat her. Her closest threat is Chris Christie and not all that many Republicans even trust him. You've got nothin.

If she runs, she will take the presidency.

Christie won't run. If he does he wont get the nomination. The GOP is fed up with RINOs.
Virtually anyone talked about now would beat her. Hillary is old with no new ideas, just more of the same failed policies of the last 6 years. People vote for fresh young upbeat candidates with new ideas.

LMAO Oh the irony. That's why people voted for Obama: fresh, young, upbeat. And now so many feel it was a mistake. Are Americans too obtuse to realize it's not the best idea to vote for someone just because they are young, fresh, upbeat, AND, untried? Mrs Clinton has experience, lots of national and international experience. That's important.

Experience at what, failing? Name one accomplishment.

 

[Esmeralda]

Hillary Clinton remains popular for her time as secretary of state, viewed apart from Obama - The Washington Post

Michael Hirsh | Hillary Clinton's Legacy as Secretary of State | Foreign Affairs

There are many articles where you can find a discussion of her legacy as Secretary of State. She is considered, by those without the negative GOP bias, a competent Secretary of State whose diplomacy regained the respect around the world that Bush lost for America.

You keep harping that there is no one great accomplishment: but there are a thousand small ones, more subtle than those of your ilk seem to understand. Both as a full term senator and 4 year Secretary of State, she accomplished much and in the Senate, was respected by her colleagues, while as the leader of diplomacy for our country, she was respected by countries around the world.

It's similar to the rabbit and the hare. You think the rabbit is the winner when it is really the hare.

 

[Sallow]

Since right-wing Republicans don't have any good ideas on how to make America better, they have to rip it apart (and kill cops) until everything else in America sucks so much that the Republicans look good by comparison. What Republicans don't understand is that the rest of America is watching the GOP tear this country apart to try to make the GOP look good, and We the People don't appreciate it.

Three in 10 Voters Say They Will Vote to Oppose Obama

It's liberal democrat voters who write songs abput killing cops.

And it's the Tea Party who actually DO kill cops.

 

[The Rabbi]

Hillary Clinton remains popular for her time as secretary of state, viewed apart from Obama - The Washington Post

Michael Hirsh | Hillary Clinton's Legacy as Secretary of State | Foreign Affairs

There are many articles where you can find a discussion of her legacy as Secretary of State. She is considered, by those without the negative GOP bias, a competent Secretary of State whose diplomacy regained the respect around the world that Bush lost for America.

You keep harping that there is no one great accomplishment: but there are a thousand small ones, more subtle than those of your ilk seem to understand. Both as a full term senator and 4 year Secretary of State, she accomplished much and in the Senate, was respected by her colleagues, while as the leader of diplomacy for our country, she was respected by countries around the world.

It's similar to the rabbit and the hare. You think the rabbit is the winner when it is really the hare.

Yeah you should try reading your own links before posting.

But neither Obama’s gratitude nor Clinton’s graciousness should cloud history’s judgment. By any standard measure of diplomacy, Clinton will be remembered as a highly competent secretary of state, but not a great one. Despite her considerable star power around the world, her popularity at home, and her reputation for being on the right side of most issues, she left office without a signature doctrine, strategy, or diplomatic triumph. It is a stretch to include Clinton in the company of John Quincy Adams, George Marshall, Dean Acheson, and Henry Kissinger -- some of the great secretaries of state who profoundly changed U.S. foreign policy. Although she has avoided all talk of what comes next, it may well be that Clinton’s tenure as diplomat in chief will someday be viewed as a steppingstone to the presidency, as it was for Thomas Jefferson and Adams.

She did nothign but tour around relying on her "star power". Same reason she is running for President.

 

[Esmeralda]

Hillary Clinton remains popular for her time as secretary of state, viewed apart from Obama - The Washington Post

Michael Hirsh | Hillary Clinton's Legacy as Secretary of State | Foreign Affairs

There are many articles where you can find a discussion of her legacy as Secretary of State. She is considered, by those without the negative GOP bias, a competent Secretary of State whose diplomacy regained the respect around the world that Bush lost for America.

You keep harping that there is no one great accomplishment: but there are a thousand small ones, more subtle than those of your ilk seem to understand. Both as a full term senator and 4 year Secretary of State, she accomplished much and in the Senate, was respected by her colleagues, while as the leader of diplomacy for our country, she was respected by countries around the world.

It's similar to the rabbit and the hare. You think the rabbit is the winner when it is really the hare.

Yeah you should try reading your own links before posting.

