Hillary is full of...

the you can toast us when we say madame president with the democrats in super majority in the congress ... the whining will be deafening ... when you walk in the parks you will hear a high pitch sound ... why that's republicans whining .... I can hear it now... little billye says, mommy whats that noise ??? well Billye, that's the sound of repub-lie-cans being forced to do the will of the people :woohoo:


dream on, take another hit on the crack pipe.
if any one is on crack that would be you and the rest of the right wing nut jobs here ... they totally ignore what the laws are... all they want to do is hear hillary talking dirty to bill

If she's done nothing wrong she shouldnt have a problem with handing over the server right?
its not a question of she did nothing wrong... the real question here is why should she have to give up her personal emails at the whims of you righties ... she doesn't ...she like the rest of us has the right to privacy ... there isn't any amount of whining from the right that can make her give them up
Nor should she or any of us....

What is it that the republican congress critters are looking for, what crime do they think she has committed, or is this just the pontificating grand standing AS USUAL for them?

Do you think our personal emails are as important to national security as State Department emails?

Get real!!!
 
Did Powell run for president? Did he use it for official business? Did he have his own server?
Yes he used his own private server instead of the gvts when he was Secretary of State for his govt/state dept emails and he said it is not illegal to do such.
Course he didn't delete his emails either, or did he? I don't remember them requesting his emails after he caused a bunch of his diplomates to get get killed because of lax security, and I don't remember there being any investigation inside the State Department over emails. Hillary claims she has the right to destroy evidence because her emails (30,000 of them) were deemed personal.
deleting her emails does not destroy them...there is always a backup somewhere.

Deleting is the same as destroying regardless if there are copies elsewhere. She is destroying evidence along with obstructing justice. If they find out that she destroyed evidence of wrongdoing she's going to be charged with a crime. Regardless, she doesn't have the right to decide what emails need to be turned over. The only reason it was discovered that she only used a private account was because somebody leaked it to the press and blew her cover.

I believe Sidney Blumenthal got hacked which led to Billary getting caught.
Who hacked Blumenthal?
 
and the whining begins ... as I said whiner, she doesn't have to show us any of her emails ... deal with it and stop your whining

She has to show the emails she sent under business of Sec of State.
Which SHE DID, didn't she send them all the emails they requested?

So what about all the missing emails? Are you really so dense as to believe she didnt use email for government business for months?
thats not the question ...the question is does she get to do the same thing republicans are doing this very minute ... where you believe she doesn't get the same right as you on the right are getting ... look at Scott walker ... look at chris christie ... they refused to give up their private emails ...shell I go on to all of the republicans that refuse to give up their private emails ??? or is it just only democrats get to give up their private emails ... if the government wants all emails by the government employeesl be turned over, then they need to pass a law stating that all emails from government employees be on government sites ... so far there isn't any law that say you must

Government emails are not private.
are you sure or are you just whining like the rest of your right wing nut jobs here
 
She has to show the emails she sent under business of Sec of State.
Which SHE DID, didn't she send them all the emails they requested?

So what about all the missing emails? Are you really so dense as to believe she didnt use email for government business for months?
thats not the question ...the question is does she get to do the same thing republicans are doing this very minute ... where you believe she doesn't get the same right as you on the right are getting ... look at Scott walker ... look at chris christie ... they refused to give up their private emails ...shell I go on to all of the republicans that refuse to give up their private emails ??? or is it just only democrats get to give up their private emails ... if the government wants all emails by the government employeesl be turned over, then they need to pass a law stating that all emails from government employees be on government sites ... so far there isn't any law that say you must

Government emails are not private.
are you sure or are you just whining like the rest of your right wing nut jobs here

If you have to ask.....
 
She has to show the emails she sent under business of Sec of State.
Which SHE DID, didn't she send them all the emails they requested?

