Hillary The "Hidden" Communist

DarkFury

Platinum Member
Feb 20, 2015
27,260
8,250
940
Sun, Sand And Palm Trees
Unlike Bernie Sanders who is at least HONEST about being a socialist democrat Hillary roots and love of the communist agenda is NOT being addressed by the media. As a matter of fact some of her records are quite well guarded such as school finals.

Now while one can go THERE and view them they are NOT up for public release to the media.

"Wellesley's president, Nannerl Overholser Keohane, approved a broad rule with a specific application: The senior thesis of every Wellesley alumna is available in the college archives for anyone to read -- except for those written by either a "president or first lady of the United States."

That "rule" was put in AFTER the press started asking questions about he finals.
Does it connect her to a hard line communist past? I think it does and rather tightly.

"David Brock, in his 1996 biography, "The Seduction of Hillary Rodham," called her "Alinsky's daughter."

This was not the only writer to see this another died in the September 11 attacks.

"Barbara Olson, the conservative lawyer and commentator, used an Alinsky quote to open every chapter of her 1999 book, "Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Olson, who died in the Sept. 11 terror attacks, had charged in her book that the thesis was locked away because Clinton "does not want the American people to know the extent to which she internalized and assimilated the beliefs and methods of Saul Alinsky."

And of course being the young Hillary her favorite tactic was then as now to attack. Males in general and male writers as a whole.

"She began with a feminist jab at the clichés of male authors: "Although I have no ‘loving wife’ to thank for keeping the children away while I wrote, I do have many friends and teachers who have contributed to the process of thesis-writing.” She thanks particularly “Mr. Alinsky for providing a topic, sharing his time and offering me a job.”

But young Hillary came by her attack style quite honestly. Alinsky taught it to her from his tactics.

'But Alinsky was no mere showman. He was a sometimes brutal seeker of power for others, schooling radicals with maxims such as "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it and polarize it."

Can a person find a reason WHY democrats and Hillary treat the middle class SO poorly? I think so.

"She noted, however, that he was trying to broaden his reach: In 1969, Alinsky was developing an institute in Chicago at his Industrial Areas Foundation, aimed at training organizers to galvanize a surprising target: the middle class. That was the job he offered to Hillary Rodham."

Why look at that! They targeted Chicago organizers! Who would have guessed?
You know I can name one of those very folks.

What you have folks today in the democrat party is a Marxist in the oval office with a socialist democrat and a communist looking to replace him IF you vote democrat. All three of those groups FAR from our founding and ALL three of those groups with a long standing goal of destroying liberty and freedom.

Reading Hillary Rodham's hidden thesis
 
People like OP have been rendered politically illiterate by the pundits. No hope for them to ever recover sanity at this point. They will go to their graves thinking everyone to the left of Rush Limbaugh is a commie.
 
Hillary campaigned for Goldwater in '64. Some "communist." :lmao:

Her views have clearly changed since Goldwater's days, but that said, she is certainly no Communist. She'd be another Wall Street shill like her husband was. The rich will continue getting richer and every now and then she'd throw a bone to the droolers in the lower and middle classes who think she actually gives a shit about them.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: mdk
Hillary campaigned for Goldwater in '64. Some "communist." :lmao:

Her views have clearly changed since Goldwater's days, but that said, she is certainly no Communist. She'd be another Wall Street shill like her husband was. The rich will continue getting richer and every now and then she'd throw a bone to the droolers in the lower and middle classes who think she actually gives a shit about them.

Depends on which application of communist you use. In the theory, no. In the way communism was practiced in many countries, yes.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Hillary campaigned for Goldwater in '64. Some "communist." :lmao:

Her views have clearly changed since Goldwater's days, but that said, she is certainly no Communist. She'd be another Wall Street shill like her husband was. The rich will continue getting richer and every now and then she'd throw a bone to the droolers in the lower and middle classes who think she actually gives a shit about them.
Her goals are not as clearly defined as Sanders but that is the difference between a communist and a socialist. A communist will NOT define where a socialist would.
 
Mc Carthy lives and breathes
The spirit of McCarthy lives in the shriveled black heart of every hard-core conservative who wants to bludgeon the world into something so simple they can understand it.
 
Her goals are not as clearly defined as Sanders but that is the difference between a communist and a socialist. A communist will NOT define where a socialist would.

She is socialist leaning in her policies, but there is nothing from her I have seen that would suggest she is a Communist. The accusation is as absurd as labeling Trump a racist for wanting to stem illegal immigration.
 
Her goals are not as clearly defined as Sanders but that is the difference between a communist and a socialist. A communist will NOT define where a socialist would.

She is socialist leaning in her policies, but there is nothing from her I have seen that would suggest she is a Communist. The accusation is as absurd as labeling Trump a racist for wanting to stem illegal immigration.
There is more then one style of communist. There is the Lenin style the Marx style and her style the Castro style.
 
Her goals are not as clearly defined as Sanders but that is the difference between a communist and a socialist. A communist will NOT define where a socialist would.

She is socialist leaning in her policies, but there is nothing from her I have seen that would suggest she is a Communist. The accusation is as absurd as labeling Trump a racist for wanting to stem illegal immigration.
There is more then one style of communist. There is the Lenin style the Marx style and her style the Castro style.

And she is none of the three.
 
Her goals are not as clearly defined as Sanders but that is the difference between a communist and a socialist. A communist will NOT define where a socialist would.

She is socialist leaning in her policies, but there is nothing from her I have seen that would suggest she is a Communist. The accusation is as absurd as labeling Trump a racist for wanting to stem illegal immigration.
There is more then one style of communist. There is the Lenin style the Marx style and her style the Castro style.

And she is none of the three.
Well we disagree. I see her as the third or another example would be a Chavez style communist.
 

Forum List

Back
Top