But neither Obama’s gratitude nor Clinton’s graciousness should cloud history’s judgment. By any standard measure of diplomacy, Clinton will be remembered as a highly competent secretary of state, but not a great one. Despite her considerable star power around the world, her popularity at home, and her reputation for being on the right side of most issues, she left office without a signature doctrine, strategy, or diplomatic triumph. It is a stretch to include Clinton in the company of John Quincy Adams, George Marshall, Dean Acheson, and Henry Kissinger -- some of the great secretaries of state who profoundly changed U.S. foreign policy. Although she has avoided all talk of what comes next, it may well be that Clinton’s tenure as diplomat in chief will someday be viewed as a steppingstone to the presidency, as it was for Thomas Jefferson and Adams.

She did nothign but tour around relying on her "star power". Same reason she is running for President.

Boy, that's some biased selective reading skills you got there.

Oh, and btw, if she runs for president, it isn't on star power but because the democrats think she is the best person to do the job. Who have your guys got? LMAO

 

[candycorn]

It'll continue to drop as she appears more in front of cameras. That shrill voice and irritating cackle, along with her arrogance and condescending attitude, not to mention her lack of accomplishments (ever) will sink her. The only thing she has ever done is be near by while somebody else was governing. She's never done shit herself.

I'd be curious to see her unfavorability ratings, which have always been higher than anyone else's. Yes the fact that she is not polling higher at this point should be troubling, because as soon as she starts campaigning and has to take specific stances on issues she will alienate some voters. Now she's all things to all people.

From Amazon.com

Amazon Author Rank:
#9 Overall (See top 100 authors)
#1 in Kindle eBooks > History
#1 in Books > History
#1 in Books > Biographies & Memoirs
#1 in Kindle eBooks > Biographies & Memoirs
#9 in Books

Hillary is plenty successful and well liked.

 

[editec]

Cons are scared to death of Hillary.

So is the REAL left, Lakhota.

 

[Meister]

It'll continue to drop as she appears more in front of cameras. That shrill voice and irritating cackle, along with her arrogance and condescending attitude, not to mention her lack of accomplishments (ever) will sink her. The only thing she has ever done is be near by while somebody else was governing. She's never done shit herself.

Yep, and we've already seen her 3am phone call.

If she does run she shouldn't do the debates, it'll ruin her.


She's no Bill Clinton, and I'm sure none of her former staffers from the White House would vote for her.

 

[Seawytch]

Get real folks, she looks tired just talking about thinking about running for the most stressful job in the world.

America isn't going to elect a frail older woman in these tough times. She's as electable as Eric Cartman of South Park. And if the GOP runs Christie, i seriously don't see how the dems can take 2016. They should just concede right now with that albatross that refuses to let go of their necks.. [no, I'm not talking about Hillary, it's one of "their" platforms]

Then why did the Republicans nominate Reagan and Mccain, who were both older?

Don't forget Romney. Romney and Hillary were born the same year, 1947.

 

[Wildman]

Don't get me wrong I dislike Hillary intensely. That said Hillary is by far the best shot the Ds have. Gore acting out a psychotic symptom with his "invented the internet" hallucination on camera is next best and Biden third.

why do some, or most libertards always start out with,

"I dislike Hillary intensely...., BUT !"

"I despise her..., BUT !"

"I can not stand her..., BUT !"

"She is the best candidate..., BUT !"

and yes, she has a big butt, but that is because she is always on it, just like that big mooo cow colored butt in the WH

like the tea party, which is NOT really a "party", the dems need to turn lose of all their old worn out shysters, criminals, and wannabe's, start with some young demo nit wits who may have some new ideas...., hummmmm ! a thought just occurred to me.., maybe there aren't any young libs with new ideas and ideals !!



are there any ?

 

[BobPlumb]

Get real folks, she looks tired just talking about thinking about running for the most stressful job in the world.

America isn't going to elect a frail older woman in these tough times. She's as electable as Eric Cartman of South Park. And if the GOP runs Christie, i seriously don't see how the dems can take 2016. They should just concede right now with that albatross that refuses to let go of their necks.. [no, I'm not talking about Hillary, it's one of "their" platforms]

I wouldn't underestimate Eric Cartman or Hillary.

[ame=http://youtu.be/MIJKsXsJ4Pg]Cartman vs Scott Tenorman - YouTube[/ame]

 

[BobPlumb]

It'll continue to drop as she appears more in front of cameras. That shrill voice and irritating cackle, along with her arrogance and condescending attitude, not to mention her lack of accomplishments (ever) will sink her. The only thing she has ever done is be near by while somebody else was governing. She's never done shit herself.

Poor little First Lady.....she and Bill needed money to buy their HOUSES after Bill's terms as president was over. We need her to be president because she knows what it is like to be poor.

 

[natstew]

Before it's over she'll have a smidgen of Jew in her and 16th Indian.