So what about all the missing emails? Are you really so dense as to believe she didnt use email for government business for months?
thats not the question ...the question is does she get to do the same thing republicans are doing this very minute ... where you believe she doesn't get the same right as you on the right are getting ... look at Scott walker ... look at chris christie ... they refused to give up their private emails ...shell I go on to all of the republicans that refuse to give up their private emails ??? or is it just only democrats get to give up their private emails ... if the government wants all emails by the government employeesl be turned over, then they need to pass a law stating that all emails from government employees be on government sites ... so far there isn't any law that say you must

Government emails are not private.
are you sure or are you just whining like the rest of your right wing nut jobs here

You're a hysterical left loon, huh? If you read back through your own comments you'll see you keep stepping in your own pile
 
Yes he used his own private server instead of the gvts when he was Secretary of State for his govt/state dept emails and he said it is not illegal to do such.
Course he didn't delete his emails either, or did he? I don't remember them requesting his emails after he caused a bunch of his diplomates to get get killed because of lax security, and I don't remember there being any investigation inside the State Department over emails. Hillary claims she has the right to destroy evidence because her emails (30,000 of them) were deemed personal.
deleting her emails does not destroy them...there is always a backup somewhere.

Deleting is the same as destroying regardless if there are copies elsewhere. She is destroying evidence along with obstructing justice. If they find out that she destroyed evidence of wrongdoing she's going to be charged with a crime. Regardless, she doesn't have the right to decide what emails need to be turned over. The only reason it was discovered that she only used a private account was because somebody leaked it to the press and blew her cover.

I believe Sidney Blumenthal got hacked which led to Billary getting caught.
Who hacked Blumenthal?

Not sure,I missed that part.
 
dream on, take another hit on the crack pipe.
if any one is on crack that would be you and the rest of the right wing nut jobs here ... they totally ignore what the laws are... all they want to do is hear hillary talking dirty to bill

If she's done nothing wrong she shouldnt have a problem with handing over the server right?
its not a question of she did nothing wrong... the real question here is why should she have to give up her personal emails at the whims of you righties ... she doesn't ...she like the rest of us has the right to privacy ... there isn't any amount of whining from the right that can make her give them up
Nor should she or any of us....

What is it that the republican congress critters are looking for, what crime do they think she has committed, or is this just the pontificating grand standing AS USUAL for them?

Do you think our personal emails are as important to national security as State Department emails?

Get real!!!
Do you have any evidence that there was any kind of National security breach or are you FISHING? Casting a huge net, HOPING to find something, anything, just a smidgeon of something you can use politically against her should NOT be the reason for demanding someone to give up their personal emails....do you not KNOW the Constitution......?
 
if any one is on crack that would be you and the rest of the right wing nut jobs here ... they totally ignore what the laws are... all they want to do is hear hillary talking dirty to bill

If she's done nothing wrong she shouldnt have a problem with handing over the server right?
its not a question of she did nothing wrong... the real question here is why should she have to give up her personal emails at the whims of you righties ... she doesn't ...she like the rest of us has the right to privacy ... there isn't any amount of whining from the right that can make her give them up

She has to give up the emails regarding her duties as Sec of State. That' the law, and w/o the server there is no way of knowing if she released all those emails. She's trying to use "personal" to hide what she has to release.
kind of like what Scott walker did or Chris Christie did .. we still haven't been able to get those emails .. what do they have to hide??? closing down lanes illegally just to piss off a mayer or using campaign money for illegal activities ... is this what your trying to get done here ??? or is it only about degrading dems thats on your mind

You have selective outrage, you're upset over Walker and Christie but not Hillary? All govt emails should be made available
hun, it is you that has selective outrage here ...as I have been pointing out here ...not one of you have said that walker and christie shoud give up their emails ... all of you have said only hillary should be forced to give up her private emais ... it is you who suffers from selective outrage
 
if any one is on crack that would be you and the rest of the right wing nut jobs here ... they totally ignore what the laws are... all they want to do is hear hillary talking dirty to bill

If she's done nothing wrong she shouldnt have a problem with handing over the server right?
its not a question of she did nothing wrong... the real question here is why should she have to give up her personal emails at the whims of you righties ... she doesn't ...she like the rest of us has the right to privacy ... there isn't any amount of whining from the right that can make her give them up
Nor should she or any of us....

What is it that the republican congress critters are looking for, what crime do they think she has committed, or is this just the pontificating grand standing AS USUAL for them?

Do you think our personal emails are as important to national security as State Department emails?

Get real!!!
Do you have any evidence that there was any kind of National security breach or are you FISHING? Casting a huge net, HOPING to find something, anything, just a smidgeon of something you can use politically against her should NOT be the reason for demanding someone to give up their personal emails....do you not KNOW the Constitution......?

Doesnt matter. Government emails are not private.
 
If she's done nothing wrong she shouldnt have a problem with handing over the server right?
its not a question of she did nothing wrong... the real question here is why should she have to give up her personal emails at the whims of you righties ... she doesn't ...she like the rest of us has the right to privacy ... there isn't any amount of whining from the right that can make her give them up

She has to give up the emails regarding her duties as Sec of State. That' the law, and w/o the server there is no way of knowing if she released all those emails. She's trying to use "personal" to hide what she has to release.
kind of like what Scott walker did or Chris Christie did .. we still haven't been able to get those emails .. what do they have to hide??? closing down lanes illegally just to piss off a mayer or using campaign money for illegal activities ... is this what your trying to get done here ??? or is it only about degrading dems thats on your mind

You have selective outrage, you're upset over Walker and Christie but not Hillary? All govt emails should be made available
hun, it is you that has selective outrage here ...as I have been pointing out here ...not one of you have said that walker and christie shoud give up their emails ... all of you have said only hillary should be forced to give up her private emais ... it is you who suffers from selective outrage

I'm not your "hun" moon bat
 
Yes he used his own private server instead of the gvts when he was Secretary of State for his govt/state dept emails and he said it is not illegal to do such.
Course he didn't delete his emails either, or did he? I don't remember them requesting his emails after he caused a bunch of his diplomates to get get killed because of lax security, and I don't remember there being any investigation inside the State Department over emails. Hillary claims she has the right to destroy evidence because her emails (30,000 of them) were deemed personal.
deleting her emails does not destroy them...there is always a backup somewhere.

Deleting is the same as destroying regardless if there are copies elsewhere. She is destroying evidence along with obstructing justice. If they find out that she destroyed evidence of wrongdoing she's going to be charged with a crime. Regardless, she doesn't have the right to decide what emails need to be turned over. The only reason it was discovered that she only used a private account was because somebody leaked it to the press and blew her cover.

I believe Sidney Blumenthal got hacked which led to Billary getting caught.
Who hacked Blumenthal?

Here you go..
Apparently it was Guccifer.
Hacked e-mails indicate that Hillary Clinton used a domain registered the day of her Senate hearings - The Washington Post
 
you know, its quite DUMB of the Republican Congress Critters to think they have not already played their hand on this email issue.... The boy cried wolf story comes to mind....

they have spent millions of my tax dollars and your tax dollars with their dog and pony shows on the irs/lois learner emails OF WHICH NOT ONE OF THEM... even NOW, after they have recovered many more of them, incriminates Lois Learner or the white house or anyone of criminal or collusion actions..... but but bu bu but....there are still some more missing, IT'S IN THEM, for SURE.... :rolleyes:

This, "What is in the ones that are missing, it must be illegal doings BULL CRUD" can only tantalize the masses for soooo long, until they are "on to you"!

These congress critters have no credibility at this point, for anyone with eyes to see... we know the games they play, the pontificating for political posturing, the grandstanding like the letter to Iran leaders, the dog and pony shows..... they don't have much credibility left as far as I am concerned....

Speaking of scams at taxpayers expense:

  1. Fast & Furious
  2. Man-made climate change
  3. Trayvon Martin investigation
  4. Ferguson civil rights investigation
  5. Executive amnesty for illegals
  6. DACA
  7. Unilateral Iranian nuclear negotiations
  8. Monetizing the dept
 

Wait a minute..according to you liberals it wasnt a law when billary did it.
You need to brush up on your calender reading skills.
you need to brush up on the laws too ... its always been that government servers must be handed over ... he didn't do that... but that's ok ... we understand ...he's a repub-lie-can ... they don't have to follow the law
 

Wait a minute..according to you liberals it wasnt a law when billary did it.
You need to brush up on your calender reading skills.
you need to brush up on the laws too ... its always been that government servers must be handed over ... he didn't do that... but that's ok ... we understand ...he's a repub-lie-can ... they don't have to follow the law

Not what hillary is claiming.
 
We just have to take her word that she never transmitted classified information on her server. No discussions with the president (classified), no talking about her schedule (classified), nothing to do with private discussions with foreign dignitaries (classified).

Did she ever do her job, or was she just greasing everyone for donations? Nigeria paid her foundation half a billion. I wonder what they expected in return?
I'm sure she had plenty of conversations with the president and others in the state dept.... So did Colin Powell using his private SECURE server.

Which means she transmitted classified information, which means she's lying about never doing so on her account.

She claimed her server was at home yet the IP address is listed at an office in New York. She claimed she followed the law, but she destroyed documents she was told to turn over. And she claimed she never transmitted classified information, but if this is her only email account then this most likely is total Bullshit as well.
What? they told her to turn over her private emails? Really? Why? For what reason does congress critters want her private emails?
 
We just have to take her word that she never transmitted classified information on her server. No discussions with the president (classified), no talking about her schedule (classified), nothing to do with private discussions with foreign dignitaries (classified).

Did she ever do her job, or was she just greasing everyone for donations? Nigeria paid her foundation half a billion. I wonder what they expected in return?
I'm sure she had plenty of conversations with the president and others in the state dept.... So did Colin Powell using his private SECURE server.

Which means she transmitted classified information, which means she's lying about never doing so on her account.

She claimed her server was at home yet the IP address is listed at an office in New York. She claimed she followed the law, but she destroyed documents she was told to turn over. And she claimed she never transmitted classified information, but if this is her only email account then this most likely is total Bullshit as well.
What? they told her to turn over her private emails? Really? Why? For what reason does congress critters want her private emails?

So hillary didnt do her job for months?
 
We just have to take her word that she never transmitted classified information on her server. No discussions with the president (classified), no talking about her schedule (classified), nothing to do with private discussions with foreign dignitaries (classified).

Did she ever do her job, or was she just greasing everyone for donations? Nigeria paid her foundation half a billion. I wonder what they expected in return?
I'm sure she had plenty of conversations with the president and others in the state dept.... So did Colin Powell using his private SECURE server.

Which means she transmitted classified information, which means she's lying about never doing so on her account.

She claimed her server was at home yet the IP address is listed at an office in New York. She claimed she followed the law, but she destroyed documents she was told to turn over. And she claimed she never transmitted classified information, but if this is her only email account then this most likely is total Bullshit as well.
What? they told her to turn over her private emails? Really? Why? For what reason does congress critters want her private emails?

Because she comingled her personal emails with her State Department emails none of her correspondence is private. It's her fault she used poor judgment.
 

Wait a minute..according to you liberals it wasnt a law when billary did it.
You need to brush up on your calender reading skills.
you need to brush up on the laws too ... its always been that government servers must be handed over ... he didn't do that... but that's ok ... we understand ...he's a repub-lie-can ... they don't have to follow the law

Not what hillary is claiming.
We just have to take her word that she never transmitted classified information on her server. No discussions with the president (classified), no talking about her schedule (classified), nothing to do with private discussions with foreign dignitaries (classified).

Did she ever do her job, or was she just greasing everyone for donations? Nigeria paid her foundation half a billion. I wonder what they expected in return?
I'm sure she had plenty of conversations with the president and others in the state dept.... So did Colin Powell using his private SECURE server.

Which means she transmitted classified information, which means she's lying about never doing so on her account.

She claimed her server was at home yet the IP address is listed at an office in New York. She claimed she followed the law, but she destroyed documents she was told to turn over. And she claimed she never transmitted classified information, but if this is her only email account then this most likely is total Bullshit as well.
What? they told her to turn over her private emails? Really? Why? For what reason does congress critters want her private emails?

Because she comingled her personal emails with her State Department emails none of her correspondence is private. It's her fault she used poor judgment.
It's LEGAL to do such.....

What part of that do you NOT UNDERSTAND?

ANDREA MITCHELL, NBC NEWS: Isn't it time for Hillary Clinton to speak out? If you were advising her, should she address these issues?

JAMES CARVILLE: I wouldn't -- I don't know exactly -- it was legal. It wasn't against regulations. Colin Powell and Jeb Bush did the same thing, but oh, my God. Do you remember Whitewater? Do you remember Foulgate? Do you remember Travelgate? Do you remember Pardongate? Do you remember Benghazi?

All of this is just the same cockamamie stuff that we go through. The Times got something from right-wing talking points. They print the story. They've got to walk the story back. And everybody -- the chin scratchers go 'Oh, my God. The story's not right, but it says something larger about the Clintons.' This is never going to end. We've lived with this for 20 years. We'll live with it for the rest of the campaign. It's all about nothing. That's my view of the whole thing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top